EZO vs. Sage Fixed Assets

I believe that Sage is not suited well for our company because we are too large. To add new users we have to go into all 200+ companies and add their access individually. This is time-consuming and not a good way to manage access.

Incentivized

• Managing Fixed Assets
• Calculating Depreciation
• Depreciation Schedule

Incentivized

• Adding new users with multiple company access
• Copying users

Incentivized

Of all the software we use, Sage is one of the easiest to use. The simple interface makes the whole fixed asset process easy to understand and when new users are onboarded, they have no trouble learning the product. The product also performs well speed and stability wise, making for a great user experience overall

Incentivized

Rather lackluster. Our account manager generally works with Sage's support team and oftentimes finds herself frustrated with a lack of understanding from the support team. Additionally, when IT is attempting to update the system (which from my understanding is a bear of epic complex proportions) they often times find themselves frustrated and at a loss for what needs done.

Incentivized

Sage was overall a much simpler product to understand. Our users were able to wrap their heads around how it worked and the learning curve was very short. Meanwhile the other products we looked at seemed so complicated for what were needing. I am glad that we chose Sage in the end.

Incentivized

• It is incredibly difficult to use and our business users generally do not look favorably on it.
• It is relatively low cost, which is a nice feature and lends to quick ROI.

Incentivized