| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Miro | Score9.2 out of 10 | N/A | Miro empowers cross-functional teams to flow from early discovery through final delivery on a shared, AI-first canvas. With the canvas as the prompt, Miro’s AI capabilities keep teams in the flow of work, and scale shifts in ways of working. | $10 per month per user |
| Miro | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| ||||||||||
| Offerings |
| ||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | ||||||||||
| Additional Details | Monthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan. | ||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | |||||||||||
| Miro | |
|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Miro Miro is the more collaborative option, offering the ability for many individuals to work on the same item real-time. Though it does create some duplicate entry, we've found this added cost is minimal compared to the opportunity cost of lost collaboration. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Miro We ran a business case analysis for these, and they didn't come close. Visual omnipresent collaboration is a must; list of different features is way longer in Miro; Kanban and its views is less clunky and requires less fiddling out of the box — Trello needed to be set up … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Miro I think they all have very good features and are similar to a certain extent, however, Miro includes all the interactive features and allows you to create without limitations on format or page sizes, or oversaturation of users within the same session, which is why I appreciate … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro Miro is a perfect match for organizations looking to enhance productivity and a single stop solution for collaboration. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro We assessed these tools to gain a better understanding because they are excellent and have certain unique features. But in the end, we chose Miro since it offers all the features that ClickUp, Stormboard, and Conceptboard do. Additionally, it has a special feature that lets you … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro We tested every product, but the biggest problem we encountered was that most of them required plugins in order to centralize all of our work. Other problems included the products' excessive price, which was higher than Miro's. Last but not least, Miro offered us an all-in-one … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro Google Jam Board but didn't like it cause no endless canvases.. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro Ease of use and customization! Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro I had to select Miro because of its superior integration, which works effortlessly, and its better functionality. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | |
| Would buy again | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Miro | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.2 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.5 |
| Usability | 9.1 |
| Availability | 9.8 |
| Performance | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | 7.5 |
| Online Training | 10.0 |
| Implementation Rating | 9.1 |
| Configurability | 7.9 |
| Ease of integration | 8.2 |
| Product Scalability | 8.2 |
| Vendor post-sale | 7.2 |
| Vendor pre-sale | 5.8 |
