IBM Sterling Configure, Price, Quote vs. PandaDoc

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Sterling Configure, Price, Quote
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
IBM Sterling CPQ transforms and automates configuration, pricing and quoting of complex products and services.N/A
PandaDoc
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
PandaDoc headquartered in San Francisco offers their eponymous electronic signature platform for sales teams, containing sales proposal automation and CPQ (configure, price, quote) features, and integration with CRMs.
$35
per month per seat
Pricing
IBM Sterling Configure, Price, QuotePandaDoc
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Starter
$35
per month per seat
Business
$65
per month per seat
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Sterling Configure, Price, QuotePandaDoc
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsPandaDoc offers a free eSign plan and 3 paid packages for eSigning and document automation. All plans include unlimited documents and eSignatures. Evaluations start with a free 14-day trial. Up to a 46% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Sterling Configure, Price, QuotePandaDoc
Considered Both Products
IBM Sterling Configure, Price, Quote
Chose IBM Sterling Configure, Price, Quote
Apart from Experlogix CPQ failing yo seamlessly integrate with a lot of external applications via API, it also has weak CPQ features and is not popular than IBM CPQ. That’s why we decided to shift from Experlogix few months after I joined AT&T.
Chose IBM Sterling Configure, Price, Quote
Unlike other Sterling, Configure, Price and Quote products such as Vendavo, IBM CPQ has robust features that fit all sorts of organizations from small to enterprise corporations. Also, another disparity is that IBM CPQ is hosted in a secured data center and seldom store PCI …
Chose IBM Sterling Configure, Price, Quote
There are tons of Configure, Price and Quote software, but I have not used a lot of them. However, unlike IBM CPQ, Hubspot Sales Hub isn’t operated in compliance with any ISO standards and secured in a data center making it easy to leak customer sensitive data such as payment …
Chose IBM Sterling Configure, Price, Quote
Unlike other competitive CPQ solutions, IBM CPQ do not store any sensitive personal data like credit card details. Therefore, by using iFrame mechanism, it makes it a trustworthy product.
Chose IBM Sterling Configure, Price, Quote
IBM CPQ being hosted in a secured information center, it ensures that customer data is encrypted to never leak to cyber attackers. Also, unlike QuoteWerks, IBM CPQ has robust configure, price and quote features for all sorts of organizations from medium-sized to enterprise …
Chose IBM Sterling Configure, Price, Quote
IBM CPQ has a robust backend integration feature that makes it possible to connect it with a wide array of external APIs and Applications like Salesforce.com to advance procedures such as order-to-cash and purchase orders.
PandaDoc
Chose PandaDoc
I find it easier to automate and create templates in PandaDoc. Specifically the templates. Also, connecting through API is easier (our IT team says so, I'm not qualified to evaluate that). Pricing is also something important, when we acquired PandaDoc it was cheaper so we were …
Chose PandaDoc
PandaDoc is a less clunky user experience, not only on the signature process and review, but also on the document creation process.
Chose PandaDoc
PandaDoc is equal to DocuSign in every significant way except for its level of adoption; however, the pricing of PandaDoc is so much better that it's clearly the best choice for our firm.
Chose PandaDoc
ease of use and simplicity for the customer experience
Chose PandaDoc
PandaDoc has a simple, integrated eSignature component, which is our primary reason for using it over its competitors.
Chose PandaDoc
We used Dropbox back when it was still HelloSign. At the time, new templates were very hard to create. We had to upload a PDF and then add the fields from there. With PandaDoc, we are able to drag and drop the text, images, logos, and fields we need easily. This has saved our …
Chose PandaDoc
While great, HubSpot Sales Hub creates agreements and collectible payments but is not as UX/UI friendly as PandaDoc.
Chose PandaDoc
PandaDoc and DocuSign are very similar in functionality and design, but I prefer to use PandaDoc's interface. It is so easy to use and I prefer PandaDoc's interface and UI. It feels a little cleaner and a little more professional to me when compared with DocuSign's interface …
Chose PandaDoc
much better. The pricing structures worked a lot better than the other companies because we are a small clinic
Chose PandaDoc
PandaDoc provided similar features and functionality at a better price, but the "tipping point" was integrated e-signatures.
Chose PandaDoc
To be able to block certain fields within templates and contracts, so that the commercial team can negotiate the rest and adapt them but cannot change those purely legal clauses that should not be negotiated or changed without the approval of the legal department. I also find …
Chose PandaDoc
We briefly used Proposify, and it had some nice options for creating more ascetically pleasing proposals and contracts. However, it was far more time-consuming, and any gain in asceticism did not outweigh the significant loss in efficiency, simplicity, and reliability of using …
Chose PandaDoc
There is no comparison. PandaDoc is far superior to any others I've seen. That's why I moved my company over when I saw the were using docusign
Chose PandaDoc
Conga was difficult to build template contracts and not as simple to set up templates, etc., for our sales contracts as Pandadoc has been (simple drag-and-drop in Pandadoc). The automation and integration between our Salesforce and Conga accounts were not working correctly, so …
Chose PandaDoc
We chose PandaDoc for its ease of use and tools that allow a professional feel. The convenience for our clients to review and sign agreements also helped us make the decision to go with PandaDoc.
Chose PandaDoc
We looked at DocuSign before PandaDocs, and while they are a well-known and good product, we felt their basic content was lacking compared to PandaDoc. We felt we got more bang for our buck, and the navigation seemed better. Plus, we get a dedicated rep with PandaDoc.
Chose PandaDoc
All very similar offerings. PandaDoc is one of the few that provided an approval workflow that we required.
Chose PandaDoc
We still use Quickbooks for invoicing but are looking into other products that integrate with PD better than Quickbooks. That way we can quote and invoice from PD.
Chose PandaDoc
I can't say I know enough about the credentials of either to comment.
Features
IBM Sterling Configure, Price, QuotePandaDoc
CPQ
Comparison of CPQ features of Product A and Product B
IBM Sterling Configure, Price, Quote
10.0
Ratings
14% above category average
PandaDoc
-
Ratings
Quote sharing/sending10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Product configuration10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration options10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Pricing rules10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Price adjustment10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Purchase history and open contracts10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Guided selling/Sales portal10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
CPQ reporting & analytics10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
