Folloze vs. Optimizely Web Experimentation

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Folloze
Score 7.7 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Folloze's no-code digital experience platform enables B2B marketing and sales teams to deliver personalized buyer experiences across the customer journey. It's used to create digital destinations for use cases including ABM/ABX campaigns, website engagement, sales development, and event activation.N/A
Optimizely Web Experimentation
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Whether launching a first test or scaling a sophisticated experimentation program, Optimizely Web Experimentation aims to deliver the insights needed to craft high-performing digital experiences that drive engagement, increase conversions, and accelerate growth.N/A
Pricing
FollozeOptimizely Web Experimentation
Editions & Modules
Folloze
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FollozeOptimizely Web Experimentation
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FollozeOptimizely Web Experimentation
Considered Both Products
Folloze
Chose Folloze
Folloze is a cost-friendly solution that helped in reducing cost and increase ROI (Return On Investment)
The set of features offered in Folloze enables clear view of leads and email engagements
The analytics module provides greater insights over email campaigns
Chose Folloze
Folloze is in a league of it's own when comparing it to previous resources our team has leveraged in the past. The biggest part of this statement really comes down to the integration piece. Whether it's Google Analytics or Marketo, Folloze has truly set the bar on being able to …
Chose Folloze
We have not used other products quite like Folloze.
Chose Folloze
Folloze is a much easier platform to use compared to Pathfactory. The platform is more intuitive, and there is greater functionality.
Chose Folloze
Folloze offers much more robust and sophisticated solutions compared to Pathfactory. The microsite building experience is moons ahead of Pathfactory and is far more intuitive. The user experience is much more friendly and easy on the brain. I don't often find myself getting …
Chose Folloze
Folloze has proven to absolutely stand head and shoulders above its competitors. Folloze actually integrates nicely with 6Sense or Demandbase to pull data from a CRM. Folloze seemed to have a simpler interface, and that was key when it came to enabling our sales org to use …
Chose Folloze
Cannot comment as I was not part of the ultimate decisionmaking process.
Chose Folloze
Folloze does so much more than the other tools we evaluated, like PathFactory and Uberflip. Those other solutions are more of a content repository with AI to help guide the visitor's experience. While this is powerful, Folloze goes a step further by making a full web page …
Chose Folloze
In looking at solutions that are robust, Folloze was selected because it was very simple to use. As I have mentioned, we had our first page done in a week. Looking at other solutions that are just a piece of software meant for other tasks, they had significant setup, greater …
Chose Folloze
Folloze is a lot easier to use vs. Drupal when building out pages. The look of Drupal is not as pleasing to the eyes as the way you can customize it on Folloze. Folloze also does not require any coding, so it takes away the complication and chances of "missed codes" or errors …
Chose Folloze
Folloze has a much better interface with creating microsites. PathFactory has a lot of good content stream goals, but as far as microsites and template, Folloze has more experience and capability to make it an easier and more scalable solution.
Chose Folloze
Folloze as a tool was actually integrated into our Dun & Bradstreet Rev.Up subscription, which means we're able to collect additional visitor data that's available on the D&B side when someone visits our Folloze pages. As compared to Marketo landing pages, or UnBounce, …
Chose Folloze
We never got too far evaluating PathFactory and I ultimately chose Folloze because it was a partner to Terminus, who we were already using for ABM.
Chose Folloze
We only selected folloze because it was easy, effective and understandable, and even the folloze team was helpful to make us understand. We thank folloze being such a great support & partner with our projects and seasonal campaigns. Adding pixels will be a game changer.Thank …
Chose Folloze
PathFactory was not as great a creator or user experience. The page layouts were limiting and more difficult to measure in terms of user engagement. The look was not as clean an modern.
Chose Folloze
Our company has an MSA with Folloze. However, we are pushing them to meet our needs better for each sub-department.
Chose Folloze
I am not part of the purchasing decision or evaluation process. I am just a user, and I haven't used anything like this before.
Chose Folloze
More intuitive user experience, price point, and CSM options aligned to our budget.
Chose Folloze
N/A- I was not a part of the selection process for Folloze so I cannot answer this.
Chose Folloze
We reviewed Folloze against path factory and Adobe but found the platforms to be less agile, and the ability to get started would require significant resources and timelines. We found Folloze to have great intent connections and focused more on being a landing page than a …
Optimizely Web Experimentation
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
The ability to do A/B testing in Optimizely along with the associated statistical modelling and audience segmentation means it is a much better solution than using something like Google Analytics were a lot more effort is required to identify and isolate the specific data you …
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
I do not have any issues with AB Tasty. They are great. We went with Optimizely because they have several other products that will work together with our business model. Optimizely has grown and it now offers many other products that work with experimentation like CMS, CMP, ODP …
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Google Optimize and Hotjar
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Optimizely is highly intuitive, allowing marketers or non-technical folks to run experiments without complicated coding. It also allows for various types of experimentation, including A/B tests, multivariate tests, and personalization. This capability will enable teams to run …
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
This is a platform that was already implemented when I started with my current company.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
The feature set and ecosystem for Optimizely seemed much more robust and scalable.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
None of them have a best in class stats engine and live within an ecosystem of marketing technology products the way that Optimizely does, so the scalability of using any one of those tools is limited as compared to using Optimizely Web Experimentation.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
It's a lot more, well, site stacked, it's way better than that. Adobe Target. I think the UI is easier to use on Optimizely. The one thing that I would say comparatively is our analytics talking to each other. Obviously Adobe, we use Adobe Analytics and Adobe Target, so they …
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Optimizely is more user-friendly and cost-effective, ideal for experimentation-focused teams, while Adobe Target excels in advanced personalization and seamless integration within the Adobe ecosystem, making it better suited for large enterprises.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
We analyzed a few competitors and optimizely had the most robust feature set and scalability
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
