Google Content Experiments (discontinued) vs. GTmetrix

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Google Content Experiments was a tool that can be used to create A/B test from within Google Analytics. It has been discontinued since 2019, and Google now recommends using its Google Optimize service for A/B testing.N/A
GTmetrix
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Gtmetrix is an analytics tool focused on determining website performance with features like page load speed details, video capture, and the ability to test from multiple regions around the world.
$10.67
per month
Pricing
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)GTmetrix
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Solo
$10.67
per month
Starter
$21.25
per month
Growth
$42.50
per month
Basic
Free
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)GTmetrix
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)GTmetrix
Considered Both Products
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Chose Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Google Content Experiments is a free tool and the leading tool in the industry. It's pretty simple to set up a test and use content experiments to monitor objectives once Google Analytics is installed. Less experienced team members can run tests with some training. There are …
Chose Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
It frankly was down to cost. Other platforms offer better targeting etc., however, we found that unless we could demonstrate early value - we didn't get budget sign off. Our teams aren't usually large enough to justify the cost and time to invest in a more complex platform - so …
Chose Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Google Website Optimizer was a better product but has been discontinued. We have also used Test and Target , which has more features but we have been doing fine with Google Content Experiments. Most testing situations can be handled with Google Content Experiments.
Chose Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Google Content Experiment cannot compete with Adobe Test and Target, Quadratics or even Optimizley. It is harder to use with no editing interface, so pages must be actually developed. It doesn't allow for any advanced segmenting or multivarient testing. But it is free, so …
Chose Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
I have not used any alternatives. I only use Content Experiments because it is in GA.
Chose Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Google CE is free, Optimizely isn't plus only until recently I found out that Optimizely can work with multiple goals, however, this was found by meeting their employees at a trade show and not via their website.
Chose Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
We'd use content experiments as a complimentary testing tool alongside more comprehensive testing packages out there. As a free testing tool it does the job for basic A/B testing.
Chose Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
If you are looking for a more advanced great value for money solution I would recommend investigating Visual Website Optimizer. For a more powerful enterprise level solution with the option to have a fully managed service I would recommend Maxymiser.
Chose Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Google Content Experiments provides significantly more insight, historical data and analysis than Unbounce. However, if you do need a solution that offers a WYSIWYG editor, landing page hosting, and limited reporting and testing, Unbounce is a good all-in-one solution and that …
Chose Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
GCE isn't better or worse than any of these, it's just different. When I have the time to build a new page, setup the testing scripts, and go - then I'll use GCE. If I'm doing multivariate I use VWO. If I'm testing a quick button or headline change, I use Optimizely or UnBounce.
Chose Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Google CE does a great job streamlining tools and features. Optimizely does not offer nearly the same amount of tools or resources that G CE does. I would use CE in the future but stay away from Optimizely. Google also has a lot more resources for accruing knowledge on it …
GTmetrix
Chose GTmetrix
Given we are doing the work to improve in Google to a large degree - the Google product is essential. But GTMetrix may use their info as well as other independent stuff to be a little better. I appreciate the way GTMetrix provides the info - cleaner and clearer and thus quicker …
Chose GTmetrix
Compared to the products I have listed PageSpeed Insights is probably the closest to what GTMetrix does and many times those 2 tabs are open side by side. SEMrush is a full SEO platform and though it can do much of what GTmetrix does it is also quite expensive and does a lot …
Chose GTmetrix
The data visualization aspect of GTmetrix is better than the competition. It uses letters A, B, and C to help rate speed and performance. It shows the time, size of the page, and uses colors as well. Green is fast, orange and red are slow (poor).
There are also articles …
Chose GTmetrix
GTmetrix gathers data from both Google PageSpeed and YSlow at same time, so we're using it more often than Google's alternative.
