FloQast vs. Workday Adaptive Planning

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
FloQast
Score 9.4 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
FloQast offers their financial close software to streamline accounting month end close, simply providing automation around reconciliation and eliminating human error, and visibility via a close status dashboard, as well as providing a complete audit trail.N/A
Workday Adaptive Planning
Score 7.8 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Workday Adaptive Planning streamlines planning workflows, using AI and real-time data integration to improve collaboration and provide predictive forecasts for better strategic analysis.N/A
Pricing
FloQastWorkday Adaptive Planning
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FloQastWorkday Adaptive Planning
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FloQastWorkday Adaptive Planning
Considered Both Products
FloQast
Chose FloQast
that was all manual, this keeps things in one central place and automatically syncs with our ERP
Chose FloQast
We started with BlackLine and after a year and limited adoption across the accounting team, changed to FloQast. We had numerous reasons, including difficulty in working with the BlackLine standard reconciliation, time needed to complete the set up for automatic reconciliation …
Chose FloQast
We use Netsuite for our main GL and reporting ERP. Blackline was much more expensive and we went with FloQast.
Chose FloQast
Having FloQast automatically pulls updates from excel files saved in our shared folders is key instead of having to upload new files as we've done in the past with other comparable products
Chose FloQast
At the time we picked FloQast, they were the most cost effective and easiest tool to use. Fast forward a little bit, and Numeric has come to market. I really lie Numeric to be honest and feel that their pricing is better and for that lower pricing, they include more …
Chose FloQast
The User Interface and implementation were the key drivers for choosing FloQast compared to BlackLine.
Chose FloQast
Since it connects to our accounting software it has made the closing process much better than any other tools.
Chose FloQast
The User Interface and implementation were the key drivers for choosing FQ compared to BL. Our team was up in a matter of days or so it felt! Even if you didn't get properly trained in FQ, you could easily figure it out on your own, which was nice, especially for a large team.
Chose FloQast
We found that FloQast fit well into our existing close process and made it much more efficient. Other rooms, such as Blackline, required a longer and more costly implementation. It also required the use of their reconciliation formats. We did not see the value in that …
Chose FloQast
I used Blackline many years ago but found it to be a waste of time. I didn't like being required to use the Blackline format for reconciliations. The one size fits all mentality never quite works out when it comes to accounting - every business does things a little differently. …
Chose FloQast
Netgain has a product called NetClose which we've considered but ultimately went with FloQast because of simplicity and ease of use. The other product was more technical and hands on.
Chose FloQast
FloQast has a strong brand, offers excellent customer service, has a strong core product, and continues to improve and provide additional value to its customers.
Chose FloQast
More dynamic, linked with tools we already use including g drive and excel
Chose FloQast
We evaluated BlackLine along with FloQast and ultimately decided to sign up with FloQast. Our team really liked the ability to leverage their existing Excel reconciliation templates that could link to the FloQast user interface. Comparatively, the pre-made reconciliation …
Chose FloQast
We evaluated Blackline when we were considering Floqast. Although Blackline is very robust and feature rich it was not right for us at the time of our review. We chose Floqast because:
1. It was simple to set up. We were up in running in a few weeks as compared to the 6 month …
Chose FloQast
We primarily use FloQast for close and variance analysis whereas we use Monday for project tracking including Audit PBC
Chose FloQast
I have not used any other products
Chose FloQast
We selected FloQast because of how flexible it was and how easily it incorporated our existing excel workpapers into the system. It was also able to accommodate our ERP, despite not having a native integration for it.
Chose FloQast
FloQast is more user-friendly and flexible. The product is updated more frequently.
Chose FloQast
I have experience using Asana and Jira in previous jobs and while they are both useful, neither are tailored to accounting. That is where I feel that FloQast truly shines - there are so many features that other project management softwares are lacking, and after using FloQast …
Chose FloQast
NetClose (from NetGain) is pretty similar and is also a great tool. For a single company that uses NetSuite, NetClose can be a great option, however FloQast has more features like ReMind and aurorecs that NetClose does not have. For a CAS firm, it is a no brainer though, …
Workday Adaptive Planning
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
Time saving, centralised reports, visibility into metrics and numbers.
