| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Gusto | Score8.9 out of 10 | N/A | Gusto offers payroll, benefits and compliance capabilities. Gusto is scaled for small to mid-sized businesses, and emphasizes an easy to use interface. | $49 per month |
 Paylocity | Score8.2 out of 10 | N/A | Paylocity provides 24/7 access to your online payroll and human resource data management. Paylocity offers highly customizable payroll functionality, as well as HR, benefits administration, and time and talent management programs. | N/A |
| Gusto | Paylocity | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Gusto offers three pricing plans for payroll, benefits, and HR. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Gusto | Paylocity | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Gusto Paylocity was fairly easy to use like Gusto but could not accommodate the number of employees we have. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Gusto Gusto is much easier to navigate, find what you are looking for, and much more appealing to the eyes. Once you know Paylocity it is fine but Gusto has a lower learning curve. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Gusto More streamlined, less busy of a dashboard. Could log hours proactively. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Gusto For timekeeping, Gusto doesn't have a good option for overnight shifts (it automatically stops at midnight). Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Gusto Gusto looks much nicer and is easier to navigate. It also has way more functionalities than others. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Gusto Comparable prices are overall with other payroll service companies. I can't do all the complicated payrolls like a few others, but overall good to work with 90% of our clients. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Gusto Gusto generally wins on price compared to its competitors. Some organizations nickel-and-dime on billing with headcount, states filed, etc. while Gusto's bills are very easy to calculate and understand. Competitors generally will handle state registrations that Gusto won't do, … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info | Chose Paylocity Excellent. Userface in Gusto and bamboo more intuitive but MUCH better system and service assistance than ADP or Paychex. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Paylocity Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Paylocity Paylocity does well for a medium size business Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Paylocity Paylocity was much cheaper and appeared to have a much more streamlined approach compared to these other systems. I actually was not at the organization during the Paylocity decision making process, but our major concern was cost and ease of use and Paylocity has not … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Paylocity Our company has 501-1000 employees. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Paylocity We went with Paylocity because of the level of service they provided for a company of our size. Being mid-market, there aren't many options, but I feel confident with our decision for us and our employees moving forward as we continue to grow internally and within different … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Paylocity Paylocity is generally very flexible and scalable. It does require investment (it isn't just flipping a switch). Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Paylocity Its much more in-house for us which I think helps us understand our costs, wages, and fix any problems quicker than waiting for a rep from the company to look at the complaint. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Gusto | Paylocity | |
|---|---|---|
| Highlights |
| |
| Gusto | Paylocity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Human Resource Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Leave and Attendance Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Employee Self Service |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Asset Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HR Reporting |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Onboarding |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Performance and Goals |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Performance Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Succession Planning |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Recruiting / ATS |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gusto | Paylocity | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.2 | 8.4 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | 9.3 |
| Usability | 9.6 | 9.4 |
| Availability | - | 9.9 |
| Performance | - | 9.7 |
| Support Rating | 1.3 | 7.7 |
| In-Person Training | - | 8.3 |
| Online Training | - | 7.8 |
| Implementation Rating | 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Configurability | - | 7.6 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - | 8.6 |
| Ease of integration | - | 8.1 |
| Product Scalability | - | 9.6 |
| Professional Services | - | 9.8 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 8.8 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 9.1 |
