Icinga vs. ManageEngine Site24x7

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Icinga
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Icinga is an open source network monitoring platform. It includes automation, modularized integration packages, and prebuilt alerts and reporting capabilities.N/A
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
Site24x7 from ManageEngine is a full-stack application, website, server, cloud and network monitoring tool. Site24x7 offers code-level diagnostics and customizable error thresholds, end-to-end monitoring with topology visualization tools, and mobile accessibility.
$9
10 monitors
Pricing
IcingaManageEngine Site24x7
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Starter
$9.00
10 monitors
Pro
$35.00
40 Monitors
Classic
$89.00
100 Monitors
Elite
$225.00
250 Monitors
Enterprise
$449.00
500 Monitors
Enterprise Plus Web
$899.00
2500 Monitors
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IcingaManageEngine Site24x7
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee$1 monitors
Additional DetailsEach Pack will also support additional benefits such as Network interfaces, Applogs, Alert credits etc. You can also, purchase add-ons to create custom pricing options. Please visit the vendor's pricing page, for more information.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IcingaManageEngine Site24x7
Considered Both Products
Icinga
Chose Icinga
PRTG was the solution that was implemented before. As Icinga is Open Source we saved the licensing fee, as we ran out of free checks. I also had knowledge in Icinga so we switched over.

