GoTo Meeting vs. Microsoft Teams

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
GoTo Meeting
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
From GoTo (formerly LogMeIn), GoToMeeting is an online meeting, desktop sharing, and video conferencing software that enables users to connect via the internet. It hosts a suite of online meeting tools, including real-time screen sharing and integrated audio.
$12
Per Organizer / Per Month for 150 Participants [billed annually]
Microsoft Teams
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.
$4.80
per month per user
Pricing
GoTo MeetingMicrosoft Teams
Editions & Modules
Professional
$12.00
Per Organizer / Per Month for 150 Participants [billed annually]
Business
$16.00
Per Organizer / Per Month for 250 Participants [billed annually]
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
3,000 Participants
Microsoft Teams Essentials
$4.80
per month per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month (paid yearly) per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Basic
$7.20
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Standard
$15
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GoTo MeetingMicrosoft Teams
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPricing available by monthly or annual subscription, with discounts for annual commitments.Discounts are available for non profit organizations.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
GoTo MeetingMicrosoft Teams
Considered Both Products
GoTo Meeting
Chose GoTo Meeting
Many times, it seems like GoTo Meeting requires less bandwidth to run. We noticed with a few test machines that if you have over twenty video streams, this product could handle the load better than if we used Microsoft Teams and had many video streams.
Chose GoTo Meeting
Our CIO made the decision - all the products work well. He travels a lot and preferred the GoTo Meeting mobile app over the other applications' mobile capability. The cost basis was similar to both Zoom and Microsoft Teams. Our users had familiarity with GoTo Meeting which …
Chose GoTo Meeting
I think the audio and video conections seems to be more stable with larger meetings in GoTo Meeting over Microsoft Teams and Google Meet. Navigation and controlls seem to be a great deal easier to use for most of our attendies over the other 2 platforms. But I think GoTo …
Chose GoTo Meeting
It is easy to use and works well for small meetings. Zoom has more features, but GoTo Meeting is simpler and cheaper. We chose it because it’s a good fit for our needs.
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meeting is a simpler product and easier to use than teams however it is lacking is some of the features that teams has mainly integration with the rest for the office 365 suite.
Chose GoTo Meeting
Very basic and will require you to likely user other software. I think this is why people prefer to use teams because they can do so much in one place. It is way more than just conferencing.
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meeting is more cross-platform compatible as compared to most of the other alternatives, the interface is more User friendly as compared to most of the other alternatives, it is more affordable as compared to most of the other alternatives, the process of accessing it is …
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meetings has no time limit for sessions with more than x attendees. GoTo Meetings provides an easy way to allow attendees to share their screens. GoTo Meeting does not require membership/license/registration attendees; they are not required to download the desktop …
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meeting is good for small organizations. For my personal use I prefer Google Meet but for professional use I like to use GoTo Meeting. It gives a good quality video and audio which is something that make you compare the product with other similar products. The free …
Chose GoTo Meeting
I also love that GoTo Meeting has a mobile app for working on the go. If your WiFi isn't working well, you can also dial in to listen to the meeting. Additionally, if you are not able to join at all, there is a recording feature to ensure you are not missing out.
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meeting's privacy, security, and hacking protection are much better than Zoom. Aside from that, Zoom also gave us too many technical issues using it and we didn't feel comfortable hosting important meetings or conducting interviews while worrying that some random person …
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meeting is better than Zoom in terms of price and time/steps needed to join calls/meetings. In terms of brand value and awareness, many users and customers still prefer Zoom and Google Meet to GoTo Meeting. For GoTo to scale up and have more pie-share they need to position …
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo is a one-point connection that allows you to do everything in one place, such as meetings, connecting, and chats. It has many other great features that make it easy to use. GoTo meeting is the best way to connect professionally with the people you want to communicate with.
Chose GoTo Meeting
Flexible and easy to setup and use.
Chose GoTo Meeting
We do not allow Teams to connect externally from our network. Due to this restriction, GoTo Meeting has helped tremendously to facilitate meetings with external stakeholders.
Chose GoTo Meeting
I prefer Google and Microsoft.
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meeting has a straightforward, user-friendly interface designed primarily for hosting and attending meetings. It is easy to schedule and join meetings, with a focus on simplicity. MS Teams has a more complex interface due to its wide range of features we felt were not …
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meeting beats these tools because it has many more features.

