Google offers the Optimize A/B testing tool for testing website content and versions.
N/A
SiteSpect
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Key features include:
- A/B, split, and multivariate testing campaign management
- Targeting and personalization
- Front-end usability testing
- Back-end testing using Origin Experiments
- Site acceleration with SiteSpect AMPS(R)
- Mobile site and native app support
N/A
Pricing
Google Optimize
SiteSpect
Editions & Modules
Google Optimize
Free
SiteSpect Enterprise
$0
SiteSpect Cloud
$0
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Optimize
SiteSpect
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Required
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google Optimize
SiteSpect
Considered Both Products
Google Optimize
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Google Optimize
We switched from Google Optimize to ab tasty which is a paid platform. Ab tasty provides much better capabilities and support, although this is with a cost implication which Google Optimize didn’t have. Google Optimize was useful as an introductory platform prior to getting a …
Adobe Target is extremely powerful and provides features Google Optimize does not, but Adobe Target is also more expensive and harder to use. Google Optimize could benefit by offering basic built-in reporting so it doesn't require Google Analytics events.
Google Optimize is a great entry-level test platform and is an ideal solution for my clients that want something simple to start with and see value. Although not as robust as the paid platforms, it still does the job well and delivers believable data ties to one of the most …
Google Optimize being part of the Google stack makes it great in reporting and analysis. Wish Google would add more features like dynamic tests, multi funnel tests, conversion calculator based on the total number of traffic of the page being tested instead of using the websites …
To be very honest, we haven't used any software different from Optimize at this point. It would be irresponsible to write about alternatives that we don't know much about.
We haven't seen any platform deliver the flicker-free performance of SiteSpect. While most platforms have improved their business user facing tools since we originally selected SiteSpect, we've never had any doubt about it's advanced capabilities. Any test we can imagine can be …
Most of these other tools do not really have a direct comparison. Optimizely and Visual Website Optimizer (VWO) are both A/B testing tools that are similar in nature to SiteSpect. Both Optimizely and VWO are good tools and have their place, but they are not as flexible or as …
I've also used Adobe's Test & Target tool at another company. It has a nice user interface, but SiteSpect is easier to scale and maintain because the architecture eliminates the need to tag (put mboxes) on the pages on your site. We also did some research on Optimizely, but …
SiteSpect is a whole different ball game when it comes to these other tools. SiteSpect is about creating a testing culture within your business for continual website improvements. These tests can be conducted without any developer intervention by our clients. Once SiteSpect is …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose SiteSpect
I have used all the tools in the market. Sitespect kicks them into the curb based on how easy it is to build variations, and hot it doesnt interfere with client load.
Features
Google Optimize
SiteSpect
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Google Optimize
4.9
Ratings
50% below category average
SiteSpect
-
Ratings
a/b experiment testing
4.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Split URL testing
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multivariate testing
4.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing
1.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing
6.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app testing
2.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test significance
1.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced code editor
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Page surveys
5.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visitor recordings
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Preview mode
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test duration calculator
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval
8.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation
6.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Client-side tests
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Server-side tests
2.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Google Optimize
7.0
Ratings
20% below category average
SiteSpect
-
Ratings
Standard visitor segmentation
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Website personalization
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Google Optimize is well suited for testing small changes on the browser pages. You have the option of changing designs, texts, and some small features on the page. The audience can be divided using a long list of factors, so it makes it quite easy to set up the test. It is not well suited for complicated feature tests where you need to monitor the user over a long period or where the user is likely to use multiple sessions across multiple devices or browsers
SiteSpect is kind of the difference between the space shuttle and a bicycle. They will both get you places. However Sitespect is considerably more complex and more configurable than most other options that I have seen and used (Optimizely, Visual Website Optimizer, etc.). But those other solutions also have a much lower learning curve and [users] are able to do a lot of things with relatively no coding experience or skill, where SiteSpect really does need capable developers to be utilized well.
You can quickly run test campaigns of content and promotions – without burdening valuable IT resources, and without the need for JavaScript tags, code changes, or JavaScript that slow your ability to test, and decrease your site’s speed.
One current limitation of Sitespect is that the data it captures is numeric. For example, it will not capture a department name variable such as supplements. The workaround is that a user can create a supplement department value capture that fires as 0 or 1. For companies with very large numbers of departments the workaround can be a time consuming process.
I'm no longer at the company where I used SiteSpect, but based on my 18+ months as the manager responsible for the use of SiteSpect, I'd definitely recommend continuing with the product. I've since recommended it to one other company. SiteSpect has been a great business partner - the level of customer support that I got was outstanding over the time that I used the product.
Just need to have your requirements ready such as, what you are expecting from the tool, is there anything specific you want regarding reporting, tracking etc.
We switched from Google Optimize to AB Tasty which is a paid platform. AB Tasty provides much better capabilities and support, although this is with a cost implication which Google Optimize didn’t have. Google Optimize was useful as an introductory platform prior to getting a full programme running but this has now sunset so is no longer available.
We haven't seen any platform deliver the flicker-free performance of SiteSpect. While most platforms have improved their business user facing tools since we originally selected SiteSpect, we've never had any doubt about it's advanced capabilities. Any test we can imagine can be run through SiteSpect, and they have provided the support we required when we didn't have the expertise in-house to realize our vision. At this stage, I feel that SiteSpect's user interface lags behind the competition, but it's feature set can't be argued with.
Useful with clients on a budget who need to see ROI without another paid platform to install.
Setting up Google Optimize helps as an additional value add when bidding on projects.
Nothing negative unless a larger client needs a more robust package; then, there is always Google Optimize 360 as well as platforms from other vendors.