IBM DataStage vs. Qlik Replicate

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM DataStage
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
IBM® DataStage® is a data integration tool that helps users to design, develop and run jobs that move and transform data. At its core, the DataStage tool supports extract, transform and load (ETL) and extract, load and transform (ELT) patterns. A basic version of the software is available for on-premises deployment, and the cloud-based DataStage for IBM Cloud Pak® for Data offers automated integration capabilities in a hybrid or multicloud environment.N/A
Qlik Replicate
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Qlik Replicate enables organizations to accelerate data real-time replication, ingestion and streaming via change data capture, across a wide range of heterogeneous databases, data warehouses and data lake platforms.N/A
Pricing
IBM DataStageQlik Replicate
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM DataStageQlik Replicate
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM DataStageQlik Replicate
Considered Both Products
IBM DataStage
Chose IBM DataStage
IBM DataStage performes bettere than SSIS in every aspect. IBM DataStage performes better than SAP Data Services in terms of variables and job orchestration flexibility. It is as strong as ODI, but less complex to implement. It allows to write SQL queries as dbt and glue, but I …
Chose IBM DataStage
its very good and i would get best support from ibm if their is any issue.i would upgrade it very easily.ibm red books are very good for learning and getting expertise on the product.we would get frequent updates when their is a patch released.it would be easy to integrate with …
Chose IBM DataStage
With effective capabilities and easy to manipulate the features and easy to produce accurate data analytics and the Cloud services Automation, this IBM platform is more reliable and easy to document management. The features on this platform are equipped with excellent big data …
Chose IBM DataStage
IBM Infosphere DataStage has been in the market for more than a decade now. It is reliable and the user community online is vast and which helps with the resolution identification easily. IBM has done a good job keeping up with guiding connectors and links for new databases …
Chose IBM DataStage
It's obvious since they both are from the same vendors and it makes it easier and can get better rates for licensing. Also, sales rapes are very helpful in case of escalations and critical issues.
Chose IBM DataStage
Currently not using any of the Informatica tools, so, I don't have a real way of comparing the tools. But comparison against Microsoft SSIS (Sql Server Integration Services) I'd say DataStage stacks favorably. DataStage is a powerful tool for ETL processes that integrates …
Chose IBM DataStage
We chose IBM InfoSphere DataStage because it is the tool that has been used, historically, at the company level. In the near future, nothing prevents us from orienting ourselves to new solutions in view of a restructuring of architecture.
Chose IBM DataStage
We have very limited experience of using Informix and should not provide any comments. But datastage works real well for us.
Chose IBM DataStage
Compared to other ETL tools, the connectors really work, and makes the developments less complex because they facilitate the development of the processes. The maintenance of the processes is simple, since it is a very visual tool, and you can count on the technical …
Chose IBM DataStage
DataStage offers better integration capabilities without the need to write code manually. It also has a native ETL engine whereas MSIS requires a SQL Server. It has better integration capabilities with data quality, data profiling and data governance tools. The main drawback of …
Chose IBM DataStage
No, it wasn’t my decision to use such an ETL product. I’m just the administrator at this point. I’ve heard there are other products there that are even on cloud support. That is much easier to use, more agile, and user-friendly. That doesn’t have that barrier from user to …
Qlik Replicate
Chose Qlik Replicate
I found this as my lifesaver in terms of its efficacy and approachable to scale the streaming data from our ecommerce platform and analytics of data made much easier than compared to others. As it's partners with azure and other platforms which made our applications faster to …
Chose Qlik Replicate
Qlik Replicate is fast and easy. ADF can do a wider variety of things
Chose Qlik Replicate
Qlik Replicate was very cost-effective and easy to use.
Chose Qlik Replicate
Qlik gave better perfoamnce
Chose Qlik Replicate
For different data bases source and target support, transformations, scalability, speed
Chose Qlik Replicate
We tried to use Oracle GoldenGate for our Oracle source replication needs but, had too many issues with a number of our tables due to churn or size. Qlik Replicate had no issues. And, we can tune our tasks to not impact the source systems we are pulling from.
Chose Qlik Replicate
Great tool for data replication solution for Oracle/SQLServers/etc. Real easy to get it set up and start realizing business value. Getting the PoC accomplished in a short window. Product costing and easy to start small and scale as needed. It helped cover most of our ask …
Chose Qlik Replicate
Qlik Replicate / Attunity was able to be put on our server behind our firewall where with Fivetran would have required. Fivetran would also have required a different SQL server CDC setup. HVR was just as powerful if not more but was more costly and the user interface was not …
Chose Qlik Replicate
Qlik Replicate was more manageable, very intuitive and easy to understand than the other products like Striim. The learning curve is less with Qlik Replicate and the connectors for various sources was easier to plug and play.