I feel Optimizely Web Experimentation stacked up well against Split
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
We haven't used other Optimizely products apart from Web Experimentation.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Optimizely Web Experimentation was more robust and able to handle the broad array of sites we run than VWO. It has been a great platform to easily add additional sites onto, but still providing a universal overview of all of them, making management a simple task.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
we used Optimizely Web Experimentation then AB Tasty but came back to Optimizley because of its robust stat sig and features as well as all of the products we will be able to work in synchronization.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
We use both, it just depends on the use case. I personally prefer feature experimentation but I see why both are useful.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Optimizely Web Experimentation has more robust product for experimentation specialists than VWO
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Handshake by Shopify (discontinued)
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Better tools but more expensive
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
It exists unlike google optimize
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Optimizely Web Experimentation appeared to be much more user friendly and easier to self-manage than AB Tasty
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
I think that Optimizely Web Experimentation is much easier to implement and use, but the entire Adobe Experience Cloud provides a ton of value if you have multiple products.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Honestly, Optimizely Web Experimentation has its pros and cons just like any other tool. We use Optimizely because we have resources here in the country that can help us when e have issues. The support team being local helps a lot so we don't have long wait times to get things …
Features
FollozeOptimizely Web Experimentation
Engagement
Comparison of Engagement features of Product A and Product B
Folloze
7.7
Ratings
5% below category average
Optimizely Web Experimentation
-
Ratings
Automated routing and prioritization7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer interaction histories7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Syndicated content7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Personalization8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Engagement data tracking7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Ad Campaigns
Comparison of Ad Campaigns features of Product A and Product B
Folloze
7.4
Ratings
5% below category average
Optimizely Web Experimentation
-
Ratings
Ad campaign creation7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Display advertising7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Contextual advertising7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Social advertising7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Ad reporting and analytics7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Folloze
7.5
Ratings
9% below category average
Optimizely Web Experimentation
8.2
Ratings
4% below category average
Standard visitor segmentation7.40 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation7.60 Ratings7.70 Ratings
ABM sales intelligence7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Website personalization00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Intent Data
Comparison of Intent Data features of Product A and Product B
Folloze
7.1
Ratings
9% below category average
Optimizely Web Experimentation
-
Ratings
3rd party intent signals6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Downstream intent signals7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Account identification7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
ABM Integrations
Comparison of ABM Integrations features of Product A and Product B
Folloze
7.5
Ratings
11% below category average
Optimizely Web Experimentation
-
Ratings
Automated workflow & orchestration7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Folloze
-
Ratings
Optimizely Web Experimentation
8.0
Ratings
3% below category average
a/b experiment testing00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Split URL testing00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Multivariate testing00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Cross-browser testing00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Mobile app testing00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Test significance00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Advanced code editor00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Page surveys00 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Visitor recordings00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Preview mode00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Test duration calculator00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Experiment scheduler00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Client-side tests00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Server-side tests00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Folloze
-
Ratings
Optimizely Web Experimentation
8.3
Ratings
1% below category average
Heatmap tool00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Click analytics00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Scroll maps00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Form fill analysis00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Conversion tracking00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Goal tracking00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Test reporting00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Results segmentation00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
CSV export00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
FollozeOptimizely Web Experimentation
Small Businesses
Dealfront
Dealfront
Score 8.6 out of 10
Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
TechTarget Priority Engine
TechTarget Priority Engine
Score 9.8 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
TechTarget Priority Engine
TechTarget Priority Engine
Score 9.8 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FollozeOptimizely Web Experimentation
Likelihood to Recommend
7.4
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.2
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.3
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.4
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
4.5
(0 ratings)
3.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
5.5
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
5.5
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
FollozeOptimizely Web Experimentation
Likelihood to Recommend
I have been using Folloze for a long time, and I will recommend Folloze because of the app's user-friendly interface and responsiveness to customer feedback. It also enhances security with SSO, two-factor authentication, and a personalization tool. Overall, there are more pros, and it increases productivity.
Read full review
I think it can serve the whole spectrum of experiences from people who are just getting used to web experimentation. It's really easy to pick up and use. If you're more experienced then it works well because it just gets out of the way and lets you really focus on the experimentation side of things. So yeah, strongly recommend. I think it is well suited both to small businesses and large enterprises as well. I think it's got a really low barrier to entry. It's very easy to integrate on your website and get results quickly. Likewise, if you are a big business, it's incrementally adoptable, so you can start out with one component of optimizing and you can build there and start to build in things like data CMS to augment experimentation as well. So it's got a really strong a pathway to grow your MarTech platform if you're a small company or a big company.
