F5 BIG-IQ Centralized Management vs. Homebrew

F5 BIG-IQ Centralized Management works perfectly in Software upgrades and simple daily changes. We are successfully using it to create and or delete objects. It doesn`t works well when we need reports. I usually have to create custom scripts to get a list of objects, for example. Performance is also something that could be improved in Big-IQ

Incentivized

• Common system level changes like cipher suite customization, ssh protocol settings etc can be pushed to all F5 gear through one click of a button
• Enterprise standard templates for profiles/protocols etc., can be efficiently managed across F5 gear through a single interface

Incentivized

• There a lack of the going forward to next
• The second site product does not do what we need and we are forced to write our own scripts
• Many of the alerting that was in enterprise management is no longer in F5 BIG-IQ Centralized Management

Incentivized

It may be due to how we deployed it or how we use it, but it adds time to doing small changes. I do like the deployment detail and change tracking though.

Incentivized

Incentivized

• It allow us to back up this has saved us part
• We are able to do the full inventory of system the help in our fqc

Incentivized