Chose Qlik Replicate
The biggest advantage of Replicate in comparison to Fivetran is that we can run the application on-prem. This allows us to configure it precisely how we desire, avoid opening additional ports in our firewall, and monitor its resource consumption directly. That level of …
Chose Qlik Replicate
We replaced IBM’s Change Data Delivery software (Change Data capture specifically for Netezza) because it had a bad user interface, it was difficult to set up, and it was very hard to troubleshoot errors. We selected Qlik Replicate (then called Attunity CDC) because it has a …
Chose Qlik Replicate
We have not evaluated any other products in the last 3 years.
Chose Qlik Replicate
Attunity: Easy interface, relatively easy monitoring, zos support, budget friendly.
we choose Attunity.
At the same time we use AWS DMS for DB2, sqlserver -> aws services replications (cheaper). However because AWS DMS does not support db2 zos we use Attunity for db2 zos …
Chose Qlik Replicate
Far less complex to manage
Chose Qlik Replicate
Simple to do one-to-one copy and very reliable, as other tools a little complex in setting up the pipelines and scheduling parts. Very simple to connect to the SFTP locations and easy to download them as well.
Chose Qlik Replicate
You need to have expertise knowledge to design and develop data using visual studio. But you can design a data flow with minimum experience. In addition to that QLIK has a better performance. It enables you to replicate a large volume of data with minimum latency. The …
Chose Qlik Replicate
We helped attunity (prior owners if replicate) build out new features and worked through bugs with them. Their product was not great when we originally started but there were no other solutions in the market except for Golden Gate which had a hefty price tag associated with it.
Chose Qlik Replicate
SSIS lacks real time replication and the only place where it can beat SSIS.
Additionally, has more end point connectors than SSIS,
Chose Qlik Replicate
Both of these work with API's and services, Qlik Replicate does not.
Chose Qlik Replicate
We're still evaluating, but so far Replicate is easier to set up than HVR. I'm not involved with the FiveTran evaluation.
Chose Qlik Replicate
Qlik Replicate's power is in its simple 1:1 copying of database tables and architecture and maintaining a near real-time copy of that database. Talend and SSIS are different tools and more for custom ETL's that require various steps to connect to SFTP or download files. …
Chose Qlik Replicate
We tried MIMIX, SQL SSIS and Veeam but our team found Qlik Replicate had an advantage over all these three in terms of speed, UI, and ease of maintenance.
Chose Qlik Replicate
I have not evaluated any other competing products. Qlik Replicate was the first product we selected for the data lake three years ago, and we have stayed with it ever since.
Features
IBM DataStageQlik Replicate
Data Source Connection
Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Product A and Product B
IBM DataStage
9.5
Ratings
12% above category average
Qlik Replicate
-
Ratings
Connect to traditional data sources10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Transformations
Comparison of Data Transformations features of Product A and Product B
IBM DataStage
8.0
Ratings
2% below category average
Qlik Replicate
-
Ratings
Simple transformations8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Complex transformations8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Modeling
Comparison of Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
IBM DataStage
6.3
Ratings
23% below category average
Qlik Replicate
-
Ratings
Data model creation5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Metadata management5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Business rules and workflow6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Testing and debugging6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Governance
Comparison of Data Governance features of Product A and Product B
IBM DataStage
6.0
Ratings
30% below category average
Qlik Replicate
-
Ratings
Integration with data quality tools6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with MDM tools6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM DataStageQlik Replicate
Small Businesses
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 9.9 out of 10
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Score 7.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
Cohesity
Cohesity
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
Cohesity
Cohesity
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM DataStageQlik Replicate
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.6
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM DataStageQlik Replicate
Likelihood to Recommend
Excellent Cloud data mapping tool and easy creating multiple project data analytics in real-time and the report distribution are excellent via this IBM product. Easy tool to provide data visualization and the integration is effective and helpful to migrating huge amounts of data across other platforms and different websites insights gathering.
Read full review
Qlik Replicate works very well with relational data platforms, both on premise and in the cloud, for example Oracle, SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL and others, it also works very well with DB2. If the data source is MongoDB, it is more complicated and currently there is no possibility of sending data to MongoDB.