Nagios is inferior to Icinga in my opinion, as Icinga has the better Web UI, which I use the …
Chose Icinga
Installation and initial configuration is straight forward. However the system can grow in complexity very quickly, if not managed correctly.
Chose Icinga
The best of commercial products is nearly as good at cross platform monitoring as Icinga, and all of them are expensive.
Chose Icinga
Icinga was initially a fork of Nagios. Over time, the configuration language was replaced with something more programmatic. This configuration language is one of the big sellers of this product. It allows flexible, quick configuration of large sets of hosts and services with …
Chose Icinga
While Icinga holds its own against old stalwarts like Nagios and Zabbix, it simply can't compete with the new generation of SaaS service/server monitoring software in terms of ease of use, feature-completeness, integration with things like Cloudwatch, CloudHealth, New Relic, …
Chose Icinga
There are two main competitors of Icinga in my opinion, Nagios, and NetFlow based monitoring solutions. Both are good, Icinga, is a more refined version of Nagios with a much better API and backwards compatibility to the platform. If you are running Nagios, you can transfer …
Chose Icinga
Icinga is better than Nagios because of its nicer user interface. New Relic can monitor CPU/memory and disk usage, but it's more of a performance and application troubleshooting tool rather than monitoring.
ManageEngine Site24x7
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
Site24x7 [All-in-One Monitoring] has some similarities to ThousandEyes. Especially in the troubleshooting aspect where both offer Web performance waterfall charts to analyze the issue better. Both have cloud-based servers globally that allow to determine performance on the …
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
Manage engine had OPs manager for alerting and security monitoring alerts, but is just not as robust an offering as [Site24x7 All-in-One Monitoring] (RUM.APM features etc..). Originally we had used Nagios on low, to no-cost linux platform, but Nagios will require license also, …
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
Initially, it came down to price. But, if you don't mind having a cloud monitoring solution (versus on-prem) then in my opinion Site24x7 is much easier to setup/manage/configure/use than other options I have managed in the past. Adding monitors takes seconds and I spend almost …
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
The biggest difference between Site24x7 and products like PRTG, Nagios, or Icinga, is that Site24x7 is hosted off the network, completely externally. The others do a great job on network alerts-- and some can even be configured to send SMS or phone calls with the right …
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
Each solution excels in their own areas. Site24x7 provides the easiest and most cost-effective transactional monitoring from the previous and existing solutions which we use. However, Solarwinds Orion suite, which includes the virtualization manager, gives us full-stack …
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
I haven't had a lot of experience evaluating Datadog but from the research and basic demo that we got I understand that it is significantly more expensive, but it does seem to have more AI features and can assist in predicting when/if applications or essential services may go …
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
site24x7 is really unique, I have been using it for many years and always recommend it in my classes. It is ideal for monitoring all web, apps, servers together in one place. Never let a website go down again.
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
I selected this [roduct because I needed something really quick to deploy and that we could easily integrate with our environment without having to deal with firewall setup and other stuff.
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
Simply put, Alertsite from Smartbear is a great product, with top-notch functionality. However, the cost of the platform when using multi-step transactions is incredibly pricey and the cost does not scale well when you want to increase your monitoring. Site24x7 alleviates the …
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
While Applications Manager and CA CEM can give a deep understanding of the services and applications, neither can compare with the shear speed at which Site24x7 can provide for the web performance of sites and how customer satisfaction is associated as well!!!
Features
IcingaManageEngine Site24x7
Monitoring Tasks
Comparison of Monitoring Tasks features of Product A and Product B
Icinga
-
Ratings
ManageEngine Site24x7
8.4
Ratings
8% above category average
Remote monitoring00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Network device monitoring00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Multiple Server Monitoring00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Multi-device monitoring00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Automated alerts and notifications00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Management Tasks
Comparison of Management Tasks features of Product A and Product B
Icinga
-
Ratings
ManageEngine Site24x7
7.4
Ratings
0% above category average
Policy-based automation00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Reporting
Comparison of Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Icinga
-
Ratings
ManageEngine Site24x7
8.5
Ratings
11% above category average
Performance data reports00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Customizable reporting00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Data visualization00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Risk analysis00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Icinga
-
Ratings
ManageEngine Site24x7
6.6
Ratings
6% above category average
Antivirus and malware management00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IcingaManageEngine Site24x7
Small Businesses
ConnectWise Automate
ConnectWise Automate
Score 8.3 out of 10
Panda Systems Management
Panda Systems Management
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Logz.io
Logz.io
Score 7.0 out of 10
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
LogicMonitor
LogicMonitor
Score 8.4 out of 10
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IcingaManageEngine Site24x7
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IcingaManageEngine Site24x7
Likelihood to Recommend
If you're running bare-metal in a datacenter and your hosts are fairly static, it's probably okay to use something like Icinga to monitor your systems. In general, I would not recommend using any monitoring software based on Nagios (Icinga is a fork of Nagios) due to the outdated concepts inherent in those systems. There are a number of good SaaS monitoring solutions which are superior and several open source projects which implement an automation-centric approach to monitoring
Read full review
I have tried other tools (PRTG etc) in the past, and switched from US monitor to [Site24x7 All-in-One Monitoring], for all the built-in features and ability to implement by using with or without the agents deployed (ip discovery LAN). This is one tool that encompasses the entire organization and allows that single pane of glass feel (NOC screen view) for an accurate virtual snapshot of your entire organization, either cloud and/or LAN.
Read full review
Pros
  • I think Icinga has a great search feature. I can always search for the hosts, host groups, or check names. When using just regular Nagios, I don't recall being able to do this search.
  • The fact that I can use Active Directory or LDAP for logins is a great feature.
  • If you are familiar with Nagios, it's very simple to combine the two products to get a polished finished product.
Read full review
  • Alerts: Site24x7 can be configured to send alerts in all sorts of ways, from email, to text messages, to even direct automated phone calls.
  • Internal monitoring: An agent installed on one or more machines can monitor internal connectivity to other network devices. This means if connectivity to a server goes down, we often know about it before users alert us.
  • External monitoring: Site24x7 also watched our websites and sends alerts if they're unreachable. It uses multiple locations to do so, which means if there's a partial network outage in some part of the country, we know who is affected.
Read full review
Cons
  • Decluttering - the dashboard seems to get very overwhelming
  • Segregation - would be helpful to split environments or clients into different areas
  • Alerting
Read full review
  • I wish the advanced monitors were not so expensive.
  • It is a cloud solution, so it is necessary to open up outbound ports in all security zones.
  • If you lose outbound internet service, all your internal servers will throw alarms and life gets extremely noisy.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Icinga is a solid solution which does everything it promises. It is backwards compatible with most Nagios instances, making the transition very easy. Once you get the hang of installing new plugins and editing configuration files expanding its monitoring capabilities are easy.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I have only had to use support once, so I can't go into much detail about their support team. The one time I did use it the response was fast but the resolution took some time.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Icinga was initially a fork of Nagios. Over time, the configuration language was replaced with something more programmatic. This configuration language is one of the big sellers of this product. It allows flexible, quick configuration of large sets of hosts and services with minimal input. Comparing it to other products like WhatsUp Gold, Zenoss, Zabbix, etc., it stands out as incredibly flexible. Adding additional features to Icinga can be as simple as searching for them online. And if they don't yet exist, there is a full API available for custom extensions.
Read full review
Site24x7 [All-in-One Monitoring] has some similarities to ThousandEyes. Especially in the troubleshooting aspect where both offer Web performance waterfall charts to analyze the issue better. Both have cloud-based servers globally that allow to determine performance on the Internet. Site24x7 has more features available so we selected it instead.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • With one check you know which applications are faulty e.g. after an upgrade. Which is big time saver
  • You easily detect outages ion the applications so that your customer ideally does not even realize there was an outage.
  • Detect if the environment does deliver the same result as in the same time as before to detect shortages.
  • Additional information when debugging. Saved us several hours where we could simply point to a database which was slow.
Read full review
  • Positivity wise, we're spending a third of what we were on our website monitoring, this has allowed us to focus funding elsewhere (namely SolarWinds).
  • We have enhanced our core monitoring by now also being able to provide better coverage, whereas we were handicapped with our previous supplier due to the scaling costs of multi-step transactions.
  • The general feeling from our IT staff is that the platform is not great, which obviously reduces confidence in the ability for the platform to provide accurate monitoring data for our websites.
Read full review
ScreenShots

ManageEngine Site24x7 Screenshots

Screenshot of Component wise metric breakdown in a Webpage Speed (Browser) monitorScreenshot of Summary page for a windows server monitorScreenshot of Response time and outages summary for a DNS server monitorScreenshot of Summary page for traces run on a Java applicationScreenshot of Desktop and mobile view of a Website monitorScreenshot of Homepage view