Evoq Content vs. Hugo - Meeting Notes Software

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Evoq Content
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Evoq Content is a content management system within the Evoq business suite. Evoq Content is extensible with many modules that add caching, advanced content approval workflow, granular permissions, document management, mobile accessibility of content, web farm support, and an ecommerce engine.N/A
Hugo - Meeting Notes Software
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Hugo was a connected meeting note-taking, management, and sharing app that Calendly acquired. The product is no longer available for sale.
$0
Pricing
Evoq ContentHugo - Meeting Notes Software
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic
$0 forever
Pro
$8
per month per user
Business
Get a demo
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Evoq ContentHugo - Meeting Notes Software
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsSave 25% when paid annually. Try all features with unlimited users for 21 days. Free forever up to 10 users.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Evoq ContentHugo - Meeting Notes Software
Considered Both Products
Evoq Content
Chose Evoq Content
Drupal is a highly expensive tool and is not offering anything extraordinary at a high price. If I keep its pricing in account then there should be some extraordinary features but unfortunately, there isn’t anything special about it; rather it was slow in its working. All these …
Chose Evoq Content
Evoq is a deeper and more flexible product than other CMS solutions we’ve used. When trying to match a client to the CMS they need, Evoq was always in the conversation.
Chose Evoq Content
In terms of value for money, Evoq Content is at the top.
Chose Evoq Content
DNN is an open source and is a primary choice for easy to use and use to build website for content management needs. DNN offers rich functionality utilizing core modules. Also, DNN offers an easy integration with third-party custom modules.
Chose Evoq Content
I have also used the Ektron CMS software platform before switching to DNN. It is a good product but it is much more costly than DNN and the product has a steeper learning curve and no where near the resources available like the community support and most importantly the …
Chose Evoq Content
DNN and WordPress share many similarities and can be used for the most part interchangeably when the goal is to create a simple hosted website. However, in other cases the requirements dictate a very clear choice. If your organization is invested in the Microsoft ecosystem in …
Chose Evoq Content
DNN is more cost effective, and has powerful backing of .NET platform.
Very much modular and skinning is relatively easy to do.
Chose Evoq Content
I have not used any other official .Net based CMS solutions other than DNN. I have used WordPress, which is a very good blogging application. But while they are making strides to be more of a CMS, I believe DNN is a better overall solution because of the ability to build custom …
Chose Evoq Content
A few products stack up against DNN like Wordpress, Drupal, SharePoint. Drupal, Wordpress, Joomla all are php based systems, while DNN, SharePoint were all .NET systems which is what I preferred. Comparing SharePoint to DNN, first would be the cost of SharePoint server along …
Hugo - Meeting Notes Software
Chose Hugo - Meeting Notes Software
OneNote is just classic - people who have been using it will never consider switching to a newcomer like Hugo. One limitation that OneNote has though which Hugo might be able to play to its advantage is - high barriers to the entrance for new users. It's not exactly intuitive …
Chose Hugo - Meeting Notes Software
Only Hugo - Meeting Notes Software could address my problems better than any other software I tried, and none of them came close. Worth a try. Despite its simplicity, it packs a tremendous punch thanks to its extensive feature set.
Chose Hugo - Meeting Notes Software
Hugo is a great alternative for small organizations or teams. It is not too pricey but offers good functionalities and features. It also has a simple yet very effective and easy to navigate interface. I would definitely recommend Hugo Meeting Notes Software especially for teams …
Chose Hugo - Meeting Notes Software
Hugo is more user friendly than Teams, and much more focused on the notes part of the meeting and keeping organized (historically as well)
Chose Hugo - Meeting Notes Software
Earlier I used to manage the meeting action on a diary but it was difficult to manage and find more complexity day by day, using Hugo's meeting notes things become easier, I can search for historical details at my fingertips and set the action items on such task. These tools …
Chose Hugo - Meeting Notes Software
The quality of support is better with Hugo. Ease of use is also good with Hugo than when compared to Coda. Hugo met our requirements, so decided to choose it over Coda. It is easier to set up Hugo when compared to Coda and it saves a lot of time.
Features
Evoq ContentHugo - Meeting Notes Software
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Evoq Content
9.7
Ratings
18% above category average
Hugo - Meeting Notes Software
-
Ratings
Role-based user permissions9.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Evoq Content
9.0
Ratings
17% above category average
Hugo - Meeting Notes Software
-
Ratings
API9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Evoq Content
8.8
Ratings
13% above category average
Hugo - Meeting Notes Software
-
Ratings
WYSIWYG editor8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Admin section9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Page templates8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Library of website themes9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Publishing workflow8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Form generator8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Evoq Content
8.5
Ratings
14% above category average
Hugo - Meeting Notes Software
-
Ratings
Content taxonomy8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
SEO support8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Bulk management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Community / comment management8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Evoq ContentHugo - Meeting Notes Software
Small Businesses
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Zoom Workplace
Zoom Workplace
Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Zoom Workplace
Zoom Workplace
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Zoom Workplace
Zoom Workplace
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Evoq ContentHugo - Meeting Notes Software
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Evoq ContentHugo - Meeting Notes Software
Likelihood to Recommend
It is good for all sizes of firms from small to large. Everyone can use this tool to manage content and it has all the basic features needed. It is quite a flexible tool [which] is a positive point of this tool, and the mobile access is also amazing. What I don’t like about it is its tech support that should be made vigilant and there are not enough updates.
Read full review
Using Hugo - Meeting Notes Software during a conference or any other meeting is highly recommended because of its outstanding note-taking abilities. Organizing a conference has never been easier thanks to this application. When compared to other note-taking software options, this one is less priced and requires no ongoing maintenance after installation. It aids in data security by having an autosave button and backup storage.
Read full review
Pros
  • Evoq is very extensible. As long as you can program in ASP.NET, you can customize it for any solution you may need.
  • It has great user controls and granular permissions for users allowing you to control access not whole sections of the site, individual pages, or even parts of a page.
  • Some of the modules you can purchase allow you to derive far more value than what you pay.
Read full review
  • Shares agenda for meetings and allows people to contribute to meeting
  • Allows you to schedule future meetings while in the meeting
Read full review
Cons
  • Skin customization has room to be improved.
  • Mobile friendly platform, e.g.: make use of the Bootstrap as default skin
  • DNN is more into software developer. It will nice to have some tools for web designers.
  • Lacking of complete facilities for disabled people (see WCAG). In this case Sitecore is much more powerful.
Read full review
  • Text formatting are limited.
  • Rename of notes could be more easier than existing.
  • Split multiple notes in single meeting and assign action to each of one.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Even though DNN is a good CMS, I have worked with other CMSs which are far more robust at this point, and would not be overly inclined to select DNN unless cost of the product is the most important factor along with staying on .NET. DNN is a whole package so unless the client has a requirement of including authentication, authorization for users, eCommerce, sticking to something simple is a better option.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Evoq proved to be a solid backbone for our property-management portal, handling ≈300 active rental listings without performance hiccups. The page-builder made it straightforward to craft listing templates that surface photo galleries, floor-plan PDFs, and embedded map pins, while role-based workflows let leasing agents edit unit details (price, availability, pet policy) without touching global site settings—a big win for operational control.

