IFS Applications vs. Viewpoint Vista

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IFS Applications
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…N/A
Vista
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Viewpoint’s Vista is a construction accounting software. Vista’s core accounting features include accounts receivable and payable, general ledger, payroll and time management, and cash management. It also provides tools for document management, including document templates and reporting.N/A
Pricing
IFS ApplicationsViewpoint Vista
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS ApplicationsVista
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsProspective buyers may contact Viewpoint directly for a price quote.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IFS ApplicationsViewpoint Vista
Considered Both Products
IFS Applications
Chose IFS Applications
IFS Applications have a very UI rich interface compared to other systems. IFS Applications can be easily and quickly learned with the very good documentation, e learning portals and other learning platforms. The technical implementation of the IFS Applications is very …
Chose IFS Applications
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation …
Chose IFS Applications
Microsoft AX, QAD (in continuation of our previous ERP), Sage X3 was an out of the box ERP that was part of initial RFP.

We have chosen IFS based on the compromise between costs & budget, functionality, technical features, and feedback from similar customers that gave their …
Chose IFS Applications
IFS Cloud, IFS Applications and IFS Field Service Management
Vista
Chose Vista
We choose to go with Viewpoint Vista, because it was a great option that allowed complete connection from the Project Managers to the Accounting Team. It allowed us to have one platform or links into the platform from ProjectSight to ensure all of us stay connected without …
Chose Vista
I haven't used any other products for Construction Accounting Software. I've heard of many but don't have any experience reviewing Construction Accounting Software.
Chose Vista
It's been a while since I've used this, but I found JD Edwards completely cumbersome and like a database that hadn't been updated in 10-15 years. I much prefer Viewpoint and I think that Viewpoint still has the ability to improve on its user interface.
Chose Vista
It doesn't COINS was a DOS program and VP is a windows program.
Chose Vista
Vista is made for a specific size company with limited customization needed. It is a great tool until you get to the much bigger size companies.
Chose Vista
Viewpoint is everything from A-Z not only for finance and accounting functions but for project managers as well. Epicor did not have as many functions.
Chose Vista
Vista works with every department linking all data together for everyone to access. The network and portal provide more support than I have ever experienced before.
Chose Vista
There are more options and data kept in Vista that allows us to work on data-driven business decisions. Vista is flexible - we've had to create work arounds in some situations and we've been able to identify those quickly and easily.
Chose Vista
I didn't choose any of these products, they were all in place when I started. Spreadsheet server is easier than creating and manipulating reports in Vista. B2W is used for field logs, equipment management, and bids/estimates. B2W Track and Maintain are easier to configure, is …
Chose Vista
The other softwares didn't have the integration components that Vista had. Vista had a better RoadMap for improvements.
Chose Vista
Many programs have changed since we evaluated others.
Chose Vista
I personally have not used another ERP system other than Viewpoint Vista. I am sure there are others out there, but from listening to my managers experiences before Great Basin Industrial implemented Viewpoint, the other options were less superior to what Viewpoint offers. I …
Chose Vista
Vista is way worse. We didn't select Vista, both companies that I have worked for now use Procore. Vista is terrible.
Chose Vista
We chose Procore after trying Viewpoint Field and Team and found it much more user-friendly, although it was in the early stages of rollout and may have gotten better since then. We also evaluated Timberline but chose Vista as it was more scalable for future use and has …
Chose Vista
We evaluated a few different software options [including] Procore and Trimble ProjectSight and decided Vista by Viewpoint best suited our needs and the price was good.
Features
IFS ApplicationsViewpoint Vista
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.6
Ratings
94% below category average
Viewpoint Vista
8.0
Ratings
11% above category average
Pay calculation4.00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Benefit plan administration4.00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Direct deposit files3.00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.5
Ratings
11% above category average
Viewpoint Vista
7.6
Ratings
0% above category average
API for custom integration8.50 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Plug-ins8.50 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.7
Ratings
17% above category average
Viewpoint Vista
8.3
Ratings
1% above category average
Single sign-on capability10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions9.50 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.8
Ratings
8% above category average
Viewpoint Vista
8.3
Ratings
14% above category average
Dashboards7.00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Standard reports7.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Custom reports9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.4
Ratings
4% below category average
Viewpoint Vista
8.0
Ratings
4% above category average
Accounts payable9.00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Accounts receivable9.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Global Financial Support9.00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers8.50 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations8.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Configurable Accounting8.50 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Standardized Processes9.00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.6
Ratings
8% above category average
Viewpoint Vista
7.3
Ratings
8% below category average
Inventory tracking8.50 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Automatic reordering9.00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Location management9.00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
5.4
Ratings
37% below category average
Viewpoint Vista
7.8
Ratings
1% below category average
Pricing8.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Order entry8.50 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Credit card processing6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold6.50 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Order Orchestration6.50 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.4
Ratings
75% below category average
Viewpoint Vista
7.6
Ratings
1% above category average
Billing Management6.50 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management7.50 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management7.50 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting6.50 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Period Close8.50 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.7
Ratings
95% below category average
Viewpoint Vista
8.0
Ratings
5% above category average
Budgeting and Forecasting3.00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Project Costing6.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Cost Capture5.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Capital Project Management2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance2.00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition2.00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.6
Ratings
62% below category average
Viewpoint Vista
7.1
Ratings
4% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers9.00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality8.00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
10.0
Ratings
29% above category average
Viewpoint Vista
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.3
Ratings
71% below category average
Viewpoint Vista
7.5
Ratings
8% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Authoring7.00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Contract Repository7.00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated9.50 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Supplier Management9.50 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.6