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
Workday Adaptive Planning is similar to payroll and workforce management by implementing constant and new changes to finances, workplace changes and the people changing in rolls and employment. Both tools are very useful and practical in a company setting and mainly in …
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
Like I said in a previous question, the fact that there was downtime that was needed to update all the data that was entered in a day was not ideal. This caused for hours lost on the data update and didn't allow our leaders to see the affects immediately like Workday Adaptive …
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
Workday has been the only platform product I have used for FP&A.
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
Overall being familiar with the Workday Adaptive Planning tool's flexibility and ease of use our finance and ops team saw this as the easiest and most robust tool that they could admin and maintain without outside IT resources.
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
In my opinion, Spreadsheet Server is not even in the same game as Workday Adaptive Planning. While it is flexible in Excel, it still requires a lot of back and forth for analysis.
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
Workday Adaptive Planning is less expensive than Oracle, and the integration is continuous.
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
Very easy to do it yourself. WIth Hyperion/Anaplan, I had to rely on outside resources to do basic model changes.
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
I choose to use Adaptive instead of Netsuite any opportunity that I get.
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
Our previous platform was patchwork tools and unintegrated. We were clunky and poorly organized. The system was slow and difficult to use, and it was either overhaul it or start over. We evaluated our options holistically and went with Workday. It works better and faster, and …
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
Workday provides adaptive and intuitive planning that does not has disruptions when there is any change in system or migrations of servers, users or systems. Workday integrates with CRM, ERP and other database engines to source data and provides insights that can be exported to …
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
It doesn't have the same standard fulfillment modeling as the true workforce planning products, it equals the other core HCM systems and beats them on ease of use.
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
We didn't check for any other provider since we got a recommendation from a Provider and we went only for Workday
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
Workday Adaptive Planning is not as robust as SAP Ariba, but it is certainly better than BadgePass. The trouble with BadgePass is that it can be a but clunky in some modules that seem like clear bolt ons to the main product UI. Whereas, Ariba was clearly built to satisfy …
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
Workday became our choice because it is fully web-based and easily integrates with other systems. The learning curve for Workday was shorter than that of Dynamics. The reporting tools in Workday are more user-friendly than that of Dynamics. However Workday did not have Check …
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
From our initial findings, Workday Adaptive seemed like it was going to be easier to get up and running out of the box and fit the needs of our company more.
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
The main thing that sets [Workday] Adaptive [Planning] apart is the fact that it is a cloud based software, user friendly, and allows you to add to or change the model relatively easily. Hyperion is a good tool also but there is more flexibility with [Workday] Adaptive …
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
Workday is the only software system (outside of Excel) that has been used by Vera to do our planning and analysis. We have just opted to move to Workday Adaptive Planning for our accounting system, payroll, and supply chain with the hopes that it will make our planning that …
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
All of the systems have their own unique strengths and weaknesses. Workday Adaptive Planning as a system is further along in overall functionality and is a more user-friendly system compared to other EPM systems on the market.
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
We did some analysis of Anaplan, but it seemed they were built for much bigger companies. It did not seem like we could implement and maintain Anaplan without significant IT support, which was one of the main goals of the project. Anaplan did seem like it could have more …
Features
FloQastWorkday Adaptive Planning
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
8.5
Ratings
4% above category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
6.8
Ratings
16% below category average
Financial data consolidation8.50 Ratings5.70 Ratings
Journal entries and reports7.80 Ratings5.40 Ratings
Multi-currency management8.00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails9.20 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Customizable Workflows8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings5.30 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings5.10 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Workday Adaptive Planning
9.3
Ratings
20% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Workday Adaptive Planning
8.0
Ratings
2% below category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Workday Adaptive Planning
8.0
Ratings
3% below category average
Publish to PDF00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Workday Adaptive Planning
7.7
Ratings
1% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Workday Adaptive Planning
9.0
Ratings
3% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Workday Adaptive Planning
8.5
Ratings
9% above category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Mobile Application00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Workday Adaptive Planning
9.6
Ratings
15% above category average
Long-term financial planning00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Financial budgeting00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Scenario modeling00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Management reporting00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Workday Adaptive Planning
9.0
Ratings
11% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Management Reporting00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Workday Adaptive Planning
8.8
Ratings
9% above category average
Personalized dashboards00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
KPIs00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Workday Adaptive Planning
8.8
Ratings
5% above category average
Flat file integration00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Excel data integration00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Best Alternatives
FloQastWorkday Adaptive Planning
Small Businesses
Tipalti
Tipalti
Score 8.7 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Cube
Cube
Score 8.9 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FloQastWorkday Adaptive Planning
Likelihood to Recommend
9.2
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
7.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.8
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Online Training
7.4
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.3
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.1
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.1
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
FloQastWorkday Adaptive Planning
Likelihood to Recommend
It's really good in ensuring all of our accounting/finance people are on the same page and knowing what work is outstanding, at what step in the process reconcs or checklists or at, if we're tracking on time, who may need some additional support, etc. It really does a great job of letting us know when accounts are out of balance and needs to be looked at again. Ensures we will be fully ready for audit and pass with flying colors.
