FreeAgent vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
FreeAgent
Score 6.5 out of 10
N/A
FreeAgent is an cloud-based accounting system designed for small businesses and freelancers. FreeAgent supports many core accounting features and bank reconciliation, payroll, tax management, project level accounting, and multiple currency support. It is mobile-accessible, and integrates with many apps.
$13.50
per month
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A
Pricing
FreeAgentMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Editions & Modules
FreeAgent
$13.50
per month
FreeAgent
$135
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FreeAgentMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FreeAgentMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Considered Both Products
FreeAgent
Chose FreeAgent
Our clients use all of the above software providers, some of them using Xero, QuickBooks, FreshBooks, QuickFile, Kashflow, Wave App etc. FreeAgent is best one for me among the free software available as it does everything and we would not even need additional software for …
Chose FreeAgent
Xero is a product I have only used for Payroll, but which it does very well. It is more complex to use compared to FreeAgent though and in that regard harder to learn.
Chose FreeAgent
As a free software for Mettle users it is excellent choice and great value for money especially for micro businesses. It does the needed bank imports and reconciliations, however compared to more advanced products like Xero or QuickBooks it lacks the flexibility of those …
Chose FreeAgent
I have used and tested out many other systems. I was looking at Xero for my accounting system but at the time I chose FreeAgent because of the way it handles the recording of dividends and the inbuilt time recording. The others I trialed were good and many of them cheaper. …
Chose FreeAgent
I haven't used other products, I used freeagent and was so impressed that I've continued to use it and recommend to other
Chose FreeAgent
I liked FreshBooks - but the support, banking integration and other extras FreeAgent offers won me over.
Chose FreeAgent
FreeAgent was really the first product we looked at based on a personal recommendation and since we found it to be almost perfect we didn't look at the alternatives.
Chose FreeAgent
I found FreeAgent to be more user friendly and since I have no accounting background much more easy to use than QuickBooks.
Chose FreeAgent
We did start the business using Kashflow. It is good but isn't as full service as FreeAgent and does require a bit of knowledge of some accounting terms which FreeAgent doesn't.
Chose FreeAgent
FreeAgent is far easier to use and navigate.
Chose FreeAgent
I've not evaluated other products but know there are others out there.
Chose FreeAgent
Support. Any questions gets a fast and detailed response. Helpful, knowledgable and friendly people provide detailed explanations and answers to not only teach but help understanding.
Chose FreeAgent
Sage was way too complicated for my needs and not as user friendly. FreeAgent was cheaper, easier and more user friendly. Easy decision
Chose FreeAgent
I used Fresh Books for about three years prior to switching to FreeAgent. It was the accounting functionality that made the difference - in the past two years I've not regretted the switch. Fresh Books is good, but its the UK accounting features that make FreeAgent …
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
It is more powerful in features and ease of use as Microsoft GP provides an intuitive user interface leading to quicker adoption.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Xero is easier to use, closer to Quickbooks. Most of the background GL is automated, where as in GP it is not.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Due to the size of our company Microsoft Dynamics GP works better for us than Quickbooks because of the reporting capabilities. However, the NetSuite demo proved to be much more user-friendly with more reporting capabilities.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Because GP doesn't do CRM we have looked at D365 Customer Engagement for our field service, and F&O as a replacement. Vaporware, no direct upgrade path, and if you want to continue with GP for your back office and just use Field Service it's an insanely complex integration …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Quickbooks, SAP, and Netsuite. We are a small-sized business so Dynamics GP is better for our business.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
There are more features and products overall in the Microsoft package at a better price point. Overall, Salesforce has a much sleeker and more user-friendly design.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
We moved from Epicor Eagle N Series to Dynamics GP as an accounting solution for our new POS system. I believe Dynamics GP has more options to create and present financial statements for a large company with many regions and districts. However, because of the weakness of our …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
They both accomplish the same thing, I think Oracle was what I first learned and thus making the change to Microsoft Dynamics GP just took a little bit of time to learn the technology. After you get the hang of it, it becomes much easier and I taught my coworkers how to use it.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
I did not pick Dynamics over Salesforce, my company was using it and eventually switched over to Salesforce. I would say that Dynamics is user-friendly and the interface is quite easy to understand. I really like the reporting capabilities as well. Once again, the aesthetic …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
GP is more robust than QuickBooks bar none.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
At the time of purchase, Microsoft Dynamics GP seemed more appropriate and more in sync with the needs of our company. The software was more responsive, user-friendly and it allowed for more flexibility with the way it was intended to be used. We were also promised better …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
My recollection of Quickbooks pro isn't great, and it was over 10 years ago. Obviously many things have changed in that time frame, so any comparison would likely not be relevant.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
The only product with have shopped was Sage Intacct. It is somewhat unfair to compare the two solutions, because Sage Intacct is a cloud-based solution. That said, Intacct appears to advertise better reporting/business intelligence capabilities. MS Dynamics GP should be aware …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Microsoft Dynamics GP is one of the best ERP's for a medium or small business in the market today. When we were looking for the right software, it had already a connection developed with our 3rd party logistics system, so the decision was pretty easy since the logistic / supply …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Dynamics GP is much more flexible and enterprise-oriented than Quickbooks Pro or similar software. It can support many more users and scenarios. However it requires more dedicated infrastructure (such as servers and databases) and more dedicated IT resources to maintain and …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
