Grammarly in San Francisco provides its grammar improvement and AI driven writing assistance platform, available on free or paid premium and business plans.
$30
per month per member
Microsoft 365 Copilot
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
For enterprises, Microsoft 365 Copilot (or just Microsoft Copilot) is a generative AI operating as an intelligent virtual assistant for work. Through a chat interface, business users can use it to solve a variety of complex tasks.
$31.50
per month per user
Pricing
Grammarly
Microsoft 365 Copilot
Editions & Modules
Pro
$30
per month per member
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Microsoft Copilot
$31.50
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Grammarly
Microsoft 365 Copilot
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Discount available on Pro plan for annual pricing.
Pricing shown is based on an annual commitment. Discount available for annual payment.
I haven't used other tools, but the simplicity and instant usability of Grammarly alone is what makes it so that I don't even need to look for another similar tool.
Compared to the ProWritingAid, Grammarly helps me with ease of use, real-time suggestions, tone, and clarity suggestions, and integration with other platforms provides cost v/s features above all.
While DeepSeek (or similar tools) is effective for specific use cases like sentence rephrasing or creative localization, Grammarly offers a more comprehensive and versatile solution for businesses. Its advanced features, integrations, and focus on professionalism make it the …
Once installed, Grammarly's proofreading abilities across all platforms (email, text, WordPress, etc.) are easy and intuitive. I don't even know if these other AI tools have that ability.
I believe that both Grammarly and ProWritingAid are excellent tools that complement each other well. It would be fantastic to see an integration that combines the strengths of both. ProWritingAid provides comprehensive reports that are incredibly helpful. These reports …
I found that ProWritingAid is harder to use than Grammarly and that some of its tips are too technical.
QuillBot was helpful for rewording sentences, but it didn’t check grammar as well as Grammarly does. It’s also not as strong when editing an entire document. In my opinion, …
Grammarly makes it seamless to check your writing. Performance wise, they are about the same. But to use ChatGPT for checking writing, it required you to manually put the text in. It also doesn't allow you to automatically make the changes. It only makes suggestions which you …
To be honest, I have used both and they are very similar. QuillBot has some nice features in their free plan, such as a sidebar rewrite tool, but Grammarly is cheaper. Grammarly has the same tool, but it is just easier to access and use within QuillBot. Overall, the price was …
Grammarly has a much more natural tone to suggestions. Often, when trying to rewrite an email or a letter/document with other products, it's hard to match those tones and still keep your document sounding authentic and with human empathy. Also, having the ability to make …
The only program I know of that is similar is the onboard Apple spell-check, which will often miss several things that Grammarly does not. I also use Google Docs, which is not nearly as helpful as Grammarly since you can use it anywhere. Docs also misses things that Grammarly …
Apple AI has a Grammarly-like product, we tried using it, but it's not overlaid on top, and you need to select the text and then wait for the recommendation. It's possible Apple AI may improve but I cannot imagine it ever directly competing with Grammarly.
Grammarly is easy to use and I like its suggestions. Other AI tools are better for generating text, but Grammarly is better at optimizing it and catching grammar mistakes. I also like that it has the extension which makes it easy to use Grammarly anywhere without having to sign …
It isn't listed but LanguageTool is very good and I prefer it for the fact you can use it in any platform I have found so far including agency analytics. Therefore, it is easier for me to suggest this as a toolbar add on to the team. It isn't currently listed on TrustRadius …
It's not a stack-up per se, but I use it side by side, which is very helpful. ChatGPT helps me by suggesting procedures, letters, and more. This is my go-to app for work.
Nothing comes close to Grammarly in terms of ease of use and quick setup. It practically works right out of the box without any rigorous configuration. It also allows you to pick a specific dialect which isn't available in other apps. And since Grammarly introduced AI features, …
The useability of Grammarly and the ability to get live feedback is much better than other programmes.
Other programmes prioritise AI to do the bulk of the writing. I like to do the bulk of the writing and let AI make suggestions; not the other way around.
We went with Grammarly over other online alternatives because of Grammarly's simple and easy to understand user interface. We feel like it was well equipped to deliver us the content and suggestions we needed without all of the extra fluff. It saves us time and isn't …
We needed a tool where secure data was not submitted to servers to process as we have some health care related data to keep private. We also needed to be able to test this tool without committing first to see if it is a fit and Microsoft provided this easily to us.
