TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Greenhouse vs. iCIMS Talent Cloud

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Greenhouse

360 Reviews and Ratings

iCIMS Talent Cloud

385 Reviews and Ratings

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Greenhouse

    Score8.9 out of 10
    		N/AGreenhouse delivers a solution to help companies hire for what's next. Their hiring platform has users at companies like DoorDash, Dropbox and Wayfair, who use Greenhouse's intelligent guidance to design and automate all aspects of hiring.N/A

    iCIMS

    Score6.4 out of 10
    		N/AiCIMS is a web-based applicant tracking system (ATS). The tool's talent recruiting and management functions include features like social recruiting, talent sourcing, offer management, and onboarding. The programs are centralized on iCIMS’s UNIFi platform and are scaled for mid-sized to enterprise businesses.

    $1,700

    per month

    Pricing
    GreenhouseiCIMS
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    GreenhouseiCIMS
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    GreenhouseiCIMS
    Considered Both Products
    Greenhouse Software Inc.
    Verified User
    Chose Greenhouse
    Interms of price point Greenhouse is placed very well. The pricing is reasonable and affordable compared to its competitors. iCIMS is a lot bigger ATS with higher pricing and lot of features. I would rate Greenhouse higher on ease of usage and pricing
    Incentivized
    Verified User
    Chose Greenhouse
    Greenhouse is less matrixed than iCIMS but way more user-friendly and easier to track where a candidate is in the process. Greenhouse is more advanced and has a lot more capability than Workable. Workable is also user-friendly but does not have the same reporting capability or …
    Incentivized
    Verified User
    Chose Greenhouse
    iCIMS has good reporting, but is very basic compared to Greenhouse.
    Incentivized
    Christina Wells
    Director of People Operations in Human Resources at Modernize (Internet, 51-200 employees)
    Chose Greenhouse
    iCIMS is VERY clunky compared to Greenhouse. I have heard good things about Lever. We demo'd with Lever and Jazz when we were selecting a new ATS and went with Greenhouse. I have heard Greenhouse is more expensive than others and some companies get priced out. When I recommend …
    Incentivized
    Christine Alling
    Senior Clinical Recruiter, Platinum Level, Contract in Human Resources at UnitedHealth Group (Human Resources, 201-500 employees)
    Chose Greenhouse
    Greenhouse and JobDiva are similar - they're both easy to use and don't require a huge time commitment for the applicant. iCIMS is also easy for the candidate to apply. ADP requires a significant time commitment from the applicant, but, it has integration features that the …
    Incentivized
    Andy Lutz
    Technical Recruiter in Human Resources at Segment.com (Internet, 51-200 employees)
    Chose Greenhouse
    Comparable with Lever, and better than iCIMS
    Incentivized
    Verified User
    Chose Greenhouse
    Greenhouse is far better than the alternatives I have used in the past. It is sleeker, quicker, and has better functionality. With ADP it was very old and boring, but functional. iCIMS was good but lacked a lot of features and you had to pay for each of them. Taleo was older as …
    Incentivized
    Verified User
    Chose Greenhouse
    Greenhouse has mastered the ATS tool and continuously improves features based on soliciting feedback from their customers. They do a great job at listening and adjusting based on the growing needs of their customers in the talent management space.
    Incentivized
    Tim Caudill
    Web Developer in Information Technology at Fischer Homes (Real Estate, 501-1000 employees)
    Chose Greenhouse
    Greenhouse was slightly more expensive, but the recruiting team really liked the ability to capture a resume via phone/tablet while at recruiting events, integration into LinkedIn and other job boards (Glassdoor, Indeed, etc), ability to add notes and set reminders for …
    Incentivized
    Daniel Dowd
    Manager at Thrive Capital (Venture Capital & Private Equity, 11-50 employees)
    Chose Greenhouse
    I've used iCims and Salesforce Job Science and Greenhouse is better. Lowest barrier to entry. Better pricing.
    Incentivized
    iCIMS
    Verified User
    Chose iCIMS
    iCIMs is better in terms of reporting and tracking data. They also have great built-in reports that you can use to track progress. However, Greenhouse excels in every other way: better user experience, integrates with calendar invites for interviews, tracks feedback for every …
    Incentivized
    Hiba Rashid
    Recruiter in Human Resources at Good Shepherd Services (Non-profit Organization Management, 1001-5000 employees)
    Chose iCIMS
    I didn't make the call, but I have used both. I like iCIMS better.
    Incentivized
    Ivonne Mondragon
    Senior Talent Acquisition Partner | Employer Branding in Professional Services at Service Experts Heating & Air Conditioning (Consumer Services, 1001-5000 employees)
    Chose iCIMS
    iCIMS Talent Cloud is easy to navigate when it comes to candidate and reporting search.
    Incentivized
    Verified User
    Chose iCIMS
    iCIMS proved to be a more robust/mature tool that increased recruiter efficiency. Reporting was a big winner, the speed of pulling data and sharing it with peers, scheduling exports, etc.
    Incentivized
    Verified User
    Chose iCIMS
    Better technology. Reasonably priced. Great customer service. Continually updates to keep current. Strong partnerships with other vendors. Great add-on services.
    Incentivized
    Verified User
    Chose iCIMS
    iCIMS was the best bang for our buck!
    Incentivized
    Verified User
    Chose iCIMS
    We recently went through an RFP process and iCIMS was a finalist with Avature and Jobvite. iCIMS finished third in that RFP because of their high cost, challenging customer service, difficult reporting and their ability to work with us on customization of our site.
    Incentivized
    Verified User
    Chose iCIMS
    The iCIMS software is comparable to other larger ATS's out there today. We felt that iCIMS was there to meet the needs of our business. The price point was appropriate for us and the level of customer service support was enticing for us.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    GreenhouseiCIMS
    Recruiting / ATS
    Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Greenhouse and iCIMS Talent Cloud
    Feature
    Greenhouse
    8.7
    139 Ratings
    iCIMS Talent Cloud
    8.4
    126 Ratings
    Job Requisition Management9.6123 Ratings8.8123 Ratings
    Company Website Posting9.6123 Ratings9.6117 Ratings
    Publish to Social Media7.3109 Ratings7.5103 Ratings
    Job Search Site Posting7.4115 Ratings9.4108 Ratings
    Customized Application Form7.5116 Ratings7.2111 Ratings
    Resume Management9.8129 Ratings9.2120 Ratings
    Duplicate Candidate Prevention8.0110 Ratings5.2114 Ratings
    Candidate Search8.0112 Ratings9.4121 Ratings
    Applicant Tracking9.4133 Ratings9.6122 Ratings
    Collaboration9.0126 Ratings9.7110 Ratings
    Task Creation and Delegation9.1104 Ratings7.193 Ratings
    Email Templates9.5112 Ratings8.8122 Ratings
    User Permissions9.0115 Ratings9.3120 Ratings
    Notifications and Alerts9.5128 Ratings7.5108 Ratings
    Reporting7.5111 Ratings7.3121 Ratings
    User Ratings
    GreenhouseiCIMS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.5
    (142 ratings)
    8.1
    (147 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    7.8
    (31 ratings)
    Usability
    9.1
    (60 ratings)
    8.8
    (68 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (5 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (16 ratings)
    6.0
    (103 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.9
    (3 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    6.1
    (2 ratings)
    6.3
    (5 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.8
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)