TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

HPE SimpliVity vs. StarWind HyperConverged Appliance (HCA)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    HPE SimpliVity

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AHPE SimpliVity is a hyper-converged infrastructure solution. HPE acquired SimpliVity for its Omnicube line of products in January 2017.N/A

    StarWind HCA

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AThe StarWind HyperConverged Appliance (HCA) is a hyper-converged infrastructure solution designed to reduce application downtime on a reasonable budget.N/A
    Pricing
    HPE SimpliVityStarWind HCA
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    HPE SimpliVityStarWind HCA
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    HPE SimpliVityStarWind HCA
    Considered Both Products
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    No answer on this topic
    StarWind
    Chose StarWind HCA
    In terms of features its not quite were Nutanix is as the market leader, but It stacks up well against HPE SimpliVity and Azure Stack HCI. If you want to go down the Edge route and you are an MS shop then there is potential to still do this with StarWind HyperConverged …
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind HCA
    StarWind HyperConverged Appliance was the only option that offered the performance, reliability, and high availability that we were looking for. It's also the solution that is tailored for small organizations and removes a lot of the complexities and extra components needed to …
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind HCA
    We evaluated both of these systems and obtained quotes for comparison. Unfortunately both were way out of budget. StarWind however was well within budget! I have also used Nutanix, and the complexity of the management and the setup of the nodes is way more difficult to set up …
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind HCA
    StarWind at its core functions as the big hitters in the VSAN world, but comes at a better price. Their ability to provide us with HyperConverged technology without needing flash storage or an expensive storage switch is what drove us to buy StarWind. StarWind was also a better …
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind HCA
    We chose Starwind over Nutanix and Scale because of price and hypervisor. Both Nutanix and Scale use a customer hypervisor and we wanted to use a hypervisor we were already well versed in. Starwind won over Simplivity because of cost and support. During our talks with HP we …
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind HCA
    StarwWinds virtual SAN was the most cost effective and it was pretty easy to get set up. It was the only truly redundant 2 node Hyper-converged cluster solution and it was also the most cost-effective. We tried, tested, researched, and priced 4 other Hyper-converged and …
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind HCA
    In the end, we chose StarWind because it offered us all the benefits of an HCA with a price that was about 10 times lower than the competitors' solutions.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    HPE SimpliVityStarWind HCA
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (8 ratings)
    8.4
    (61 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (4 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.3
    (3 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.7
    (53 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.5
    (2 ratings)
    9.5
    (54 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (2 ratings)