Passly from ID Agent, a Kaseya company and the service that replaces the former AuthAnvil, is an identity and access management (IAM) platform providing two-factor authentication, single sign-on (SSO) and password management.
N/A
Omada Identity Suite
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Omada Identity Suite is the eponymous flagship toolset for identity and access management (IAM) from the relatively established Danish software company for access governance and compliance on the enterprise level.
I selected Passly at first as it would allow for a single sign on with azure to Kaseya VSA. Kaseya has made access to different products very different. VSA does not have single sign on with Azure where as Vorex/BMS does. This is a feature that Kaseya should make unified …
Google's Authenticator app is easy and streamlined, like much of Google's products. The home screen shows you the security code and how much time is left. Kaseya's AuthAnvil requires multiple clicks to even reach the security code, and only has a progress bar that lets you …
Kaseya’s products have a lot of features to them that help an MSP do their job. Accessing and getting to them is a lot easier with AuthAnvil. It’s secure and easy to use. Atera has a similar design, but overall you don’t come close to Kaseya’s products. I often found myself …
We have transitioned our Multi-Factor authentication processes to use either Authy, Duo, or Microsoft Authenticator, depending on the application use-case. We still have some clients using AuthAnvil, but it is no longer our preferred application for MFA. The other offerings in …
I am currently testing Okta as well. Okta seems to have a lot more functionality. They have integrations with mostly every SaaS around. They have a smoother Windows 2FA that includes push notifications and Yubikey integration. AuthAnvil is the only 2FA service available for …
We are pretty satisfied with the features and price of Kaseya. It's easier to deploy than say Entrust or Symantec. What really makes it stand out is the integration with the overall Kaseya environment and managing everything from one pane of glass.
Omada is
providing the desired functionalities that meet our needs as a standard
features. The only custom development that we have identified that is going to
From my experience, Kaseya made a mistake with Passly. It does not work correctly. When it does work it is very delayed causing issues for logging into the system. When Kaseya was contacted they could not find users at all. When they finally found the users they could not edit it needing them to escalate to development to fix accounts.
Omada is with very good and user-friendly interface. There are various access management best practices available and recommended to choose and configure easily. The system works smoothly and is very reliable. The Omada product team is frequently enhancing it and listens to customer feedback. There are out of the box integration capabilities with the most popular systems on the market
In Omada there is no convenient way to track or monitor the progress and status of authorization requests that are raised by other users or even for mine.
There is no way to extend the validity of multiple Contractor/External user accounts by line manager and have to extend them one by one.
Without custom development there is no way to create parallel access approval workflows.
Omada is with very good and user-friendly interface. There are various access management best practices available and recommended to choose and configure easily. The system works smoothly and is very reliable. The Omada product team is frequently enhancing it and listens to customer feedback. There are out of the box integration capabilities with the most popular systems on the market
They are very helpful with helping us with any issues. There are a lot of helpful guides online if you get lost. Kaseya is also good about not bugging you with notifications. Kaseya offers easy to access to support options. Overall I have not had to contact them over a lot of issues. The software rarely broke or was down for maintenance.
We have transitioned our Multi-Factor authentication processes to use either Authy, Duo, or Microsoft Authenticator, depending on the application use-case. We still have some clients using AuthAnvil, but it is no longer our preferred application for MFA. The other offerings in the market fulfill the same requirement with either lower or no additional cost and are easier to manage and more consistent in their performance.
Omada is providing the desired functionalities that meet our needs as a standard features. The only custom development that we have identified that is going to be needed is related to a very specific process that would require development with any other solution that we might go for. The product appears to be highly configurable and is more than we expected from such product. Standard functionality to maintain Business roles from the user interface and also to do a mass changes to business roles via CSV uploads.Integration with SAP GRC for SOD compliance.
Using AuthAnvil to log into Kaseya VSA multiple times was definitely a loss in productivity.
AuthAnvil did provide lots of security for our products because everyone would be deterred by AuthAnvil and Kaseya VSA's labyrinth-like log in process.