Read full review
In a previous company, I was hired based on my experience with Workday Adaptive Planning. After being hired and reviewing the company, I quickly determined they were not large of enough of a company to need the program. Instead, we made better Excel budget templates, utilized OneDrive and created a better experience without the cost. Left the job after 9 months because I worked my way out of the position. My next role I looked for bigger companies and had better success with implementation.
Read full review
Pros
  • Tracking of close tasks thanks to the monthly close calendar option
  • Review - tasks are stamped with the reviewer name & date reviewed
  • Ease of review - attachments are uploaded, account balances are populated via communication with the ERP, Note feature allows for review comments
Read full review
  • Version Management. Adaptive lets us manage many versions/scenarios all in one platform with the robust ability to compare them to each other.
  • Processing Performance. With the Elastic Hypercube technology that was implemented a few years back, we can watch changes flow through a complex web of formulas and arrive at an answer within seconds.
  • Audit Trail. Our administrators love the ability to see and report on who made what changes when, which leads to real accountability within the organization.
Read full review
Cons
  • It would be great to see drill down capabilities between account reconciliations/flux analyses that links to our transactional data in our ERP.
  • I would like to see a litte more customization available in the analytics tab to add custom filter drop downs.
  • I believe this is close to being released, but I'd like to see anticipated time commitments on the task level to be able to easily review capacity type reporting/analytics.
Read full review
  • Web reports and sheets are not great for in-depth reporting, and require the use of the OfficeConnect for Excel plugin and, therefore, the use of Excel for extensive reporting capabilities.
  • It has limited formula functionality in some instances, requiring again the use of OfficeConnect for Excel for extensive calculations.
  • I would like to see new planning sheet types or upgrades to existing sheet types; functionality has been the same for over 10 years.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It has proven to enhance our procedures with closing. It is an effective tool that I would recommend to create a more efficient closing procedure and get the team more aligned. It increases the accountability among the staff and helps to keep us on task and on time. It is easy to sign into and has reminder emails for tasks that are coming up or late.
Read full review
For one we're in way too deep to not move forward with Adaptive. We're integrated with Workday, we do a ton of reporting with Adaptive, and it's working very well for planning and forecasting. No reason to look back or change course.
Read full review
Usability
FloQast is incredibly intuitive and easy to use. The only reason I don't give it a 10 is that the Flux Analysis feature is not great in terms of getting the information into the system. Once it's in, fantastic! But some work is needed
Read full review
Workday Adaptive Planning has detailed online help with both articles and videos that are comprehensive. It has a lot of similarities to Excel, which most finance people are already familiar with, plus the user interface is intuitive and easy to pick up. The online support team is quick to respond and very knowledgeable.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
We have only noticed a slight slow down in accessing FloQast on a couple of occasions (near the beginning of a month when many people were likely trying to get online to close their books). The issue has always resolved itself with three to five minutes, so it's never been a hinderance.
Read full review
There haven't been any lately. The only one issue I can think of is when there was an update in Adaptive that altered our reports. Before I realized there was an issue, Adaptive reached out to let me know, so that it could be fixed.