For the management side, the platform’s extensibility let us plug in a third-party rent-payment widget and an automated maintenance-ticket form with minimal custom code. Evoq’s built-in analytics have already highlighted which neighborhoods and bedroom counts drive the most traffic, guiding our marketing spend.

Two caveats:


Search & filter logic – Out-of-the-box search was too shallow for renters who expect Zillow-style filtering. We had to commission a custom module for filter chips (price range, amenities, walk score), which added time and cost.
Mobile image optimization – High-resolution gallery images affected load times on 4G; a CDN or Evoq’s Digital Asset Optimizer add-on is advisable.



Overall, Evoq delivers reliable content governance and enough flexibility to support both consumer-facing listings and back-office property-management workflows, provided you budget for advanced search customization and image delivery tuning.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I don't see how it could get any better unless they moved their staff into our offices. You have available to you any type of Support you need or want, both paid and free from thousands of developers and consultants all over the world. You might even find some on Mars if you look hard enough.Also, with all of the available resources available from your Browser you can literally find the answer to any question you have in a matter of minutes.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Evoq proved to be a solid backbone for our property-management portal, handling ≈300 active rental listings without performance hiccups. The page-builder made it straightforward to craft listing templates that surface photo galleries, floor-plan PDFs, and embedded map pins, while role-based workflows let leasing agents edit unit details (price, availability, pet policy) without touching global site settings—a big win for operational control.

For the management side, the platform’s extensibility let us plug in a third-party rent-payment widget and an automated maintenance-ticket form with minimal custom code. Evoq’s built-in analytics have already highlighted which neighborhoods and bedroom counts drive the most traffic, guiding our marketing spend.

Two caveats:


Search & filter logic – Out-of-the-box search was too shallow for renters who expect Zillow-style filtering. We had to commission a custom module for filter chips (price range, amenities, walk score), which added time and cost.
Mobile image optimization – High-resolution gallery images affected load times on 4G; a CDN or Evoq’s Digital Asset Optimizer add-on is advisable.



Overall, Evoq delivers reliable content governance and enough flexibility to support both consumer-facing listings and back-office property-management workflows, provided you budget for advanced search customization and image delivery tuning.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
DNN and WordPress share many similarities and can be used for the most part interchangeably when the goal is to create a simple hosted website. However, in other cases the requirements dictate a very clear choice. If your organization is invested in the Microsoft ecosystem in terms of software and employee expertise then DNN is a superior choice. However if you will be relying on contractors for installation, development, and maintenance then WordPress' popularity means you will have more options.
Read full review
OneNote is just classic - people who have been using it will never consider switching to a newcomer like Hugo. One limitation that OneNote has though which Hugo might be able to play to its advantage is - high barriers to the entrance for new users. It's not exactly intuitive to navigate at first if you have never used it before, hence you should be targeting those users instead of chasing users loyal to OneNote.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Evoq proved to be a solid backbone for our property-management portal, handling ≈300 active rental listings without performance hiccups. The page-builder made it straightforward to craft listing templates that surface photo galleries, floor-plan PDFs, and embedded map pins, while role-based workflows let leasing agents edit unit details (price, availability, pet policy) without touching global site settings—a big win for operational control.
  • For the management side, the platform’s extensibility let us plug in a third-party rent-payment widget and an automated maintenance-ticket form with minimal custom code. Evoq’s built-in analytics have already highlighted which neighborhoods and bedroom counts drive the most traffic, guiding our marketing spend.
  • Two caveats:
  • Search & filter logic – Out-of-the-box search was too shallow for renters who expect Zillow-style filtering. We had to commission a custom module for filter chips (price range, amenities, walk score), which added time and cost.
  • Mobile image optimization – High-resolution gallery images affected load times on 4G; a CDN or Evoq’s Digital Asset Optimizer add-on is advisable.
  • Overall, Evoq delivers reliable content governance and enough flexibility to support both consumer-facing listings and back-office property-management workflows, provided you budget for advanced search customization and image delivery tuning.
  • DNN allowed to quickly build modern websites with rich contents and flexible functionalty
  • DNN allowed to easily implement complex security access
Read full review
  • Closing acton logs to set clearer paths to business goals
  • Serves as good reference tool for important conversations that impact business objectives
  • Fosters easy collaboration within the organization
Read full review
ScreenShots