| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Expensify | Score7.6 out of 10 | N/A | Expensify automates the entire spend management process. Scan receipts, track mileage, submit and approve expenses, manage corporate cards, reimburse employees, pay bills, send invoices, and book travel. Built for individuals and companies of all sizes, anywhere in the world. | $5 per month per user |
 Rippling | Score8.9 out of 10 | N/A | Rippling’s platform for HR, IT, payroll, and spend management automates the entire employee lifecycle, ensures compliance, supports device management, and provides real-time financial visibility from a central dashboard. | $8 per month per user |
| Expensify | Rippling | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | For additional pricing details visit the Rippling pricing page. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Expensify | Rippling | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Expensify This is the only expensing software I’ve used Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info | Chose Rippling Rippling has a lot more features as opposed to the other programs I have used, and they seem to be better with their customer service. The interface is also a lot easier to use and manage when dealing with the team of people Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Rippling Rippling is all inclusive instead of having to jump from one application to another when tracking personal information where the others are not. We selected Rippling because of this ease of use for the employees plus less integration with other systems for pulling and tracking … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Rippling Rippling is far more intuitive and detailed, with more features which integrate with each other. UKG Pro was much more barebones with less automation, and so it was harder to find the answers to my questions. Rippling has been extremely smooth, and I don't have to spend much … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Rippling Incentivized Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Rippling Rippling is more than a basic Payroll processing software Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Rippling We have used paylocity and this has been far better and cleaner Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Rippling Lots of similar options but everything in Rippling just looks and feels better. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Rippling Incentivized Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Rippling Head to head I think they are equal from a user standpoint. I am not sure how this product stands up from an HR point of view. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Rippling I have not used any other product as I used to work in academia and the paperwork as dealt with by the H.R. /planning department. After using Rippling I can tell the impact that it has on H.R. effort and the easiness to access one own's information easily. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Rippling Rippling is much more user-friendly and expansive/configurable Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Expensify | Rippling | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Payment Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Human Resource Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Payroll Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Leave and Attendance Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Employee Self Service |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Asset Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HR Reporting |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Onboarding |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Performance and Goals |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Performance Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Succession Planning |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Recruiting / ATS |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Expensify | Rippling | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.1 | 9.1 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | 9.1 |
| Usability | 7.0 | 9.2 |
| Availability | - | 9.1 |
| Performance | - | 7.3 |
| Support Rating | 8.5 | 9.3 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 8.4 |
| Configurability | - | 1.0 |
| Ease of integration | - | 9.1 |
| Product Scalability | - | 9.1 |