CPQ-CRM integration10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Attachments to quotes10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Order capturing10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Sterling Configure, Price, QuotePandaDoc
Small Businesses
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.4 out of 10
Foxit eSign
Foxit eSign
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.4 out of 10
MSB Docs
MSB Docs
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP Sales Cloud
SAP Sales Cloud
Score 8.3 out of 10
DocuSign
DocuSign
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Sterling Configure, Price, QuotePandaDoc
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.6
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
6.1
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.3
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
2.8
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.7
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
6.7
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Sterling Configure, Price, QuotePandaDoc
Likelihood to Recommend
Were it not for the fact that IBM CPQ lacks mobile and tablet applications, I would have recommended it 100%. However, I still have that 99% recommendation rate since this solution has saved us a lot by allowing us to close more sales within a short period by creating a channel where we collaborate with customers by offering coupons, sending price lists and orders.
Read full review
As an alternative to other electronic signature mechanisms, I can't recommend PandaDoc more highly. It works, plain and simple. It is less costly - by a lot - than most alternatives, stores signed documents online for easy access, is simple to use by both our staff and our clients, and makes our lives far easier.
Read full review
Pros
  • Automating configuration, pricing and quotation of banking services.
  • Via web self-service on IBM CPQ, customers and the sales team are able to streamline sales processes by getting guidance whenever needed.
  • Customers are able to view price lists before making any purchase so as to make informed decisions.
Read full review
  • PandaDoc allows our team to create and send detailed sales proposals and quotes with the use of their templates.
  • The use of collaborative editing is also beneficial because our team is able to have multiple users edit and comment on documents simultaneously.
  • Document tracking is useful because we are able to receive real-time notifications and updates on the proposal process.
Read full review
Cons
  • Disaster recovery and backup databases are hectic to utilize without IT skills due to it’s rich in lots of features.
  • Cost is slightly expensive, but it is worth the results we gain.
Read full review
  • I would like to see the ability to LOCK a field instead of locking an entire block or document.
  • I would like to see more standard features that need to be part of the service instead of add-ons.
  • Would like to see an option to allow different levels of users than just the two standard options.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
We have been using it for a few years now and find it vital to getting our bids out quickly and accurately to our customers. We can get a request for information from a customer and once we have their basic parameters create a professional bid in minutes. It's actually usually harder to find out what the customer wants than to use PandaDoc and create a document with it
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Once you get the hang of it, it's very easy to use. There can be a slightly steep learning curve to get fully in on the system. The new editor v2 has really improved usability and allows us to collaborate on documents simultaneously. Once the templates and library items are set up, a new document, whether it be a sales or HR document, takes very little time to complete.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
We haven't had any real issues regarding downtime as of yet.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
As I mentioned earlier - performance is near perfect as I can create, send, adjust my documents. I love the tracking feature as well as I can tell when my documents have been seen and by whom. The only issue I have run into is with saving and formatting - occasionally the file document does not save with the newly assigned name or the content of the document does not stay formatted nicely.
Read full review
Support Rating
Timely and courteous response time from IBM Support any time there was a request that needed to be made.
Read full review
Recently I could not upload a pdf to a contract - support was very responsive and easy to work with. They got back to me the next day with an apparent fix - however when I opened the document nothing had changed. I then could not respond to the rep who was helping me because it was a "no-reply address", the problem still has not been solved and we had to make alternate arrangements to get this to the client. Never had it happen before and was only with this one contract.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Implementation was before the time I was here at Riafox, however, support has been great in assisting to merge spaces and upgrade to 2.0 Editor.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Apart from Experlogix CPQ failing yo seamlessly integrate with a lot of external applications via API, it also has weak CPQ features and is not popular than IBM CPQ. That’s why we decided to shift from Experlogix few months after I joined AT&T.
Read full review
PandaDoc is a more polished, professional, and 'legitimate' software site than other solutions, since PandaDoc really specializes in creating professional proposals, quotes and invoices. The eSignature capacity and pricing table capacity embedded in the documents as well as fillable fields, pre-made, customizable and reusable templates also make PandaDoc stand out.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
I agree. We have created folders for multiple departments and have been successful with the usage.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • IBM CPQ has enabled us to gain a lot of leads, which turns to be real clients by imposing discounts on our services.
  • Integration with salesforce.com makes it easy to configure products and services by creating quote-to-cash orders.
  • Price lists and coupons makes it easy to customers to place orders.
Read full review
  • We have greatly increased the efficiency in which we can get signatures from individuals for documents and increase productivity.
  • We have been able to find older documents very easily.
  • W-9 have been very difficult due to Section 3, but this was addressed with conditional logic
Read full review
ScreenShots

PandaDoc Screenshots

Screenshot of some of the custom-designed themes, templates, embedded rich media, and interactivity to give every deal the opportunity to get noticed.Screenshot of automatic notifications, on-the-fly editing, CRM Integrations, and integrated eSignatures.Screenshot of reporting, with drill down to the deal level with proposals, to pick which deals to include (or exclude).Screenshot of legally binding eSignaturesScreenshot of centralized communications to streamline the negotiation process, and make revisions in real-time in a single location.Screenshot of document analytics that display what’s really happening after documents are sent with real-time reporting on engagement and activity on the documents. This enables teams to respond faster to prospects.