| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 FigJam | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | FigJam is an online interactive whiteboard from Figma headquartered in San Francisco, presently in beta (2021) but available to the public in a free trial. The vendor states that in 2022, FigJam will have plans for $0, $8, and $15 per editor, per month. | $5 per month per editor |
 Miro | Score9.2 out of 10 | N/A | Miro empowers cross-functional teams to flow from early discovery through final delivery on a shared, AI-first canvas. With the canvas as the prompt, Miro’s AI capabilities keep teams in the flow of work, and scale shifts in ways of working. | $10 per month per user |
| FigJam | Miro | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Monthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| FigJam | Miro | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose FigJam I feel like Figjam is great at at what it does. It provides a great overall place to be able to use a virtual whiteboard and help teams collaborate. Especially remote teams. It actually does it better than others. There are some tools such as InVision Freehand that at the … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info | Chose Miro Incentivized Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro We have a corporate contract with Miro but we also have Figma and FigJam and we use both for different roles Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro I had to select Miro because of its superior integration, which works effortlessly, and its better functionality. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Miro I actually love them both. But, Miro has an advantage in the company I work with. There we have both business people that are not at all accustomed wit Figma, but are well versed with Miro. With Miro, its easier to conduct workshops outside of the tech and design team. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro It's easier to navigate, simpler to use and I enjoy the brand and experience of using the product. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| FigJam | Miro | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 | 9.2 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.5 |
| Usability | 8.6 | 9.1 |
| Availability | - | 9.8 |
| Performance | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 7.5 |
| Online Training | - | 10.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.1 |
| Configurability | - | 7.9 |
| Ease of integration | - | 8.2 |
| Product Scalability | - | 8.2 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 7.2 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 5.8 |
