Google Optimize vs. Statsig

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Optimize
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
Google offers the Optimize A/B testing tool for testing website content and versions.N/A
Statsig
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Statsig is a feature management with feature flags, pulse, holdouts, from the company of the same name in Bellevue.N/A
Pricing
Google OptimizeStatsig
Editions & Modules
Google Optimize
Free
Enterprise
Custom
annual pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google OptimizeStatsig
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google OptimizeStatsig
Considered Both Products
Google Optimize
Chose Google Optimize
We switched from Google Optimize to ab tasty which is a paid platform. Ab tasty provides much better capabilities and support, although this is with a cost implication which Google Optimize didn’t have. Google Optimize was useful as an introductory platform prior to getting a …
Chose Google Optimize
Google Optimize 360 is expensive but definitely more accurate and reliable than the other simple tools out there.
Chose Google Optimize
Adobe Target is extremely powerful and provides features Google Optimize does not, but Adobe Target is also more expensive and harder to use. Google Optimize could benefit by offering basic built-in reporting so it doesn't require Google Analytics events.
Chose Google Optimize
We didn't use Optimizely very long as it fell out of budget due to complexity with the experiment setup.
Chose Google Optimize
Google Optimize is a great entry-level test platform and is an ideal solution for my clients that want something simple to start with and see value. Although not as robust as the paid platforms, it still does the job well and delivers believable data ties to one of the most …
Chose Google Optimize
Google Optimize being part of the Google stack makes it great in reporting and analysis. Wish Google would add more features like dynamic tests, multi funnel tests, conversion calculator based on the total number of traffic of the page being tested instead of using the websites …
Chose Google Optimize
Other products probably are more in-depth, but also cost more money and require technical resources to install.
Chose Google Optimize
To be very honest, we haven't used any software different from Optimize at this point. It would be irresponsible to write about alternatives that we don't know much about.
Statsig
Chose Statsig
Statsig is easier to use and has more tools for analysis, though we were working with the open source version of Flagsmith, merely to handle feature flags, and using Heap and homegrown tools for manual analysis, so the Cloud version may be different
Features
Google OptimizeStatsig
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Google Optimize
4.9
Ratings
50% below category average
Statsig
-
Ratings
a/b experiment testing4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Split URL testing2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multivariate testing4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app testing2.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Test significance1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced code editor2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Page surveys5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Visitor recordings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Preview mode3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Test duration calculator9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Client-side tests7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Server-side tests2.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Google Optimize
7.0
Ratings
20% below category average
Statsig
-
Ratings
Standard visitor segmentation6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Website personalization7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Google Optimize
8.2
Ratings
2% below category average
Statsig
-
Ratings
Heatmap tool2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Click analytics9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scroll maps9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Form fill analysis8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Conversion tracking9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Goal tracking8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Test reporting7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Results segmentation10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
CSV export9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Google OptimizeStatsig
Small Businesses
Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences
Score 9.9 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google OptimizeStatsig
Likelihood to Recommend
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google OptimizeStatsig
Likelihood to Recommend
Google Optimize is well suited for testing small changes on the browser pages. You have the option of changing designs, texts, and some small features on the page. The audience can be divided using a long list of factors, so it makes it quite easy to set up the test. It is not well suited for complicated feature tests where you need to monitor the user over a long period or where the user is likely to use multiple sessions across multiple devices or browsers
Read full review
Statsig is well suited for running straightforward a/b tests on frontend deployments. We've actually used it to log events on our backend and used the HTTP API to integrate with tools like Hubspot to evaluate email campaigns
Read full review
Pros
  • Easy test implementation. You're up and running once you've pinned down your hypothesis.
  • Goals and conversion points can be easily mapped to any test.
  • Customization of goals in case you don't have one setup.
  • Integrated with Google Analytics so you can correlate with other metrics under behavior and e-commerce data.
Read full review
  • Clear experimentation insights and details
  • Experimentation health and performance ratings
  • Statistical analysis of in flight work
Read full review
Cons
  • Track site performance with each test version; see if the resource timing of each test has anything to do with conversion rates.
Read full review
  • Complex data science focussed UI
Read full review
Usability
Google has always been known to make easy-to-use products. The Google Optimize interface is intuitive and easy to follow for anyone.
Read full review
For the most part it is pretty easy to use. - There are some quirks with the javascript SDK (getExperiment().getValue?). - The Events vs. Metrics design pattern is complex, and creating new Metrics from Events can be frustrating if you are trying to use event metadata - It's really frustrating not to be able to link Static IDs (before a user signs up) to User IDs, in order to follow users all the way through onboarding, or to log events that occur for signed in users when you are exposing the experiment to users before they've signed up
Read full review
Support Rating
Google has well-documented resources and unlimited use cases that can be found online. Plus, their support is always helpful and available.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We switched from Google Optimize to AB Tasty which is a paid platform. AB Tasty provides much better capabilities and support, although this is with a cost implication which Google Optimize didn’t have. Google Optimize was useful as an introductory platform prior to getting a full programme running but this has now sunset so is no longer available.
Read full review
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Useful with clients on a budget who need to see ROI without another paid platform to install.
  • Setting up Google Optimize helps as an additional value add when bidding on projects.
  • Nothing negative unless a larger client needs a more robust package; then, there is always Google Optimize 360 as well as platforms from other vendors.
Read full review
  • We uncovered several feature releases that were causing a negative impact on our product activation rate by running exclusion experiments
Read full review
ScreenShots