Read full review
Pros
  • Plug into Salesforce. We live in Salesforce, so it's a must!
  • Ease of use when designing boards. We love to all feel like graphic designers.
  • Dashboards showing activity levels of all types.
  • Storing assets within folloze. Makes it super easy to build a board fast.
  • Cloning boards. Time saver!!
Read full review
  • The Platform contains drag-and-drop editor options for creating variations, which ease the A/B tests process, as it does not require any coding or development resources.
  • Establishing it is so simple that even a non-technical person can do it perfectly.
  • It provides real-time results and analytics with robust dashboard access through which you can quickly analyze how different variations perform. With this, your team can easily make data-driven decisions Fastly.
Read full review
Cons
  • Integrating the contact form with our CRM has been a lengthy and on-going process
  • We use iframe for some of our content pieces and I think it could look better than it does now
  • We need licenses for our salespeople for them to get access to insights of a board. An easier way to send them this info without them needing licenses would be nice
Read full review
  • The results view is dense and difficult to package easily for leadership, and when filtering by segment it's hard to read comparative outcomes without clearing or swapping filters
  • The organization of experiments and statuses is a cluttered list and the search is limited in use - would love to see that improve with time
  • There are so many other MarTech products out there, would love to see more dedicated integrations so we don't have to invest in something like Zapier or Tray to build hacky automations
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Without Folloze, the marketing team would not be able to pivot as quickly as we do to support sellers with deal acceleration and drive executive engagement.
Read full review
Because it's an incredible and essential tool for my line of work as a conversion optimization specialist. Really couldn't do my job nearly as effectively without it. It's paid for itself many times over and I feel like I'm only beginning to unlock the tools potential.
Read full review
Usability
Its great to be able to customize and build experiences without having to depend web developers or larger content teams. Using Folloze doesn't require a web developer or complicated coding language. Its quite intuitive and easy to figure out after building an experience or two. If you are stuck their support and training materials are quite helpful, as is their support team. Although the tool is great, it would be great to see even more customization possibilities. Also the reporting interface is pretty cumbersome and would benefit from added functionality.
Read full review
Optimizely Web Experimentation's visual editor is handy for non-technical or quick iterative testing. When it comes to content changes it's as easy as going into wordpress, clicking around, and then seeing your changes live--what you see is what you get. The preview and approval process for sharing built experiments is also handy for sharing experiments across teams for QA purposes or otherwise.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
sometimes its not loading pages proper, sometimes some functions are not working within or you need a long time to find out image sizes etc
Read full review
I would rate Optimizely Web Experimentation's availability as a 10 out of 10. The software is reliable and does not experience any application errors or unplanned outages. Additionally, the customer service and technical support teams are always available to help with any issues or questions.
Read full review
Performance
pages load slow sometimes
Read full review
I would rate Optimizely Web Experimentation's performance as a 9 out of 10. Pages load quickly, reports are complete in a reasonable time frame, and the software does not slow down any other software or systems that it integrates with. Additionally, the customer service and technical support teams are always available to help with any issues or questions.
Read full review
Support Rating
Folloze has a very intuitive user interface and designer. Their integrations have been seamless, and their team has been extremely helpful and responsive in getting features added or any gaps addressed. We have been leveraging the tool to its full capability, and people are happy both internally as well as externally.
Read full review
They always are quick to respond, and are so friendly and helpful. They always answer the phone right away. And [they are] always willing to not only help you with your problem, but if you need ideas they have suggestions as well.
Read full review
Online Training
5 as we did it with our own people in house and not with Folloze
Read full review
The tool itself is not very difficult to use so training was not very useful in my opinion. It did not also account for success events more complex than a click (which my company being ecommerce is looking to examine more than a mere click).
Read full review
Implementation Rating
I was not involved with the implementation of Folloze. This project was executed before I was hired
Read full review
The implementation through the tag management system took a bit of trial and error at first, mostly due to the asynchronous nature of the TMS. We had to manipulate the implementation to assure that the Optimizely code was written to the page at the right time to allow the experiment content load in the browser without showing any of the original content first. We also needed to make some adjustments to the TMS code to get the integration with Site Catalyst timed appropriately.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Folloze offers much more robust and sophisticated solutions compared to PathFactory. The microsite building experience is moons ahead of PathFactory and is far more intuitive. The user experience is much more friendly and easy on the brain. I don't often find myself getting lost in Folloze, whereas I would get lost all the time in PathFactory.
Read full review
The ability to do A/B testing in Optimizely along with the associated statistical modelling and audience segmentation means it is a much better solution than using something like Google Analytics were a lot more effort is required to identify and isolate the specific data you need to confidently make changes
Read full review
Scalability
there are still a lot of things that need to be made available within the product
Read full review
It's incredibly flexible and adapts well to organizations of all sizes, whether you’re running a single site or managing multiple departments and platforms. The ability to deploy experiments seamlessly across different environments is a huge plus, especially for growing businesses. While it’s highly scalable, the last point would depend on the right team leveraging its full potential.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • A sales were able to give valuable presentations which aided in earning key accounts in O&G & utility industries.
  • A sales exec was able to close a million-dollar sale that she had been working on closing for a year. This board was a great visual to the customer, which helped in closing.
Read full review
  • we saved money by not implementing certain copy/design
  • we learned that customers from different states react different to a variation
  • we are slowly learning where conversion happens and where to fix the frictions
  • Testing shorter vs longer journeys increased funnel conversion in some states - we avoided implementing this nationwide
Read full review
ScreenShots