On the other hand, Google PageSpeed offers neat features like download optimized images, scripts and CSS (which GTmetrix don't), so it could be a …
Features
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)GTmetrix
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
9.2
Ratings
12% above category average
GTmetrix
9.4
Ratings
14% above category average
a/b experiment testing9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Split URL testing10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Multivariate testing10.00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Mobile app testing8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Test significance9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Advanced code editor9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Page surveys8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Visitor recordings8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Preview mode8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Test duration calculator10.00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Experiment scheduler10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Client-side tests10.00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Server-side tests10.00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
10.0
Ratings
16% above category average
GTmetrix
10.0
Ratings
16% above category average
Standard visitor segmentation10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Website personalization10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
9.9
Ratings
16% above category average
GTmetrix
10.0
Ratings
17% above category average
Click analytics10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Form fill analysis10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Conversion tracking10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Goal tracking10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Test reporting9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Results segmentation10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
CSV export10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Heatmap tool00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Scroll maps00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)GTmetrix
Small Businesses
Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences
Score 9.9 out of 10
Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)GTmetrix
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
4.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)GTmetrix
Likelihood to Recommend
Google Content Experiments is suited for large and small organizations, no matter your organizational goals. It is not recommended for organizations that are only interested in qualitative data, as there are other tools for receiving specific user experience feedback. It is also not recommended that you implement tests without some sort of goal in mind.
Read full review
GTmetrix is very well suited for small organizations or startups that do not have sufficient technical staff for site optimization. GTmetrix also comes with the free version, which allows users to use their service for free for up to three websites, which is a good option. However, this might not be the best option for a large organization that works in different technical domains and have a good number of technical staff.
Read full review
Pros
  • When you need to measure against event-based goals
  • If you need to see how the test variations performed against secondary goals
  • Given that the the platform requires you actually code a new page with a unique URL, this tool can be good for radical redesigns.
  • Great insights into other information about your testing groups, like whether or not they're mobile, screen size, browser, or really any dimension available in GA.
Read full review
  • Really complete report of performance issues.
  • Get reports from PageSpeed and YSlow at same time.
  • Gives a score from each separate tool, also displays loading time, page size and total requests very easily.
Read full review
Cons
  • You can only optimise for one goal, so if you have several conversions, like phone call and email you need to do it manually.
  • It seems not to work that well for pages with lower amounts of traffic - not great for new or niche sites.
Read full review
  • They might consider improving their checking process speed, it often takes a huge time to display the performance report. This is even longer for non-logged-in users.
  • Previously two different options of Google's Pagespeeds and Yahoo's lighthouse were shown in the report section, now only combined report is shown. I personally like the two reports from different sources.
  • Non-tech savvy persons might not find it so easy to use.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Content Experiments just makes it is simple and easy to implement A|B tests. We will be evaluating other tools in search of a more robust system for multivariate and cross-page testing, such as Optimizely or Visual Website Optimizer. However, for basic testing, you can't really beat it.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
No answers on this topic
It's easy to use fast, data is easy to read and take aways are great too.
Read full review
Support Rating
Using the free tool, overall "live support" is limited. However, there are plenty of online resources to get started. If you need handheld support, it is best to upgrade the service or hire a developer through one of Google's partner agencies. There could be more support for understanding what makes a test useful or not.
Read full review
I have never had the need to use GTmetrix support. Therefore, there is really no way for me to give a grade here. However, if you are on a paid plan my guess and it is a guess, is that their support is as good as the tool is. There are a lot more features in the paid plans, reporting. monitoring etc. I could see where support could come into play as these features are added to the account
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Google Website Optimizer was a better product but has been discontinued. We have also used Test and Target , which has more features but we have been doing fine with Google Content Experiments. Most testing situations can be handled with Google Content Experiments.
Read full review
Given we are doing the work to improve in Google to a large degree - the Google product is essential. But GTMetrix may use their info as well as other independent stuff to be a little better. I appreciate the way GTMetrix provides the info - cleaner and clearer and thus quicker to address.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Doing good experiments/Optimize has helped to take out the guesswork of the things we want to implement.
  • We have done fairly complex changes such as changing navigation and managed to see improvements outcomes immediately before we have to request developer.
  • Our teams have become more data centric in how they approach changes.
Read full review
  • A great free tool that is does what it is meant to do very well.
  • Due to its simplicity and speed it is highly efficient.
Read full review
ScreenShots