Read full review
Performance
FloQast's performance is great. The pages always load quickly, and reports are completed fast! I've never noticed any slowdown in our ERP from the interface with FloQast.
Read full review
All aspects of Adaptive Insights perform well. One area that I wish was quicker was integration. When importing data from Intacct our accounting ERP platform, it can sometimes take 4 hours for the import to process. The earlier imports are done, the quicker they complete. My estimate for a quick upload is about two hours.
Read full review
Support Rating
They are rapid in their response. If they can't immediately offer a solution, they continue to keep in contact with you to let you know where they are in resolving your issues. The staff is friendly & speaks to you in layman's terms, not so high-tech that you can't understand
Read full review
Whenever we have had any questions, issues, or concerns, the support has been quick and thorough. [This] allow[s] us to be able to fully resolve any issues, or be connected with the right group quickly to attain the result we were after; be it from simple formatting to adding new detailed reporting.
Read full review
In-Person Training
The FloQast team members are just so personable. FloQast has clearly done a great job hiring people who are not just good at what they do, but are also fun to work with! They have placed people in the right roles and the customer benefits from this. I have enjoyed every opportunity I've had to work with a FloQast team member on training.
Read full review
This was extremely helpful so that they could walk you through the model and teach you more about the complexity of various areas. It is most helpful when it is specific to your organization's model. The larger in-person trainings were helpful but they tended to be more generic and entry level. The trainings that are more tailored to your specific needs are the most helpful.
Read full review
Online Training
The online training is good. But like all online, pre-recorded training, it is never quite as good as in-person or live training where one can ask questions or get clarification. That said, FloQast has an extensive training library and most of the time, if one finds they need help on a topic, it can be answered by going to the online training and watching appropriate recording.
Read full review
They often times tended to be way too generic or entry level. They would also become sales pitches to upgrade or get new Adaptive Planning products. The questions in the training would be very niche and specific to other organizations. They were rarely helpful to the group at large.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Implementation occured before I started with the company (but despite the instruction to skip the question if I did not participate, the site required I put in a rating in order to move on to the next page)
Read full review
Trust the expertise of very strong 3rd party implementers. Having deployed Adaptive at a separate company before, I thought I knew it all (hubris, I know). Fortunately, I began to (very quickly) trust the judgment of our Carlson implementation team, and they provided invaluable insights and best-in-class processes that have benefitted me and my team greatly.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I used BlackLine at my previous job. Now I use FloQast at my current job. FloQast is, in my opinion, much easier to use than BlackLine and the looks and feels of the website are more user friendly and visually pleasing. BlackLine seemed like a separate system and was not really connected to Intacct (they used Intacct as well at my previous job). Everything just seemed clumsy with that system. FQ is smoother.
Read full review
For best-in-class capabilities, you'll very likely need to split the various HR and financial systems into separate systems rather than using a consolidated platform like Workday. However, a consolidated platform provides benefits by being a single location for employees and a single system for IT developers to work with. This would need to be compared to employee efficiencies gained by working with better systems.
Read full review
Scalability
We started using it with one client/customer and now use it with fourteen entities and plan to add two more in the next couple of months. It has made it possible to grow our business without hiring additional personnel. We can do more work with the same number of people
Read full review
We went from 2 users to 70+ users over a 2 year period of time. The application scaled wonderfully. 65 of those users were non-finance users so they were able to quickly learn the software and prepare budgets quickly and efficiently. That is the power of Adaptive and its ability to scale
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Has helped to reduce time to close from 7-8 days to 5 days .
  • Allows all entities to follow the same process globally. This has reduced risk and allowed great oversight at the parent entity level.
  • This has allowed the accounting team to provide real-time updates to the CFO and FP&A on close status.
Read full review
  • it is easier to take critical business decisions in the organization and respond to stakeholder early
  • migration of resources like cloud, servers or operating system or migrations does not lead to impact on platform
  • helps calculates complex metrics requires for financial and resource planning
Read full review
ScreenShots

FloQast Screenshots

Screenshot of the analytics that displays progress throughout the closeScreenshot of flux analysisScreenshot of reconciliations

Workday Adaptive Planning Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of the AI Predictive ForecasterScreenshot of the dashboard