F5 BIG-IP vs. Ipanema SD-WAN (discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
F5 BIG-IP
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
F5 BIG-IP software from Seattle-based F5 Networks is a load balancing and application protection solution suite available on cloud or via virtual editions, on a subscription or perpetual licensing basis.N/A
Ipanema SD-WAN (discontinued)
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
French company Ipanema was acquired in April 2015 by InfoVista, to expand that company's offerings into WAN optimization and became part of Extreme Networks portfolio, after the acquistion in late 2021. But the product line is discontinued, and no longer supported or sold.N/A
Pricing
F5 BIG-IPIpanema SD-WAN (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
F5 BIG-IPIpanema SD-WAN (discontinued)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
F5 BIG-IPIpanema SD-WAN (discontinued)
Considered Both Products
F5 BIG-IP
Chose F5 BIG-IP
The logic is intelligently used in the F5 dns to build a high availability architecture for services and infinite possibilities for global balancing.
Chose F5 BIG-IP
Si bien ambos productos son buenos, la flexibilidad de F5 nos convenció de adoptarlo.

While both products are good, the flexibility of F5 convinced us to adopt it.
Chose F5 BIG-IP
Competencia directa.

Direct Competition
Chose F5 BIG-IP
Porque nos es agnóstico a la tecnología implementada, de esta manera podemos evaluar en un futuro adquirir nuevas tecnologías y no depender de un solo vendor para implementar distintas necesidades que puedan surgir a futuro. Por lo tanto, se puede decir que los productos de F5 …
Chose F5 BIG-IP
versatility in terms of customizing the application specific parameters, as well as security features
Chose F5 BIG-IP
It stacks up great. I mean it does in most cases a better job. I mean there's no competition in that regard.
Chose F5 BIG-IP
We are recently not evaluating, but we have started the deployment for WAF and we're using GTM, LTM, you name it. F5, we are using all of them.
Chose F5 BIG-IP
We've had it for so long, we just not really ever looked elsewhere, honestly. Yeah, it's been a great tool.
Chose F5 BIG-IP
Hardware via the cloud solution from F5. I'm drawing a blank on the name right now. Distributed cloud, I think is what they call it.
Chose F5 BIG-IP
The ACE with Child Ace as well as a low balancer, but big IP tends to work better.
Chose F5 BIG-IP
There's other, Kemp is one for that would be where we see the gap, where they do better in the mid-market space and then a 10 in the larger accounts. Those are probably the two that come to mind the most.
Chose F5 BIG-IP
That's the one thing that really stood out. It was a lot easier to use from an administrator standpoint, so I think that's the one thing that really made our team decide to go with this product versus another competitor. Just ease of use.
Chose F5 BIG-IP
None, Actually since a lot of our customers are using BIG-IP, so we provide control for BIG-IP.
Chose F5 BIG-IP
Works really well. Like I was saying with the ease of use and I mean it's great hardware really fast, we've had zero issues with that, so it's been good
Chose F5 BIG-IP
Very well. They're the leader in their space and we always like to pick best of breed, which we consider F5 BIG-IP.
Chose F5 BIG-IP
We always used f5 products and we like it
Chose F5 BIG-IP
NGINX, Amazon Elastic Load Balancing and Caddy 2
Chose F5 BIG-IP
As I said previously, the F5 BIG-IP products are far and away the easiest, most robust and powerful application delivery platform I've ever worked on. The user experience was really the most noteworthy difference when using other products. The Kemp Load master platform was …
Chose F5 BIG-IP
CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection, CyberArk Privileged Access Management, Zscaler Internet Access and Zscaler Private Access
Chose F5 BIG-IP
F5 BIG-IP is More stable, and has more features by far.
Chose F5 BIG-IP
DDos protection is better from distributed model
Ipanema SD-WAN (discontinued)
Chose Ipanema SD-WAN (discontinued)
Customer went through multiple vendors to address their issue related to application performance and WAN performance improvement. We went into discussion with Riverbed and Ipanema. Ipanema WAN Optimization solution fulfilled their requirements as some of the features like …
Best Alternatives
F5 BIG-IPIpanema SD-WAN (discontinued)
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
F5 BIG-IPIpanema SD-WAN (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
9.2
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.2
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
F5 BIG-IPIpanema SD-WAN (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
Definitely in larger environments, more mature organizations that obviously have the budget to spend and want best in class. Where it struggles is those organizations that don't have the funding and money to spend on it and need more basic functionality. So I'd say that's smaller customers we've worked with and kind of mid-market. They tend to get scared when they get the quotes. Also we've had some struggles with account team consistency. So for the sales team, just a lot of turnover and a lot of missteps on customer calls.
Read full review
Ipanema WAN Optimization solution is best suited for organizations where poor application performance and application visibility are the key challenges. It is effective where most of the customer sites are in areas where bandwidth upgrade is a challenge. Centralised management of devices through Web Server makes it easy to manage & control them.
Read full review
Pros
  • The great thing is the IP address management that's happening. When you set up the network it's very easy and you don't have to keep on configuring everything together. Again, it's very streamlined and it's one of the biggest players there in the market for this work.
Read full review
  • Dynamic WAN selection.
  • Application monitoring.
  • WAN optimization.
  • Application performance management.
  • Performance improvement.
Read full review
Cons
  • Well, not necessarily the features. I find that we have to change our processes in order to kind of match what F5 BIG-IP does. And it's not a bad thing, it's just that a lot of my engineers want to do it their way, not they F5 BIG-IP way.
Read full review
  • SaaS Applications.
  • Knowledge base on support portal.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We have been using F5 for the last 25 years and there is no way we will leave F5 for any other load balancers.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
It's not difficult to understand the parts of application configurations and features. Setting up new virtual servers with multiple profiles, certificates, and nodes is easy for new users through the web interface, which also translates to programability in scripts, DevOps, or other configuration management use-cases. Users from different backgrounds such as networking and infrastructure can use F5 BIG-IP, while users who are familiar with API calls can easily configure objects without needing to understand the platform at all.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
On the occasions when we've had to engage f5 support, they have been great. They have always resolved our issues quickly and been easy to work with and professional. The reason I give them a 10 out of 10, however, is because when we've had issues that have crossed over between the f5 BIG-IP, our Cisco switches, and our Microsoft IIS server the f5 support representatives have been extremely knowledgeable about every product and device involved and have been able to troubleshoot end-to-end without having to engage other vendors.
Read full review
Some of the problem areas where I feel it wasn't easy enough like troubleshooting, digging deep with packet inspection, security. But Dynamic WAN Selection based on the AQS parameters give this solution an advantage on the other products. Newly added features like cloud application performance monitoring is simplified now.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Practical cases and hands on , many hours of training with tipical cases
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
implementation is fine
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We are recently not evaluating, but we have started the deployment for WAF and we're using GTM, LTM, you name it. F5, we are using all of them.
Read full review
Customer went through multiple vendors to address their issue related to application performance and WAN performance improvement. We went into discussion with Riverbed and Ipanema. Ipanema WAN Optimization solution fulfilled their requirements as some of the features like teleengine, virtual ipbox extra are an advantage over the Riverbed solution.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • I would say from a security perspective, because I manage security, availability is sort of the key area for us and making sure that is properly handled through BIG-IP, that is the biggest business success, I would say from the product perspective.
Read full review
  • This can improve end user experience, which leads to reduced operational cost.
  • Return on Investment in 24 months.
  • Centralised management of devices can ease in management of devices.
Read full review
ScreenShots