Folloze Screenshots

Screenshot of The Folloze Buyer Experience Platform.

Folloze harnesses buyer insights, sales orchestration and AI to empower sales and marketing teams. It is used to create personalized experiences and micro-targeted campaigns that engages today’s B2B buyer across the entire customer journey.Screenshot of Collaborative Marketing and Sales motions.

Folloze provides a ‘closed loop’ orchestration process to target, orchestrate, personalize and measure tailored account experiences. These micro-targeted campaigns increase engagement to impact revenue across the customer lifecycle.Screenshot of Folloze page views, opens and clicks.

Folloze produces insights that measure a target customers’ interest in offerings, such as number and duration of content views, forwarding or sharing, call-to-action executions, which ones they share with colleagues – for each and every asset they engage with throughout their journey.Screenshot of the interface to build microsites and landing pages.

B2B marketer can launch sophisticated, ‍personalized buyer journeys that let target audiences choose what relevant content interests them, without guessing what buyers will like.Screenshot of Account Engagement Analytics
Folloze analytics aggregates engagement activities by account and contact across all touchpoints. Sellers and marketing teams understand account topics of interest, can measure the impact and ROI of their account-based marketing programs, and inform campaign strategy and next best actions.Screenshot of Intelligent content nomination.

Folloze offers artificial intelligence to recommend content at both build time as well as in real-time, and automatically delivers relevant and high performing content, dynamic messaging, and specific imagery, that accounts and contacts will find valuable and engaging.

Optimizely Web Experimentation Screenshots

Screenshot of AI-Powered Experimentation with Opal:

- Instant Test Ideas: Generates high-quality A/B test ideas based on any goals and audience insights.
- Smarter Experimentation: The AI can suggest impactful variations, reducing guesswork and increasing test velocity.
- More Than Just Ideas: From hypothesis generation to analyzing results, Opal helps optimize every stage of the experimentation process.Screenshot of the Web Experimentation Visual Editor :

- Tweak experiments using the visual editor or dive into custom code when needed.
- Modify elements, update styling, or add dynamic behaviors.
- Ensure perfect variations while keeping control over every detail of the experiment.Screenshot of AI Content Suggestions:

- Generates copy variations to supercharge experiments.
- The AI suggests high-impact messaging for tests when hovering over a field.
- AI-powered content suggestions help skip the brainstorming process.Screenshot of Advanced Audience Targeting:

- Delivers personalized experiences by targeting users based on behaviors, attributes, and real-time conditions.
- Defines precise audience segments using first-party data, geolocation, and device type.
- Can test and optimize for different audience groups to maximize impact and engagement.Screenshot of Custom Templates in the Visual Editor:

- Offers pre-built templates for common test setups.
- Standardized variations and maintains brand integrity with reusable templates.
- Templates can be customized visually or tweak them with code for full flexibility.Screenshot of the Web Experimentation Results Page:

- Data visualizations help interpret experiment performance.
- Displays which variations are winning with built-in statistical significance calculations.
- Results can be filtered by audience segments, events, and conversions to uncover key trends.