IBM Targetprocess

IBM Targetprocess

55 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
IBM Targetprocess	Score8.5 out of 10	N/A	IBM Targetprocess is a platform for enterprise agile planning (EAP) and strategic portfolio management (SPM) solutions that allows business and technology planners at all levels to dynamically plan and manage work, resources, investments, programs, and portfolios while ensuring continuous alignment to the enterprise strategy in a single source of truth.	N/A

Pricing

IBM Targetprocess

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
IBM Targetprocess
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes

Required

—

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	IBM Targetprocess
Considered Both Products	Apptio an IBM Company Verified User Chose IBM Targetprocess IBM Targetprocess is more customizable and can adapt to the organization's needs than Jira Algin Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Targetprocess On par with these tools but with room for improvement Incentivized Helpful? Richard Mutschler Head of Lean-agile center of excellence in Corporate at ETAS GmbH (Automotive, 1001-5000 employees) Chose IBM Targetprocess Configurability, Portfolio Management Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Targetprocess Lower cost Easier implementation Less restrictive in terms of customisation Incentivized Helpful? Anupama Sahu Agile Coach in Information Technology at NextEra Energy (Utilities, 10,001+ employees) Chose IBM Targetprocess Great Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Targetprocess Richer capabilities Incentivized Helpful? Matthew Harvey Agile Delivery Chapter Lead at ShopriteX (Retail, 201-500 employees) Chose IBM Targetprocess Better overall usability and FUTURE functionality Cost Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Targetprocess Apptio Targetprocess outshone the competition on several benchmarks. The most important for our team was ease of administration, ease of configuration, cost of licenses, and ability to leverage the tool in multiple areas (not just project management or engineering). Apptio … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Targetprocess During our RFP and demo rating Apptio Targetprocess came out with the highest score by 3% and was the more cost effective of the closer rival. It rated the highest in 4 out of the 8 categories we graded and had one of the most cost effective implementation costs and ranked the … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Targetprocess Apptio Targetprocess has more features and is more flexible for our users and its easier to develop automation rules and metrics than Atlassian JIRA Alige or Planview AgilePlan. Incentivized Helpful? Brent Stevens AVP agile practice management in Information Technology at Cox (Telecommunications, 10,001+ employees) Chose IBM Targetprocess It’s better because of its flexibility and ability to support agile at scale as well as portfolio management in one tool. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Targetprocess I wasn't a decisionmaker on the adoption of Apptio Targetprocess over the competitors so I can't clearly speak to this question. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Targetprocess Others weren't compared Incentivized Helpful? Mohammed Ahtesham Associate TBM Analyst in Information Technology at Cancer Research UK (Research, 1001-5000 employees) Chose IBM Targetprocess I wasn't in the organization while bringing the tool. so cant answer it well Incentivized Helpful? Mohit Verma Agile PM in Information Technology at Wi-Tronix (Railroad Manufacture, 51-200 employees) Chose IBM Targetprocess Targetprocess is fairy easy to use and very customizable tool compared to Jira/Jira Align. Incentivized Helpful? Cameron Falconer Mobile Product Manager in Information Technology at The Access Group (Information Technology & Services, 1001-5000 employees) Chose IBM Targetprocess Prioritization. Incentivized Helpful? William Mannaberg Sr Strategic Sourcing Manager, Operations/Functional Excellence in Professional Services at Honeywell (Oil & Energy, 5001-10,000 employees) Chose IBM Targetprocess It is a more comprehensive solution. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Targetprocess I was not part of the selection process. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM Targetprocess Targetprocess was all around the better tool. They do not nickel-and-dime you and you don't have to deal with multiple products that do, or do not, integrate well together. Below are some of Targetprocess' biggest strengths: Highly customizable; can fit the needs of almost any … Incentivized Helpful? Jarrod Meyer Cloud Infrastructure Engineer in Product Management at BulkSMS (Information Technology & Services, 11-50 employees) Chose IBM Targetprocess More flexible and powerful with custom views for any work in the system. Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic

Features

IBM Targetprocess

Comparison of Project Management features of IBM Targetprocess
Feature	IBM Targetprocess 7.2 21 Ratings
Task Management	8.020 Ratings
Resource Management	9.020 Ratings
Gantt Charts	4.713 Ratings
Scheduling	6.315 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology	8.520 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology	6.617 Ratings
Document Management	6.913 Ratings
Email integration	7.213 Ratings
Mobile Access	5.411 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking	8.713 Ratings
Change request and Case Management	8.111 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management	8.811 Ratings
Search	5.119 Ratings
Visual planning tools	7.119 Ratings

Comparison of Agile Development features of IBM Targetprocess
Feature	IBM Targetprocess 8.5 19 Ratings
DevOps Tool Integrations	8.715 Ratings
Code Review	8.69 Ratings
Code Collaboration	8.69 Ratings
Velocity Calculation	8.417 Ratings
Dependencies and Blockers	8.118 Ratings

User Ratings
	IBM Targetprocess
Likelihood to Recommend	8.5 (29 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	10.0 (2 ratings)
Usability	8.0 (1 ratings)
Availability	9.0 (1 ratings)
Performance	9.0 (1 ratings)
Support Rating	9.0 (4 ratings)
Implementation Rating	7.0 (1 ratings)
Product Scalability	10.0 (1 ratings)