Chose Ezoic
I've used a host of other ad networks in the past. None come even close to what Ezoic has.
Ezoic vs. Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Ezoic vs. Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Ezoic | Small Businesses (1-50 employees) | Ezoic gives independent publishers a fully-automated, scientific solution for improving income from advertising as well as improving user experience. Ezoic technology is a fully automated multivariate testing platform for webmasters who might not have the time or the ability to construct multivariate tests for their site. It is designed for content publishers to improve income from advertising by automatically testing ad placement and usability metrics (Ezoic is not for ecommerce or marketing… | $0.20 No Ad, all features | |
 Google Content Experiments (discontinued) | N/A | Google Content Experiments was a tool that can be used to create A/B test from within Google Analytics. It has been discontinued since 2019, and Google now recommends using its Google Optimize service for A/B testing. | N/A |
| Ezoic | Google Content Experiments (discontinued) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Ezoic | Google Content Experiments (discontinued) | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Ezoic |  Google Content Experiments (discontinued)  Mark Castaldo Marketing Web Developer Chose Google Content Experiments (discontinued) Google Website Optimizer was a better product but has been discontinued. We have also used Test and Target , which has more features but we have been doing fine with Google Content Experiments. Most testing situations can be handled with Google Content Experiments.  Antonio Segovia IT Applications Manager Chose Google Content Experiments (discontinued) Google Content Experiment cannot compete with Adobe Test and Target, Quadratics or even Optimizley. It is harder to use with no editing interface, so pages must be actually developed. It doesn't allow for any advanced segmenting or multivarient testing. But it is free, so …  Sam Wiltshire Web Marketing Specialist Chose Google Content Experiments (discontinued) Google CE is free, Optimizely isn't plus only until recently I found out that Optimizely can work with multiple goals, however, this was found by meeting their employees at a trade show and not via their website.  Lee Duong Conversion Manager Chose Google Content Experiments (discontinued) We'd use content experiments as a complimentary testing tool alongside more comprehensive testing packages out there. As a free testing tool it does the job for basic A/B testing.  John Mills Customer & Consumer Insight Manager Chose Google Content Experiments (discontinued) If you are looking for a more advanced great value for money solution I would recommend investigating Visual Website Optimizer. For a more powerful enterprise level solution with the option to have a fully managed service I would recommend Maxymiser.  Jenny DeGraff Design Optimization Manager Chose Google Content Experiments (discontinued) Google Content Experiments provides significantly more insight, historical data and analysis than Unbounce. However, if you do need a solution that offers a WYSIWYG editor, landing page hosting, and limited reporting and testing, Unbounce is a good all-in-one solution and that …  David Jackiewicz Marketing Manager Chose Google Content Experiments (discontinued) Google CE does a great job streamlining tools and features. Optimizely does not offer nearly the same amount of tools or resources that G CE does. I would use CE in the future but stay away from Optimizely. Google also has a lot more resources for accruing knowledge on it … |
| Ezoic | Google Content Experiments (discontinued) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Testing and Experimentation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Results and Analysis |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Audience Segmentation & Targeting |
|
| Ezoic | Google Content Experiments (discontinued) | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses |  Convert Experiences Score 9.9 out of 10 | Convert Experiences Score 9.9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies |  Dynamic Yield Score 8.3 out of 10 | Dynamic Yield Score 8.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Dynamic Yield Score 8.3 out of 10 | Dynamic Yield Score 8.3 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Ezoic | Google Content Experiments (discontinued) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 (0 ratings) | 9.0 (0 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 7.5 (0 ratings) |
| Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 8.0 (0 ratings) |
| Ezoic | Google Content Experiments (discontinued) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
Sam Wiltshire Web Marketing Specialist |
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
Jenny DeGraff Design Optimization Manager |
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
Mark Castaldo Marketing Web Developer |
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | Ezoic Screenshots  |