The interface looks a lot better and cleaner and there’s less lag during meetings. It makes meetings in the workplace a lot more enjoyable
Chose GoTo Meeting
If I will compare GoTo Meeting with them then the first thing comes to my mind is it's easy to use UI. You clicked the link and it redirected you to meeting fast that you will never see any queue to join meeting. Chat option there to note down points and ask questions to host. …
Chose GoTo Meeting
From a standard meeting perspective GoTo Meeting is on par with all of these offerings. From a classroom perspective Zoom offers the most comprehensive set of tools for the educator. Tools like switching the chat from private to public at the presenter's level is excellent to …
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meeting has lower costs for regular usage for employees where they can't afford to take full package annually
Chose GoTo Meeting
In my opinion, it is not as efficient, and we are much more used to using the Teams commands over the GoTo commands and actions. The learning curve was quick, and I do not know if transcribe is an option in GoTo like in Teams, which makes sharing calls very helpful.
Chose GoTo Meeting
As I have used same multiple platforms, to my expeience and understanding it's much more reliable. It works on low bandwidth. It's quality of audio and video confercing is highly remarkable which allows us to build a strong relationship with the client. Also it beacuse of this …
Microsoft Teams
Chose Microsoft Teams
Teams definitely has the upper hand over zoom and GoToMeeting. The fact that it is bundled with M365 is a huge plus not only from a cost perspective but it gives you deep integration with the other office products. This allows seamless file sharing with sharepoint and OneDrive, …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Like I mentioned previously, I like MS Teams a lot. I think GoToMeeting has some strong positives, and I use it more for international calls (especially because many professionals have familiarity with GTM); however, I have seen the quality of MS Teams exceed what I personally …
Chose Microsoft Teams
We chose primarily because of the promised integration with the Microsoft Business Suite - which it mostly delivers on. That does give Teams an obvious advantage over competitors. IMHO Teams has a richer, more mature feature set, and the experience is more reliable and stable. …
Chose Microsoft Teams
The Teamwork was introduced to the company earlier. Sr. Management pulled training sessions through marketing and digital advertising department. Most of the company's projects were posted on the Teamwork. It is the company's project management space. If Microsoft Teams …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Although competitors such as Slack and Webex can really stand up to MS Teams, our organization chose Teams as the predominant work communicator. Working within this decision, we are overall happy with the feature set that Teams provides. In my opinion, the advantages of its …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams is faster and very responsive when compared with those tools. Also it is robust and does not crash. It is compatible with most of the OS and platforms. Backward compatibility is amazing. It is an enterprise tool. So can be efficiently used for both client …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams edges above the conferencing competition by allowing file collaboration and ongoing group chats with coworkers. We selected Microsoft Teams for all our video & audio conference calls for it's ability to integrate with our Outlook client and make it easy for …
Chose Microsoft Teams
When working remotely, it's ideal for team communication. The text messaging and chat features are simple and intuitive. You can quickly and easily join a video or audio conference with other team members. It's just fantastic; it's a must-have tool for business, especially in …
Chose Microsoft Teams
We actually never asked to purchase Microsoft Teams. We got it within our Office/Microsoft 365 subscriptions. We were using Skype 4B within Department and when Teams was announced, within a week or two we tried to use Teams on Department level.
Within first 6 months people …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Better Microsoft integration, same quality of video, better chat, better sharepoint, worse screen sharing, worse resource management (battery).
Chose Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams is much better than Skype as it does the core collaboration part much better: call quality, screens-hare, group call, etc. Microsoft Teams includes many tools that Skype doesn't have: knowledge base, task tracking, file sharing, etc. Finally, channels takes the …
Chose Microsoft Teams
I think Microsoft Teams stacks up with these and is superior in the amount of features offered.
Chose Microsoft Teams
Sometimes the connection could be something really frustrating, the other end can't hear you, and you have to re-enter the meeting so the problem with the audio can be fixed. Although the audio codecs have been greatly improved since the product was known as Lync, personally I
Chose Microsoft Teams
We used a very old version of Lifesize. Microsoft Teams is more modern, so this is not really a fair comparison. Teams does the same and so much more! Again, being part of the Office 365 E3 offering meant we had it available anyway.
