GQueues vs. Jira Work Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
GQueues
Score 1.0 out of 10
N/A
GQQueues is a project management solution with features such as task management, calendar management, and smart filtering.
$3
per month per user
Jira Work Management
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Jira Core is Atlassian's general purpose business and project management tool available to smaller companies or teams and designed to suit a variety of purposes (e.g. marketing planning, product roadmap, etc.). In Jira Core, Workflows define process and enable teams to track tasks. Jira Core Cloud instances also have boards that let users visualize workflows and drag and drop tasks from to-do to done. It is available on the cloud.
$0
Pricing
GQueuesJira Work Management
Editions & Modules
GQueues for YOU
$3
per month per user
GQueues for BUSINESS
$4
per month per user
Free
$0
Starter - Monthly
$7.53
per month per user
Premium - Monthly
$13.53
per month per user
Starter - Annually
$22,500
per year User tier: 201-300
Premium - Annually
$40,500
per year User tier: 201-300
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GQueuesJira Work Management
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsNo credit card required. Plans billed annually.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
GQueuesJira Work Management
Considered Both Products
GQueues
Chose GQueues
Does not have ability to number the lists.
Chose GQueues
It was easier for me to set up & assign, just worked better for what I was looking for.
Chose GQueues
We have tried some other task management tools such as Producteev. This one is very intuitive and just does what you need it to do and does it well.
Chose GQueues
Our small leadership team tried to use Wrike for a while but I moved back to GQueues after a 3 month trial period. I found the lack of keyboard shortcuts in Wrike made it cumbersome to use.

I like the simplicity and use of color in GQueues.
Jira Work Management
Chose Jira Work Management
Personally I would not choose Jira Work Management for a marketing team. However, the marketing team was enveloped into the Jira Work Management instance due to use by more technical teams.
Chose Jira Work Management
Whereas all competing products are great and you may do more or less the same type of tasks, Atlassian has the edge when it comes to cross-team collaboration, in particular in scenarios where escalations must also involve developers or the product teams. All in all, all are …
Chose Jira Work Management
Tight integration with other tools meant that Jira Work Management was the best choice for our organisation.
Chose Jira Work Management
My colleague shared it with me as I often collaborate across multiple teams - it stacks up super well as each of those similar products are managed by separate departments. Having another Jira tool under the same roof is extremely beneficial for me, as opposed to having to …
Chose Jira Work Management
Monday.com was our first attempt at using project management software, but we couldn't get the hang of it and nobody updated tasks. Management got even more confused with it so we switched to Basecamp. Basecamp is very simple and easy for small companies just getting into their …
Chose Jira Work Management
Expert on software and applications development.
Chose Jira Work Management
Trello and Jira Work Management are similar in concept, but the only real benefit of Trello is that is free and, if you already have an instance of Jira, Jira Work Management is worth the price because it's a plugin for your already configured product.
Chose Jira Work Management
Trello is great for simplicity and visual task tracking, but Jira Work Management surpasses it in scalability and customization; for complex workflow, Jira beats Trello. Asana has a good UI, but integration Jira has better options.
Chose Jira Work Management
In a certain way, they are related in how to organize the information, however, working our information with Jira Work Management to have a roadmap makes it more professional, accessible, and easy to manage for any member of the team and/or interested person. For example, in …
Chose Jira Work Management
The user experience of Jira is better than Trello, Trello doesn't offer a Sprint board. And we have followed the Sprint mode of working in the Project management space, therefore preferring Jira. Trello is a more general-use Project Management tool, whereas we were looking for …
Chose Jira Work Management
The evolution of Jira Service Desk to Jira work management is accompanied by lot of new features like the List View which allows inline editing, easy column management, the Calendar View bases on extensible modal and state categories, the Timeline View supports tasks and …
Chose Jira Work Management
While Zoho was very helpful with the reporting and data it provided, Jira was capable of adapting our proyect planning and organization based on the framework known as SCRUM. This was the key selling point for us and why we opted to work JIRA over Zoho Analytics. Both are very …
Chose Jira Work Management
I found better features than Zoho Projects and Zoho Sprints. Airtable required a lot of effort in configuring so won't recommend that. Monday.com was easy but has fewer controls and familiarity among the developers when we work with external agencies.
Chose Jira Work Management
My main comparison would be towards Phabricator. Phabricator is a useful tool for task and software management, however, it is hard to use, even for people with an engineering background. For people without an engineering background it was totally not user-friendly. The …
Chose Jira Work Management
It was the preferred tool for our engineers and product team so it was an easy decision to make.
