Foxtrot RPA (discontinued) vs. SAP Build

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Foxtrot RPA (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Nintex RPA LE, which was based on Foxtrot powered by Enablesoft, was a suite of robotic process automation (RPA) software solutions. Foxtrot is now discontinued.
$85
per month
SAP Build
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
SAP Build is a business application development and automation solution with a comprehensive suite of low-code, pro-code, and generative AI tools. SAP Build is for developers, IT professionals, and business users/citizen developers who want to create and customize business applications.
$1.82
per month per user
Pricing
Foxtrot RPA (discontinued)SAP Build
Editions & Modules
Nintex RPA Standard
$85.00
per month
Nintex RPA Enterprise (includes Workflow)
$135.00
per month
SAP Build Process Automation - Standard User
$1.82
per month per user
SAP Build Process Automation - Advanced User
$15
per month per user
SAP Build Process Automation - Attended Automation
$534
per month
SAP Build Process Automation - Unattended Automation
$534
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Foxtrot RPA (discontinued)SAP Build
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Foxtrot RPA (discontinued)SAP Build
Considered Both Products
Foxtrot RPA (discontinued)
Chose Foxtrot RPA (discontinued)
Fiserv has a program to do mass changes. However, this product does not support all features within the Navigator platform. Plus that mapping program would only work within Navigator. We can use Foxtrot in multiple applications and websites. Plus comparing the cost of Foxtrot …
Chose Foxtrot RPA (discontinued)
Foxtrot does not have nearly as much in terms of functionality and workflow tools. It is primarily meant for automating and creating scripts that help with mainframe-based maintenance and migration tasks. In addition, it is very efficient in simulating the actions of an …
SAP Build
Chose SAP Build
Compared to Mendix, we decided not to go for low code application building and in the other parts of Build, Build is stronger and better integrated with SAP. On the hand of Coding, using Build Code, gives us Joule, which understands SAP better and also have a tighter and more …
Chose SAP Build
It is a great product for application development
Chose SAP Build
As per clean core it's regarding
Chose SAP Build
We prefer to use SAP Build to help our SAP customers due to its native connectivity, integration, and seamless experience.
Chose SAP Build
We are also using Uipath for RPA automation; I believe it works better for complex processes than SAP Build, but its functionalities are limited to RPA. SAP Build also offers functionalities around Workflow, which is lacking in Uipath. So, it is still OK in processes like …
Chose SAP Build
Well, all these tools are designed for different purposes. So there are no Comparisions. I will completely use one tool for sales forecasting and then other tool for data automation.
Chose SAP Build
SAP Build stands out in comparison to other tools due to its comprehensive features and user-friendly interface. We selected SAP Build for its robust capabilities in facilitating the design and prototyping phases of our projects. The tool's versatility allows for efficient …
Chose SAP Build
Too Limited in functionallitys at the moment to be really production ready
Chose SAP Build
Because SAP Build has it all in a single place and service
Chose SAP Build
UiPath has better integrations in terms of third party applications but SAP Build seems to be catching up pretty quickly
Chose SAP Build
Mendix and Neptune also provides platform when apps can be created efficiently without have any prior programming skills but SAP Build Process Automation is where SAP excels.
Features
Foxtrot RPA (discontinued)SAP Build
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
Foxtrot RPA (discontinued)
-
Ratings
SAP Build
8.0
Ratings
5% below category average
Visual Modeling00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Drag-and-drop Interfaces00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Platform Security00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Platform User Management00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Reusability00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Platform Scalability00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Foxtrot RPA (discontinued)SAP Build
Small Businesses
airSlate WorkFlow
airSlate WorkFlow
Score 7.5 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
SAP Extension Suite (discontinued)
SAP Extension Suite (discontinued)
Score 8.3 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
UiPath Automation Platform
UiPath Automation Platform
Score 8.7 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Foxtrot RPA (discontinued)SAP Build
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Foxtrot RPA (discontinued)SAP Build
Likelihood to Recommend
Nintex is well-suited for any application that does not have record import features.
Read full review
SAP Build is a strong and reliable partner with a rich FAQ and consulting power. New features make sense and are easy to distribute within the team and to end users. The community is nice, and there are many discussions on product development, shared solutions, and productivity improvements. UI is also one of the strongest points.
Read full review
Pros
  • Mass updating of account records.
  • Works well scraping data from web sites.
  • Can update any type of electronic record/application.
Read full review
  • Its drag and drop editor is even simpler than the very popular WordPress
  • No code feature to build any type of website
  • Not a lot of technical expertise is required to use this tool
  • The client loves it as they can themselves use it for quick tweaks
Read full review
Cons
  • It could use better handling of emulator response times and states. For example, oftentimes the tool moves faster than the emulator can perform tasks and the whole process can crash, forcing the user to start over.
  • It could use a drag and drop workflow interface, which might make it easier to create complex scripts.
Read full review
  • Firstly there is a scope to reduce the pricing so that it can be more affordable.
  • The customer support team is bit slow so it takes some time to get the answers for your queries.
  • The integration is not so straightforward and it takes good amount of time.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Foxtrot is the best data automation software on the market. Especially for the price and cost savings. I have been able to do so much data integrity clean up over the years to keep our system clean.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
No answers on this topic
Because I think it is fairly easy to navigate. But at the same time, I still think it’s not mature enough for non-developers. At least for our use cases, it has been needed to perform coding in some sense. But ofc. I think joule will help a lot here.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
There are, for example, great blog writings about automation cases and examples. The studio version is updated often. There are also useful OpenSAP online courses.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Foxtrot does not have nearly as much in terms of functionality and workflow tools. It is primarily meant for automating and creating scripts that help with mainframe-based maintenance and migration tasks. In addition, it is very efficient in simulating the actions of an individual for daily and manual tasks. We selected Foxtrot because it was the tool that was recommended by the main vendor we needed to interface with, and industry-wide it was the main tool being used by other financial institutions with similar platforms to perform the tasks that we bought the platform to perform.
Read full review
Compared to Mendix, we decided not to go for low code application building and in the other parts of Build, Build is stronger and better integrated with SAP. On the hand of Coding, using Build Code, gives us Joule, which understands SAP better and also have a tighter and more secure coupling with SAP services.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • As previously mentioned, Foxtrot has allowed us to become infinitely more efficient in handling mass maintenance scenarios within the organization. It has allowed us to go from development to deployment often within a couple of days including testing.
  • It has further allowed for the remote automation of manual tasks performed on a daily basis and freed up that time so that the resources can be more efficient within their functions and get more things done.
  • The tool has allowed for the creation of several template scripts that can be utilized anytime for similar situations, which has made us even more efficient in that the development of the script only happens one time and provides for infinite uses without any additional overhead.
Read full review
  • SAP Build significantly reduces the effort on the integration side compared to other LCNC platforms.
  • From a licensing perspective, the platform can kind of lock you in, but that's also true for other cloud platforms as well.
  • Creating an app that fully works with your ERP (especially if you have S4HANA as the ERP System) is fast. It enables quick prototyping.
Read full review
ScreenShots

SAP Build Screenshots

Screenshot of The SAP Build Portfolio, which includes:
1- SAP Build Apps to create business application
2- SAP Build Process Automation to automate end to end business processes
3- SAP Build Work Zone to design and create business sites