Read full review
Pros
  • Very reliable in handling data extraction, data transformation and loading
  • Flexibility in connecting to different type of databases, relational or non-relational
  • Great features such as parallel processing, hash handling, etc.
  • You can also take advantage of its FTP functions, and scheduling features if you need to.
Read full review
  • Qlik Replicate brought a great experience with respect to the ease of implementation and great UI. We had a software that was a blackbox for the team and was very hard to maintain. Qlik Replicate implementation helped us avoid dependency on one resource.
  • Global transformation and in-built functions are what I like in our project.
  • You can customize the conversion/transformation using a JSON file generated by Qlik Replicate, and it is very convenient.
Read full review
Cons
  • You must understand and know the algorithms, since the wrong use of them generates more time in processing.
  • Metadata. You need to develop with connectors, and taking all the Metadata from the menu, all the data that you complete manually, you can't track it.
Read full review
  • The base Replicate web GUI is lacking. If you have dozens or more tasks, it's hard to get a sense of how they're performing. Enterprise Manager solves all of these problems but is a separate install.
  • The support portal is extremely difficult to navigate. It's hard to track down exactly what you're looking for.
  • It would be helpful to have better documentation and example queries for the tables in the Enterprise Manager analytics database.
  • Destination databases that don't support common DDL commands behave unpredictably. And the replication of schema changes isn't consistent.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
The availability of the replicated data in disparate environments has is now crucial. Replacing a product like Qlik Replicate would require significant time, investments, and work. In addition, Qlik Replicate is reasonably reliable with few failures.
Read full review
Usability
Because it is a flexible tool that can manage many flows and create a strong solution with a interesting use of variables. Easy to scale up as you can copy jobs arleady build and modify them. SQL queries allow to be fast in development and have the pushdown feature, but you loose a little of user friendly look. Metadata management is not strong as a visual feature, but can be determine by job codes.
Read full review
We now have greater business flexibility and scalability, and our big data integration projects have a quick rate of growth, which has been profitable for us. Independent of the sources involved, maintaining data consistency between sources is easy. One of my favorite features is the way it lets owners of the source system start and stop processes from updating their system windows.
Read full review
Performance
It could load thousands of records in seconds. But in the Parallel version, you need to understand how to particionate the data. If you use the algorithms erroneously, or the functionalities that it gives for the parsing of data, the performance can fall drastically, even with few records. It is necessary to have people with experience to be able to determine which algorithm to use and understand why.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
IBM offers different levels of support but in my experience being and IBM shop helps to get direct support from more knowledgeable technicians from IBM. Not sure on the cost of having this kind of support, but I know there's also general support and community blogs and websites on the Internet make it easy to troubleshoot issues whenever there's need for that.
Read full review
The issue I've had is that Qlik does an awful job of keeping their customers informed when new versions of the software are available. We found that we were using a version that was no longer supported and could never get help. When it came time to get us upgraded so that we were on a current version, no one knew how to help get us to where we needed to be. We had to purchased professional services time and even then I was basically on my own to get everything built out and set up. Qlik needs to be more proactive with communicating about new releases and how to get your version upgraded in the most secure, safe way possible.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Follow the directions from the Qlik documentation. They are pretty straight forward and easy enough to follow. If you follow these, then you are not likely to have issues on implementation.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No, it wasn’t my decision to use such an ETL product. I’m just the administrator at this point. I’ve heard there are other products there that are even on cloud support. That is much easier to use, more agile, and user-friendly. That doesn’t have that barrier from user to administrator to the developer standpoint.
Read full review
Great tool for data replication solution for Oracle/SQLServers/etc. Real easy to get it set up and start realizing business value. Getting the PoC accomplished in a short window. Product costing and easy to start small and scale as needed. It helped cover most of our ask compared to other solutions.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Not directly related to ROI or cost figures. Only comment here is that IBM tools tend to be more costly than average ETL tools, but it depends on if the company is an IBM shop.
  • One positive aspect is the company has had not a need to switch ETL tool for years.
  • Upgrading to newer versions of the tool brings flexibility in the tool and up-to-date features in relation to other applications.
Read full review
  • Prior to using Qlik Replicate, we used an ETL solution to copy data from the Oracle ERP system to the Microsoft SQL Server BI system at a 15-minute interval. It was very tedious to maintain. Qlik Replicate is much easier to use and we replicate data near real-time now.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Qlik Replicate Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of