Google Assistant vs. Joule

1. For quick timing and scheduling calls - As I can just say, ok google, I want to have a call with {teammate's name} today, can you find a. time of 30mins for me sometime this week?
2. Can you answer on the design pattern which Netflix uses for next video

Incentivized

For Development using Joule is improving very well. Lot of improvement is still needed. Joule is only available in BTP right now but we are looking forward to use Joule in our RISE environment. Businss AI with Joule is also improving. More and more apps are supported. But to make best use, we need more supported apps and custom app support.

Incentivized

• To-do lists and task boards so I can work on it better, and can ask quickly on what I need to do.
• Saves time and increases efficiency - I can ask and can answer relevant answers
• Set-up meetings - quickly scheduling and checking for time which suits all people

Incentivized

• Find connections based on what seems like subjective input
• Find relevant data within 1 trillion data points quickly
• Give clear answers that can be understood by anyone

Incentivized

• I think newer, complementary ideas are a bit sharper than Google Assistant especially in a Q&A environment or when seeking some depth to a subject. That enhancement is to be expected I feel. And Google Assistant is not so self limiting so I don't have a lot of improvement needs because I use this for what I've become accustomed to and for the ability overall.
• It is always important to do your best around hectic places, in bad tower signal areas or even if trying to do something new while using Google Assistant. Have patience in the setting. It pays off.

Incentivized

• Speed in which answers are given in our particular use case
• More learnings on jargon and staying relevant in a constantly changing space
• We'd love this same tool to do more games

Incentivized

I feel this can be adjusted and after some trial and error you sort of start knowing what will work and how. And I have to say the overall impact becomes personal and we are all different. I'm small scale and as I've said, it works.

Incentivized

Joule has excellent potential and SAP right step towards AI solution. All the great offerings from Joule are very useful. We are waiting for the Joule to support more AI functionality, provide support to custom developments, help in the customer specific scenarios. Availability on our environment is very important for us.

Incentivized

This is where I would go next. And I think in functionality Google Gemini has a place. Especially so in this Newer AI driven world. I don't have any full force desire or usage on Google Gemini at the present. It is mostly what has been passed on to me in indirect ways.

Incentivized

Joule is better because it doesn't take only data available on the web, but combines that with data provided directly by the game publisher through API to us which includes every single match played = all data points from all of those matches. That means that for us Joule gives deeper insights than any online AI chat agent could do

Incentivized

• I'm about strategy and clarity in my projects and flexibility to change, enhance and correct. I get what I need in this via Google Assistant.
• When I need to get the word out or have a little extra done in real time I can easily use the feature via my voice commands while I'm doing something else simultaneously even in an environment where background noise and atmospheric clutter might be present. Clarity is pretty solid in my experience.
• I like to use as little as possible when it comes to Bluetooth, smart enhancements and such and having Google Assistant interact with my connected items is rather smooth as well.

Incentivized

• ROI
• Understanding insights
• Easier to get stuff done

Incentivized