I love Dayforce for payroll. It has been configured to meet all our needs, is user-friendly and the customer support is fantastic. We originally moved from MDGP payroll to Ceridian Insync payroll due to the issues we had. We upgraded to Dayforce and are very happy with the …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Learning GP with so many resources from the GP community has been easy. Someone always has the answer or suggestions to point me in the right direction. I've had very few instances where the systems caused an error that required research in order to fix the glitch.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
We looked at several general ledger software packages. We had excellent customer service and implementation guidance through a third party. Having a knowledgeable consultant is critical to a successful implementation.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Quickbooks Pro and GP are not on the same playing field. GP is a full account system adhering to GAAP, while QuickBooks is designed for the small business market. While starting out with QuickBooks is easy, if you plan to grow, you will soon outgrow it.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Microsoft Dynamics is a good, easy to use product for entities that do not have advanced manufacturing.
If I were to go into a distribution or service type business I would highly recommend it.
If I were to go into an advanced manufacturing environment I would not consider GP.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
More user friendly in certain areas and much more cost effective to manage and support
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
TechSoup had great privcing, I had experince with GP in previous companys and there are a lot of staff accountants who have relevant experience.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Selected because of Intercompany workflow, consolidated reporting functionality, system controls, available modules for fixed assets and inventory. GP was the best value for the points mentioned.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Does not stack up against SAP as it does not have the level of flexibility offered by SAP. JD Edwards software was awful, no comparison.
Features
FreeAgentMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
FreeAgent
8.6
Ratings
11% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.6
Ratings
16% below category average
Pay calculation8.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration8.50 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files8.90 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management8.80 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Reimbursement management8.70 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
FreeAgent
6.7
Ratings
13% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.0
Ratings
9% below category average
API for custom integration4.50 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Plug-ins8.90 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
FreeAgent
8.5
Ratings
2% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.5
Ratings
25% below category average
Single sign-on capability9.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
FreeAgent
6.4
Ratings
21% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
Ratings
16% below category average
Dashboards7.10 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Standard reports7.60 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Custom reports4.40 Ratings6.00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
FreeAgent
8.7
Ratings
11% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
Ratings
15% below category average
Accounts payable8.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable8.50 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Cash management8.50 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation9.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Expense management8.90 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Time tracking9.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Fixed asset management8.60 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Multi-currency support8.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Multi-division support9.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Regulations compliance8.70 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing9.10 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Self-service portal9.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations8.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Localizations00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Standardized Processes00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
FreeAgent
7.4
Ratings
1% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.8
Ratings
8% below category average
Inventory tracking7.70 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Automatic reordering8.20 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Location management4.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Manufacturing module9.10 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
FreeAgent
8.1
Ratings
5% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
Ratings
14% below category average
Pricing8.10 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Order entry6.80 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Credit card processing8.20 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold9.10 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Order Orchestration00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
FreeAgentMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Small Businesses
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 8.9 out of 10
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.0 out of 10
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Score 8.6 out of 10
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FreeAgentMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.9
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.2
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
FreeAgentMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Likelihood to Recommend
For micro and small business it is a great solution. The new requirements for MTD for landlords could also be met with this software. Groups and more complex businesses could not use the accounts and tax returns features, however they still could use it for bookkeeping and then export the data to other tax and accounts production software.