Chose Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams is better overall when used in a workstation to get things done collectively. You can share your screen with a simple call, @mention someone to notify them of things, insert your files or drive. It can do every thing these other applications are doing. What you …
Chose Microsoft Teams
For an app that is integrated with the Microsoft Office 365 suite, it's nice to have. That said, there are many alternatives out there with the same or more robust options if you aren't tied to packaging everything together.
Chose Microsoft Teams
Teams does a much better job of having all tools readily available. It allows use across other platforms and communication with those outside of my organization as well.
Features
GoTo MeetingMicrosoft Teams
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Product A and Product B
GoTo Meeting
8.1
Ratings
2% above category average
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
High quality audio8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
High quality video8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Low bandwidth requirements7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile support8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Comparison of Screen Sharing features of Product A and Product B
GoTo Meeting
8.2
Ratings
3% above category average
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Desktop sharing8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Whiteboards8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Product A and Product B
GoTo Meeting
8.1
Ratings
2% below category average
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Calendar integration8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Meeting initiation8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with social media7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Record meetings / events8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Slideshows8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
GoTo Meeting
8.3
Ratings
2% above category average
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Live chat8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Audience polling8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Q&A8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Product A and Product B
GoTo Meeting
8.1
Ratings
0% below category average
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
User authentication8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Participant roles & permissions8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Confidential attendee list8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
GoTo Meeting
-
Ratings
Microsoft Teams
7.0
Ratings
10% below category average
Task Management00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Search00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Visual planning tools00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
GoTo Meeting
-
Ratings
Microsoft Teams
7.8
Ratings
2% below category average
Chat00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Notifications00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Discussions00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Surveys00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts00 Ratings5.70 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
GoTo Meeting
-
Ratings
Microsoft Teams
7.6
Ratings
4% below category average
Versioning00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Video files00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Audio files00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Document collaboration00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Access control00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Advanced security features00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive00 Ratings5.30 Ratings
Device sync00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Best Alternatives
GoTo MeetingMicrosoft Teams
Small Businesses
Intermedia AnyMeeting Pro
Intermedia AnyMeeting Pro
Score 7.1 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
JioMeet
JioMeet
Score 10.0 out of 10
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Webex Meetings
Webex Meetings
Score 8.4 out of 10
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
GoTo MeetingMicrosoft Teams
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.5
(0 ratings)
3.7
(0 ratings)
Usability
5.0
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.6
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Online Training
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.9
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
4.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
3.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
4.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
GoTo MeetingMicrosoft Teams
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft Teams has always given us issues if we run an extensive meeting with more than 30 participants. Often, HR would train many people at once, and call quality would degrade or crash. This provides a good alternative when Teams is not working correctly, but we must continue orientation or training. It is inappropriate for all meetings since we are embedded in the Microsoft ecosystem, and Teams integrates well with SharePoint.
Read full review
Microsoft Teams is ideal for organizations where employees regularly collaborate by sharing files, working on the same documents, updating the progress, etc. This is because different file formats are supported for online editing and collaboration with the help of Microsoft Teams. Additionally, for every file which is shared among the team members, emails are not sent again and again which helps in easily managing and organizing files. It is less appropriate where the team members have to instantly reply to an urgent task as sometimes the notifications are not sent properly which may lead to a delay in the work.
Read full review
Pros
  • Calendar Scheduling: It prepares us for all meetings, automatically sends reminders, and ensures we never miss a meeting.
  • Ease of Scheduling: Scheduling a meeting is straightforward and saves us a lot of time.
  • The screen-sharing feature allows us to present documents and plans effortlessly during client calls.
  • We use the recording feature extensively for training purposes, especially for the onboarding of new members.
Read full review
  • Video calls are great with Microsoft Teams. They've made big improvements over the last year and I rarely have issue with getting on. It's nice when things just work.
  • The most used functionality is, of course, the chat feature. It does what it's supposed to do and you can create chat groups from whoever you'd like. We use it a lot when there is a special project and a team from various groups get together for a short period of time to get things done.
  • An overlooked function is the ability to search anything within Microsoft Teams. Any photo, document, or chat can be searched and found pretty easily. I can't tell you how many times this has saved me from having to rewrite something or start over.