Chose Jira Work Management
Jira provides multiple functionalities which any project needs during implementation. It has the feature of tagging the right owner to the issues. It has made the life of project managers easier to track the resolutions and efforts which was utilised for completing the task. It …
Chose Jira Work Management
Jira is quite intuitive to use. It has a bit of a learning curve, but that solely depends on how your organization has set it up in the first place. That could be really simple or a bit more complicated depending on how the admin has defined the workflow, accesses, etc. That …
Chose Jira Work Management
It is easier to use and with more added functionality and issue tracking details so we can: segregate and link multiple issues, create product roadmaps, do sprint plannings with their dates, issue backlog with bug fixes, improvements, and product enhancements, and have new …
Chose Jira Work Management
Trello, Asana and Pipefy
Chose Jira Work Management
Jira is the gold standard if your company can afford it. I have used other programs at other companies that do not have the same collaboration features and do not do as well. This seems to be the best for aligning and for offline use across the board really, can’t beat it.
Chose Jira Work Management
Tried to use Salesforce for ticketing management... But salesforce was more suited in project management & work flow management. Salesforce is very good for the above mentioned points but when we tried for the ticket management system it was not giving the desired results & …
Chose Jira Work Management
Jira provides better reporting and task management than Teamwork. Teamwork was better from a managerial perspective to get updates from team members on a task, but the tracking and planning were not as robust. Overall, Jira was more robust and offered better granularity, but …
Chose Jira Work Management
Jira Work Management is superior in terms of managing and monitoring tasks and projects. It has a more complete interface, although it's a little more complex and not as user-friendly.
Features
GQueuesJira Work Management
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
GQueues
-
Ratings
Jira Work Management
8.6
Ratings
12% above category average
Task Management00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Team Collaboration00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Document Management00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Email integration00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
GQueues
-
Ratings
Jira Work Management
9.0
Ratings
18% above category average
Quotes/estimates00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Invoicing00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Project & financial reporting00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
GQueuesJira Work Management
Small Businesses
7shifts
7shifts
Score 9.9 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Whimsical
Whimsical
Score 8.5 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Whimsical
Whimsical
Score 8.5 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
GQueuesJira Work Management
Likelihood to Recommend
1.0
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
GQueuesJira Work Management
Likelihood to Recommend
I have recommended it and I will continue to do so. I think it is great for our industry and it is very affordable.
Read full review
Jira Work Management suits projects involving multiple teams, such as product development. In our case, the design, development, and QA teams use Jira to track tasks from ideation to deployment. Custom workflows and real-time updates ensure that all teams are on the same page, and the ability to link related tasks helps manage dependencies effectively.
Read full review
Pros
  • Real time task management
  • Notifications to employees for new tasks and back to managers when complete
  • Linking to Google calendars
Read full review
  • Provide a roadmap of all epics
  • Provide a backlog in which you can see all the possible work to be done to create your sprint plan
  • Have all our projects within reach
  • Have a dashboard with editable columns to manage your work
  • Be able to filter by person
  • Be able to see past sprints
Read full review
Cons
  • Sharing with a non-Gqueues user can be frustrating
  • Archiving an entire queue for resurrection later if for an annual event
  • Occasionally hiccups when syncing between mobile app and pc
Read full review
  • More clarification on where to find useful tools and resources for new users.
  • Breakdown of Projects, Tasks, Sub-tasks, bugs is hard to follow and cannot be changed once created.
  • The ability to customize the dashboard/home page to fit the needs of individuals could use some work.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
As we are Atlassian users overall, this entire ecosystem is truly built from a 360 perspective. It becomes the one source of truth, and we can easily see where we are in our projects and where to emphasize focus in the upcoming period. There are some areas for minor improvements, but they are more a matter of preference rather than business necessity
Read full review
Support Rating
They are very responsive via email.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Our small leadership team tried to use Wrike for a while but I moved back to GQueues after a 3 month trial period. I found the lack of keyboard shortcuts in Wrike made it cumbersome to use. I like the simplicity and use of color in GQueues.
Read full review
Personally I would not choose Jira Work Management for a marketing team. However, the marketing team was enveloped into the Jira Work Management instance due to use by more technical teams.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Good value. I've been able to set it up to do what I need to do at a much lower cost than some of the more sophisticated tools available.
Read full review
  • The impact has been positive to have a roadmap available of all the work and to be more aware of the time, effort, and people that will be involved, in order to make a better decision about how our investment will look based on our benefits.
Read full review
ScreenShots

GQueues Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of