Google Optimize vs. SiteSpect

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Optimize
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
Google offers the Optimize A/B testing tool for testing website content and versions.N/A
SiteSpect
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Key features include: - A/B, split, and multivariate testing campaign management - Targeting and personalization - Front-end usability testing - Back-end testing using Origin Experiments - Site acceleration with SiteSpect AMPS(R) - Mobile site and native app supportN/A
Pricing
Google OptimizeSiteSpect
Editions & Modules
Google Optimize
Free
SiteSpect Enterprise
$0
SiteSpect Cloud
$0
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google OptimizeSiteSpect
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google OptimizeSiteSpect
Considered Both Products
Google Optimize
Chose Google Optimize
We switched from Google Optimize to ab tasty which is a paid platform. Ab tasty provides much better capabilities and support, although this is with a cost implication which Google Optimize didn’t have. Google Optimize was useful as an introductory platform prior to getting a …
Chose Google Optimize
Google Optimize 360 is expensive but definitely more accurate and reliable than the other simple tools out there.
Chose Google Optimize
Adobe Target is extremely powerful and provides features Google Optimize does not, but Adobe Target is also more expensive and harder to use. Google Optimize could benefit by offering basic built-in reporting so it doesn't require Google Analytics events.
Chose Google Optimize
We didn't use Optimizely very long as it fell out of budget due to complexity with the experiment setup.
Chose Google Optimize
Google Optimize is a great entry-level test platform and is an ideal solution for my clients that want something simple to start with and see value. Although not as robust as the paid platforms, it still does the job well and delivers believable data ties to one of the most …
Chose Google Optimize
Google Optimize being part of the Google stack makes it great in reporting and analysis. Wish Google would add more features like dynamic tests, multi funnel tests, conversion calculator based on the total number of traffic of the page being tested instead of using the websites …
Chose Google Optimize
Other products probably are more in-depth, but also cost more money and require technical resources to install.
Chose Google Optimize
To be very honest, we haven't used any software different from Optimize at this point. It would be irresponsible to write about alternatives that we don't know much about.
SiteSpect
Chose SiteSpect
We haven't seen any platform deliver the flicker-free performance of SiteSpect. While most platforms have improved their business user facing tools since we originally selected SiteSpect, we've never had any doubt about it's advanced capabilities. Any test we can imagine can be …
Chose SiteSpect
Most of these other tools do not really have a direct comparison. Optimizely and Visual Website Optimizer (VWO) are both A/B testing tools that are similar in nature to SiteSpect. Both Optimizely and VWO are good tools and have their place, but they are not as flexible or as …
Chose SiteSpect
I've also used Adobe's Test & Target tool at another company. It has a nice user interface, but SiteSpect is easier to scale and maintain because the architecture eliminates the need to tag (put mboxes) on the pages on your site. We also did some research on Optimizely, but …
Chose SiteSpect
SiteSpect is a whole different ball game when it comes to these other tools. SiteSpect is about creating a testing culture within your business for continual website improvements. These tests can be conducted without any developer intervention by our clients. Once SiteSpect is …
Chose SiteSpect
I have used all the tools in the market. Sitespect kicks them into the curb based on how easy it is to build variations, and hot it doesnt interfere with client load.
Features
Google OptimizeSiteSpect
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Google Optimize
4.9
Ratings
50% below category average
SiteSpect
-
Ratings
a/b experiment testing4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Split URL testing2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multivariate testing4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app testing2.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Test significance1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced code editor2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Page surveys5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Visitor recordings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Preview mode3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Test duration calculator9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Client-side tests7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Server-side tests2.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Google Optimize
7.0
Ratings
20% below category average
SiteSpect
-
Ratings
Standard visitor segmentation6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Website personalization7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Google Optimize
8.2
Ratings
2% below category average
SiteSpect
-
Ratings
Heatmap tool2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Click analytics9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scroll maps9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Form fill analysis8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Conversion tracking9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Goal tracking8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Test reporting7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Results segmentation10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
CSV export9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Google OptimizeSiteSpect
Small Businesses
Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences
Score 9.9 out of 10
Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google OptimizeSiteSpect
Likelihood to Recommend
5.0
(0 ratings)
6.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.7
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google OptimizeSiteSpect
Likelihood to Recommend
Google Optimize is well suited for testing small changes on the browser pages. You have the option of changing designs, texts, and some small features on the page. The audience can be divided using a long list of factors, so it makes it quite easy to set up the test. It is not well suited for complicated feature tests where you need to monitor the user over a long period or where the user is likely to use multiple sessions across multiple devices or browsers
Read full review
SiteSpect is kind of the difference between the space shuttle and a bicycle. They will both get you places. However Sitespect is considerably more complex and more configurable than most other options that I have seen and used (Optimizely, Visual Website Optimizer, etc.). But those other solutions also have a much lower learning curve and [users] are able to do a lot of things with relatively no coding experience or skill, where SiteSpect really does need capable developers to be utilized well.
Read full review
Pros
  • Easy test implementation. You're up and running once you've pinned down your hypothesis.
  • Goals and conversion points can be easily mapped to any test.
  • Customization of goals in case you don't have one setup.
  • Integrated with Google Analytics so you can correlate with other metrics under behavior and e-commerce data.
Read full review
  • You can quickly run test campaigns of content and promotions – without burdening valuable IT resources, and without the need for JavaScript tags, code changes, or JavaScript that slow your ability to test, and decrease your site’s speed.
Read full review
Cons
  • Track site performance with each test version; see if the resource timing of each test has anything to do with conversion rates.
Read full review
  • One current limitation of Sitespect is that the data it captures is numeric. For example, it will not capture a department name variable such as supplements. The workaround is that a user can create a supplement department value capture that fires as 0 or 1. For companies with very large numbers of departments the workaround can be a time consuming process.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
I'm no longer at the company where I used SiteSpect, but based on my 18+ months as the manager responsible for the use of SiteSpect, I'd definitely recommend continuing with the product. I've since recommended it to one other company. SiteSpect has been a great business partner - the level of customer support that I got was outstanding over the time that I used the product.
Read full review
Usability
Google has always been known to make easy-to-use products. The Google Optimize interface is intuitive and easy to follow for anyone.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Google has well-documented resources and unlimited use cases that can be found online. Plus, their support is always helpful and available.
Read full review
When we have any questions on how the tool can be utilized for some unique requirements, they always make excellent suggestions.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Just need to have your requirements ready such as, what you are expecting from the tool, is there anything specific you want regarding reporting, tracking etc.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We switched from Google Optimize to AB Tasty which is a paid platform. AB Tasty provides much better capabilities and support, although this is with a cost implication which Google Optimize didn’t have. Google Optimize was useful as an introductory platform prior to getting a full programme running but this has now sunset so is no longer available.
Read full review
We haven't seen any platform deliver the flicker-free performance of SiteSpect. While most platforms have improved their business user facing tools since we originally selected SiteSpect, we've never had any doubt about it's advanced capabilities. Any test we can imagine can be run through SiteSpect, and they have provided the support we required when we didn't have the expertise in-house to realize our vision. At this stage, I feel that SiteSpect's user interface lags behind the competition, but it's feature set can't be argued with.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Useful with clients on a budget who need to see ROI without another paid platform to install.
  • Setting up Google Optimize helps as an additional value add when bidding on projects.
  • Nothing negative unless a larger client needs a more robust package; then, there is always Google Optimize 360 as well as platforms from other vendors.
Read full review
  • Our clients see large revenue increases
  • Insight and better customer service
  • Budgetary spending analysis. E.g Do we really need lifestyle photography? etc.
Read full review
ScreenShots