I love Bing Copilot because it is integrated to Bing, I can have the answers easily using my phone or my laptop. The answers show the links just in case one needs to have further information about a topic, and somehow the tool feels friendlier than the other tools such as …
All data remains within the company, in the tenant. Customer data must never be leaked to an unprotected environment, not even targeted customer issues. That's why Copilot is much better suited for this.Copilot is also a Microsoft product, and its integration with all other …
I think It lost the race for now. I don't think Microsoft will keep investing on it since we have better tools outside their environment. In my opinion, Microsoft Copilot is not even in the benchmark tools and in the race for AGI. I think Microsoft is way behind and Microsoft …
they work beautifully in their own ecosystems. since my organization mostly uses Microsoft products, Microsoft Copilot is user to navigate compared to gemini
Microsoft Copilot is a serious competitor to ChatGPT in the corporate world, due to its heavy and well implemented integration across the Microsoft 365 suite. It produces comparable results, but provides data security, controls, customisation and options that ChatGPT can't …
Copilot is dominates ChatGPT in business related capabilities, like the listed below: - Email content recommendation making it more professional and in business language - Copilot creates more accurate and better looking custom images per my instructions
Since we use Microsoft 365 apps in our day-to-day work, we didn't have to choose Copilot over any other AI. It just came with the subscription. However, I would still use it over ChatGPT because Copilot is integrated with all the major Microsoft apps that we use. We dont need …
I find that ChatGPT offers better image quality than Copilot, and creating custom GPTs in ChatGPT feels more intuitive than generating agents in Copilot Studio. However, Copilot provides more reliable sources for research compared to ChatGPT, which sometimes returns …
Grammarly is a great tool that would work well for writers, business professionals, students, and more. The app is incredibly useful in helping to improve writing and offers tons of tools like idea generation, outline drafting, using a specific voice to reach your audience and checking for plagiarism, to name a few.
In my experience, if you're using within the Microsoft office suite, it has the best integration. The usability is great and the user has to put little effort to get a task done. On the other hand, in my experience, coding within Visual Code is unreliable and the results are not consistent. You can't use with different programming languages and ask for complex tasks. Pitty because I think the VS integration is great.
Integration with existing tools - Grammarly works in practically all text areas across your browser, including email and things like Google Docs, etc.
Quality control - the meat of Grammarly is checking your text and writing in real-time, directly as you type. Most of the time, Grammarly provides very accurate recommendations and quality checks on your text.
Analytics and reporting - Grammarly sends regular updates via email about your usage statistics and other detailed info. This type of reporting can be very helpful in tracking your progress over time.
Like all other AI systems, Copilot suffers from hallucinations. You have to be very careful with the output it generates. It could be completely wrong. It needs to be checked and rechecked to see if it is correct.
Copilot sometimes struggles to formulate accurate responses to complex queries. It will either provide an incomplete response or generate a response that would be completely wrong.
Right now, I am unable to customize Copilot for my specific needs. Hopefully, in future versions of the AI, this will be taken care of.
Either I'm as dumb as a bag of nails, or Grammarly has been an invaluable tool in our communication arsenal since we've been users since 2017. I don't recall which podcast we heard it on, but it may have been when Jordan Harbinger was on Art of Charm. I listen to about 8 podcasts a day, so it was probably on something I listened to, demo'd it, and then ponied up for a paid subscription.
It was very easy. I have it applied to all of my browsers as an extension so that I know I have entirely accurate grammar in anything I write for my company. I appreciate having something that will always be applied to anything on my computer. I wish I didn't need to use the Grammarly keyboard on mobile; I want it to read my text boxes like my computer does.
It's integrated well across the Microsoft 365 suite of applications, without getting in the way, and providing useful tools. Some of the integrations need development, e.g. the Outlook add on is quite basic, and the excel and powerpoint ones can't do much yet. The implementation in Teams is really fantastic, significantly improving the experience of recording, transcription, and summarising meetings and action points.
I have not really used customer support. I used the FAQ page to see how to re-install Grammarly because it wasn't functioning properly in longer documents. It seems to be working better now, but it still does not always underline all of the issues in the actual text. Thus, it is sometimes difficult to know where the errors are located.
Perhaps if you have a team that is not overly computer savvy, which in that case, I'd challenge your hiring decision, there's not much involved. I'm sure there are YouTube videos that go in-depth about implementation but it's really quite simple.
While DeepSeek (or similar tools) is effective for specific use cases like sentence rephrasing or creative localization, Grammarly offers a more comprehensive and versatile solution for businesses. Its advanced features, integrations, and focus on professionalism make it the preferred choice for organizations seeking to improve communication quality and consistency across teams.
We needed a tool where secure data was not submitted to servers to process as we have some health care related data to keep private. We also needed to be able to test this tool without committing first to see if it is a fit and Microsoft provided this easily to us.
It's allowing us to communicate more effectively and more confidently.
Presenting our staff and agents to the customers in the best way possible, and helps shine us up and everyone will know we pay attention to detail.
Our objective is to help our customers and be the bridge that connects the customers with the engineers and technical teams in the software vendors side, and having a like Grammarly is a game changer because it knows all the correct marketing and technical terms.
Service desk employees resolve some tickets much faster thanks to Copilot support. This percentage, according to current knowledge, is between 20% and 30%.
For administrators, creating scripts and automations with Copilot support saves them a significant amount of time. This currently stands at between 20% and 40%.
If you don't give the copilot proper instructions, you'll also get answers that aren't valuable. You do need some knowledge or training to get the right answers from the copilot.