IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management

56 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management	Score7 out of 10	N/A	IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) is an end-to-end engineering solution used to manage system requirements to design, workflow, and test management, extending the functionality of ALM tools for better complex-systems development.	N/A

Pricing

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

No setup fee

—

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
Considered Both Products	IBM Steffen Jäschke Projektspezialist bei Steffen Jäschke EinzUnt Physik, Berechnungen in Corporate at Steffen Jäschke EinzUnt Physik, Berechnungen (Professional Training & Coaching, 1-10 employees) Chose IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management The established experience contained in most IBM Rational DOORS installations is only compensated by the high flexibility of Atlassian JIRA. The markets state that Jira is less expensive in the setup. There are many manufacturers that support IBM Rational DOORS to have the big … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management I would choose IBM Rational DOORS over any other requirements management tool out there. Polarion tries to do too many things and is great for some things but as far as requirements management IBM Rational DOORS is the best tool on the market. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management It was easier to do all the change management-related activities, even configurations were handled very effectively. New process definitions and initiatives made it easier for better project deliverables. Effective resource allocations and better reporting and defect … Incentivized Helpful? Kathy Ding Design V&V Engineer in Research & Development at Philips Respironics (Computer Software, 10,001+ employees) Chose IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management DOORS is not a suite nor an integrated tool like HP ALM or Rally. It only does one thing and cannot hold defects or accommodate sprint planning. It is older, takes longer to connect and load, and has an inconvenient timeout. It does do a basic job and can be customized to show … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management DOORS is the legacy and leading tool for requirements management. It is widely used by the Aerospace industry. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management Although JIRA is getting popular in DevOps team, it does not work well with ITIL model as RTC does. RTC is still widely used for production management in our company. CA Service Desk Manager (GSD) is integrated with TPAM which is being used for privilege account management in … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management To me, DOORS is like a super version of Excel and Word combined with a relational database. I have not used too many database softwares before, but DOORS does a very specific job well enough. It is so powerful that some of the tools just go unused. Some parts of the software … Incentivized Helpful? Miguel Angel Merino Vega Systems Analyst in Information Technology at Consultor independiente de software (Computer Software, 1-10 employees) Chose IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management Requisite Pro (and Rational Requirements Composer, it's successor) is more simple and focused on requirements. Is like a part of DOORS and can be suitable to smaller projects. IT people on the other hand prefer agile tools like JIRA. Of course if the project is big enough, … Incentivized Helpful? Puja Doshi Sr Business Analyst in Information Technology at TIAA (Financial Services, 5001-10,000 employees) Chose IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management My organization was already using it when I joined the team. Incentivized Helpful? Qaiser Islam, SPC4 Technical Consultant - IBM Rational in Corporate at Elm Co. (Computer Software, 1001-5000 employees) Chose IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management It's well integrated with IBM products so it provides better coverage across the lifecycle with first class integration. Other producst are stand alone with limited integration with ALM tools. Incentivized Helpful? Giovanni Scioti IT Services Manager in Information Technology at Hewlett-Packard (Insurance, 10,001+ employees) Chose IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management I found [them] to be more flexible and with the possibility to create [an HTML format]. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management An alternative which I have very briefly used is Atlassian's JIRA, which is very similar to IBM RTC, although has a modern UI, feels light-weight and is faster to respond and additionally has seamless integration with Bitbucket, which is a Git platform, and other Atlassian … Incentivized Helpful? Yaron Lavi Head of DevOps and Test Automation in Research & Development at Applied Materials (Semiconductors, 10,001+ employees) Chose IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management JIRA is simpler and much more intuitive, especially when bundled with Confluence. TFS is obvious choice if working with Microsoft technologies and has superb API. Incentivized Helpful? Nishad Pandarathodi IT Project Manager in Information Technology at Cognizant Technology Solutions (Information Technology and Services, 10,001+ employees) Chose IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management I have worked on different agile project management tool like JIRA, Teamfoge and RTC. RTC is simple and has a nice UI. Incentivized Helpful? Srivardhan Dingari Technical Specialist in Engineering at iGATE (Automotive, 10,001+ employees) Chose IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management It is easy for the organization to identify what kind of problems there are in the project and how many change requests have been resolved and how many are pending. Thereby the employer can pro-actively arrange the meetings and address the issues to the team members. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management This product had many of the same features, was easier to use, which would result in less training, and had a lower price tag. Logic and reason do not always figure prominently in a decision. Sometimes there are intangible characteristics that alter the flow. In my observation, … Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic

User Ratings
	IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
Likelihood to Recommend	8.8 (22 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	8.0 (6 ratings)
Usability	2.1 (4 ratings)
Support Rating	5.0 (3 ratings)
Implementation Rating	10.0 (1 ratings)