Read full review
It does accounting really well, it does payroll not so well. I say this because when you get into states that have complicated payroll laws like California, overtime calculations are hard to setup and get right. Same goes for other states when they do out of the normal pay structure like piece rate pay. It does HR, A/P and A/R really well and we have had no issues on that side; just payroll when it comes to certain states and how we do anything that is not salary or hourly.
Read full review
Pros
  • Recurring invoices with automated follow-up is fantastic for helping to get paid on time
  • Automated bank transfers are the easiest way to ensure that I can reconcile my accounts with ease
  • Support is fantastic
  • Built-in Time tracking for projects/tasks (integration with Basecamp to get this info) is fantastic, it allows us to accurately track what we are working on and get paid for it!
Read full review
  • User friendly interface
  • Able to be extended into multiple areas of your business
  • One feature we have been using for a few years is EFT for payables - it has significantly reduced the time spent paying vendors and reduced our check printing and mailing costs. It is very easy to setup and use.
Read full review
Cons
  • Reporting on financials, time tracking and project status is a little poor. It's adequate for what what we need, but would be great to see more advanced features.
  • API is quite closed so cannot integrate with our other project management tools.
Read full review
  • Having an integration between Project Accounting and Field Service would be amazing! There are so many companies that have service technicians that perform work on a customer's contract but also have a need for project accounting functionality within that customer's contract. Right now those modules are separate so you either need to use one or duplicate some efforts if you need to use both.
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP could do a better job documenting their new enhancements to the product. They realize great enhancements but the documentation about them, or new products, is lacking so it is difficult as a consultant to know everything a new feature can do for me and my customers.
  • They could enhance their forecasting capabilities with a new forecasting tool within Management Reporter.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We have used Freeagent for many years now and it serves us well for our needs. To change it would mean a lot of work, and this would most likely only happen if the cost became prohibitive to us.
Read full review
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Read full review
Usability
It is a great software that does everything we need for small business clients. It allows to keep the books in a cloud from bookkeeping to accounts production and tax returns, all in one software. There are no major drawbacks and I would highly recommend it for most of our clients.
Read full review
Overall usability of the older model is not quite so user friendly for the basic bookeeper, but at an accountants level we can generate all the necessary reports and create Sales Orders, Purchase orders and invoices - though it is a bit redundant to enter the sales and purchase orders separately instead of being able to convert a sales order directly to a puchase order by applying a price book like the newer versions can.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Based in a cloud and never had any issues with down time. I can access from any device
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I have never personally used support
Read full review
The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Did not participate
Read full review
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I used Fresh Books for about three years prior to switching to FreeAgent. It was the accounting functionality that made the difference - in the past two years I've not regretted the switch. Fresh Books is good, but its the UK accounting features that make FreeAgent indispensable to my business.
Read full review
Because GP doesn't do CRM we have looked at D365 Customer Engagement for our field service, and F&O as a replacement. Vaporware, no direct upgrade path, and if you want to continue with GP for your back office and just use Field Service it's an insanely complex integration import/export. D365 F&O is a huge implementation cost, and without a direct migration path every bit of data has to be custom imported. There really is no straightforward way to stack up GP against these programs currently. Again, the future of GP is in some doubt.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Has freed up a lot of time based on my previous system of managing my invoicing and accounts through Word and Excel
  • I have an accurate day to day handle on the financial position of my business so I can manage my cashflow better
  • The inbuilt time recording against projects has saved time in creating the invoices but also tracks my profitability on the work I do
Read full review
  • If implemented properly, the product can save many hours of data entry time - specifically by setting up integrations of large data sets.
  • Many times the underlying business process must be adjusted to accommodate software limitations. By being flexible, a company can leverage their users' skills in combination with GP to make data entry faster and more efficient. I have seen many companies eliminate the need for data entry personnel as well as reallocate employee hours to more skilled positions such as reporting and analytics.
  • Poor implementations, on the other hand, can cause employees to hate their jobs and the software. This isn't specific to GP but to the software industry in general.
Read full review
ScreenShots