Read full review
Cons
  • Lack of security updates (Not sure if they are taking care of but they should make users aware of it frequently)
  • Brand recognition improvement (Specifically in the US market where many customers still prefer Zoom)
  • Many prospects still consider GoTo as a legacy platform compared to Meet, Teams, Zoom. This is not a missing feature but GoTo team should really position themselves as innovative rather than pre-existing perceived notion of being legacy.
Read full review
  • I sometimes have a hard time viewing both the meeting screen and chat window at the same time.
  • There have been times when someone in a meeting will totally lose their connection.
  • At times the sound quality is not what it should be which makes it hard to hear each other.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We used other software like goto meetings but found it best because of its user friendly interface and easy interfacing. It helped us in COVID and now we can say we are depending on it and love it. We recommend it to our friends company and they are also using it. It is very affordable and easy to integrate with system
Read full review
Microsoft Teams is included with our Office 365 subscription and we have no intention of migrating off of Office 365 and Microsoft products. Since Microsoft Teams is included for free with our Office 365 subscription, and since we enjoy all the features, benefits, and functionality, there is no question that our team will continue to use the product
Read full review
Usability
The simplicity of GoToMeetings desktop, mobile, and web-based applications make it a very robust and user-friendly meeting solution. At times, it may be more complex than needed, but it is nice to have so many features that can be used if needed. Once installed, it is very easy to use and navigate.
Read full review
The overall functionality of the product is incredible in that it provides a one-stop solution for organization and communication. The product is also very well integrated into Microsoft Outlook and other Office apps. Visually pleasing and very easy to use interface. New features are constantly being added to enhance the user experience.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
This application has always been available. Never an issue
Read full review
Rare, but outages do happen
Read full review
Performance
This application is fast. Loads fast, no stall
Read full review
Sometimes about once a week I get a message that says "Sorry, there seems to be something wrong". But it goes away in a few minutes.
Read full review
Support Rating
When we have issues, they seem to respond quickly and do everything they can to help us. They have even tried to find other ways we could get more use out of their product, or improve the way we are currently using it. Overall, their support has been fairly good for us.
Read full review
I think Microsoft Team is overall good application for communication, track Project work inter the teams and also intra teams. I have 7 out of 10 because it needs improvements in certain features like video sharing call, call drop, audio quality and connecting problems even after having good internet connection.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
It was very easy and self-explanatory.
Read full review
I find everything I need for my day-to-day work.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
GoTo Meetings has no time limit for sessions with more than x attendees. GoTo Meetings provides an easy way to allow attendees to share their screens. GoTo Meeting does not require membership/license/registration attendees; they are not required to download the desktop application. They can attend from the web if they choose to do so.
Read full review
We chose primarily because of the promised integration with the Microsoft Business Suite - which it mostly delivers on. That does give Teams an obvious advantage over competitors. IMHO Teams has a richer, more mature feature set, and the experience is more reliable and stable. Although like any of there there is room for imporvement.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
It does not appear to have a limit to how many teams and employees we can have using it
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It has improved the efficiency of our sales meetings, allowing us to close deals faster and with greater clarity.
  • There has been a 15% increase in our sales conversion rates.
  • The ability to effectively conduct in-house training has improved team productivity and reduced costs associated with in-person training.
Read full review
  • User experience has been much better than the previous Skype for Business app. It has an easy-to-use interface with persistent chats. The search feature is very fast and useful.
  • MS Teams has mostly focused on Collaboration and team building features which are very useful for organisational communications. This in turn has a positive impact on the overall business outcome.
  • Scheduling meetings have never been so easy in the past. We can schedule meetings on the go without any hassles
  • Since Teams is accessible from multiple platforms like Laptop, Desktop, Mobile phones, etc it has been very convenient from a Mobility perspective.
Read full review
ScreenShots

GoTo Meeting Screenshots

Screenshot of GoTo App - Create Meeting (Out of Session)Screenshot of GoTo App - Join Meeting (Out of Session)Screenshot of GoTo App - Meeting (In Session)Screenshot of GoTo App - Mobile Meetings (Out of Session)Screenshot of GoTo App - Screen Share Meeting (In Session)