GeneXus vs. SAP Build

Perhaps scientific research applications are not the best scenario to use GeneXus, but particularly many scenarios can be used from different fields, commerce, production, business intelligence, advertising, media, etc., I cannot think of any scenario in that GeneXus cannot work effectively.

Incentivized

SAP Build is a strong and reliable partner with a rich FAQ and consulting power. New features make sense and are easy to distribute within the team and to end users. The community is nice, and there are many discussions on product development, shared solutions, and productivity improvements. UI is also one of the strongest points.

Incentivized

• Helps create complex software solutions in different platforms/architectures such as Web, Mobile, Cloud, ChatBots, Desktop, etc.
• Once you have achieved a seniority level of experience you can get up to 10x faster than traditional programming (Java, .NET, etc.).
• Lets you concentrate on the business while the tool provides technical solutions that automatize software development
• It has a great complements such as WorkWithPlus that boost GeneXus' productivity

• Its drag and drop editor is even simpler than the very popular WordPress
• No code feature to build any type of website
• Not a lot of technical expertise is required to use this tool
• The client loves it as they can themselves use it for quick tweaks

Incentivized

• Some errors at building time that are difficult to figure out. In the deployment and executions, sometimes you get errors not easy to figure out.
• Now it's fast, but when you create a large solution, it slows down.

• Firstly there is a scope to reduce the pricing so that it can be more affordable.
• The customer support team is bit slow so it takes some time to get the answers for your queries.
• The integration is not so straightforward and it takes good amount of time.

Incentivized

Usability of the tool by a developer who is well trained in the use of GeneXus and with good judgment is excellent. It allows them to know good practices in the generation of code for the database as well as for the backend and the frontend. It allows us to achieve better standardization within the development team and to present solutions and solve complex problems in a very simple way.

Because I think it is fairly easy to navigate. But at the same time, I still think it’s not mature enough for non-developers. At least for our use cases, it has been needed to perform coding in some sense. But ofc. I think joule will help a lot here.

Incentivized

Sometimes the support takes a little while, but in the end they always have good answers and the people who answer you are very prepared even for questions outside of GeneXus.

Incentivized

There are, for example, great blog writings about automation cases and examples. The studio version is updated often. There are also useful OpenSAP online courses.

Incentivized

GeneXus not only allows you to focus on the business and develop quickly and precisely with an AI solution, but it also has a team of highly qualified resources, dedicated to permanent evolution and innovation, which provides a great, committed and efficient service.

Compared to Mendix, we decided not to go for low code application building and in the other parts of Build, Build is stronger and better integrated with SAP. On the hand of Coding, using Build Code, gives us Joule, which understands SAP better and also have a tighter and more secure coupling with SAP services.

Incentivized

• All our projects and satisfied clients have been thanks to the work of GeneXus. The company is mainly dedicated to this technology which supports most of the operations.

• SAP Build significantly reduces the effort on the integration side compared to other LCNC platforms.
• From a licensing perspective, the platform can kind of lock you in, but that's also true for other cloud platforms as well.
• Creating an app that fully works with your ERP (especially if you have S4HANA as the ERP System) is fast. It enables quick prototyping.

Incentivized