Ratings
35% below category average
Viewpoint Vista
-
Ratings
Risk Repository8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Management8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Detection6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.3
Ratings
6% below category average
Viewpoint Vista
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.2
Ratings
18% below category average
Viewpoint Vista
-
Ratings
Production Process Design8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Production Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration Management7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Work Execution8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.5
Ratings
18% above category average
Viewpoint Vista
7.4
Ratings
4% above category average
Forecasting7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Planning9.00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Performance Monitoring9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.2
Ratings
52% below category average
Viewpoint Vista
-
Ratings
Proposal Management7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IFS ApplicationsViewpoint Vista
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IFS ApplicationsViewpoint Vista
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.9
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
7.1
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IFS ApplicationsViewpoint Vista
Likelihood to Recommend
Not every Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System does not cover all the industry verticals and all the functionalities and requirements for a specific industry as built-in features. Although IFS Applications does not completely cover all the requirements and all the industry verticals, it can be implemented for any industrial company with minimum configurations and customization, which is very good when implementing an ERP system. Since it supports web and mobile versions of the application as well, the users ind it easy to use.
Read full review
The company has made a commitment to the use of the Vista products and continue to move forward trying to implement more with the Vista HR Management. From timekeeping to onboarding in the near future we strive to look for better ways to utilize the products for our accounting and payroll purposes.
Read full review
Pros
  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Complex Inventory
Read full review
  • Being on a Microsoft SQL platform enables easier development and integration with 3rd party software.
  • It has a very flexible User Defined fields and tables system to allow customizing to the user's needs without breaking standard features.
  • Security management is very granular.
Read full review
Cons
  • Project Budget control other than Procurement
  • Customer Advance settlement process should be Manual rather then Auto Adjustment
  • IFS GSO Support should be more proactive
Read full review
  • Their payroll module is terribly slow and very clunky.
  • Job costing parameters are very strict and limited.
  • Each module interface has too many forms and screens.
  • There is too much flexibility regarding where to put information into the system. There isn't one place to do anything, which creates confusion for staff.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
It is extremely customizable and tracks so many complicated costs very well, more-so than other construction software programs out there that we've used in the past. It is also not an easy program to use for those even slightly not comfortable with a computer. The help sections/knowledge base could be better organized and updated more. It is a very powerful software program for our business and we rely on it hugely to see how our projects are running in real-time.
Read full review
Usability
In overall, the companies get many advantages, where we can forget most of the things which can be considered for room for improvement. The user interface is good. It supports mobile versions an has several mobile applications for specific areas with Android, IOS and Windows versions. It allows several deployment options such as remote hosting, IFS Cloud hosting and on-premise hosting of the servers. IFS Applications can be easily and safely integrated with other systems.
Read full review
I think that Vista's is an easy program to use very user friendly with lots of help features to allow the user to fix an issue without having to put a support call into Vista. The reporting and exporting capability's are strong.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Only issue is when there is an upgrade - it takes several times to get back logged in. Otherwise no issues with getting on to the program. We are set up on lap top or on the remote desk top. Works 90% of the time
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
No issue downloading the reports - I do find sometimes it is easier to export and save than it is to print to a pdf. Options on the different reports not consistent. You can print a couple projects on the JC Contract Status Report - but you have to do each project for the JC Cost by contract item - when neither one is a drill down - not a big deal
Read full review
Support Rating
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Read full review
Support has deteriorated greatly than what it was years ago when we joined. We always used to get a call back same day and within an hour or so for critical issues. Sometimes now it's no response or very delayed. Knowledge of the support team is also lacking. Many issues we figure out workarounds ourselves instead of calling
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
I was not part of the in person training. I am assuming the training went well - but I did all my training through viewpoint academy.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Excellent training! They keep you on track to insure your implementation is going as planned. There are ample ways to receive additional training and training can be provided by position type. If you put on the effort, the training is there.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
The trainer Viewpoint sent did not understand the processes, he only knew where the modules were located. He had no understanding of the actual process itself.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft AX, QAD (in continuation of our previous ERP), Sage X3 was an out of the box ERP that was part of initial RFP. We have chosen IFS based on the compromise between costs & budget, functionality, technical features, and feedback from similar customers that gave their feedback. The project manager team and qualification level of technical or consultant teams were differentiating factors too. Finally IFS application was named in the Gartner’s mid-market ERP Magic Quadrant, along with SAP, and helped us to finalize our choice
Read full review
I personally have not used another ERP system other than Viewpoint Vista. I am sure there are others out there, but from listening to my managers experiences before Great Basin Industrial implemented Viewpoint, the other options were less superior to what Viewpoint offers. I think if you are looking for an ERP system in the construction industry, then Viewpoint is the way to go
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
For a small business - this program is well used in the accounting and operations. The two different work plans are set up for success. Alot of the programs we do not use - but like the reports that are generated - one disadvantage if you do not know crystal reports you cannot edit your form to meet your needs so there is a lot of printing different several forms to get all the information you need.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Positive impact in terms of global process alignment.
  • Positive impact in terms of a single system of truth and reporting.
Read full review
  • Not sure I can speak to this as the company moved to Viewpoint before I began here. I think it is helpful for the Project Management and Superintendent staff to easily review how specific job items went, which we do in the PM contract drilldown analysis
Read full review
ScreenShots

IFS Applications Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of

Vista Screenshots

Screenshot of Job Cost AccountingScreenshot of Equipment ManagementScreenshot of Service ManagementScreenshot of Service Management Dispatch Board