Brassring vs. Tempus Central

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Brassring
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
Brassring, formerly from IBM and part of the Kenexa Talent Acquisition Suite, and now sold by Infinite Computer Solutions, is an enterprise grade ATS and onboarding solution. It allows companies to find the right talent, track and manage candidates, and use candidate data to spot trends within the applicant pool.N/A
Tempus Central
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Tempus Central, by Compucare India Pvt. Ltd., is a product focused on the HR department of an organization. Its attendance processing engine can cater to minute details in the HR processes - from Biometric attendance punches and rostering to field staff management to shift timing management and even statutory compliances. Tempus Central does it all and provides reports on demand. Beyond attendance Tempus Central delivers end to end workforce management solution. Tempus…N/A
Pricing
BrassringTempus Central
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BrassringTempus Central
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsTempus Central, the product price starts from 70 USD per user license.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BrassringTempus Central
Considered Both Products
Brassring
Chose Brassring
The primary reason of still going with Kenexa is because we have been using it for quite some time now. And considering it is used by more than 30 countries, it makes the training and communication about Kenexa easy. Also purchasing this license for a longer period (3, 5 years) …
Chose Brassring
It stacks up well against Bullhorn CRM for candidate retrieval but not as streamlined or automated.
Chose Brassring
SF ATS was not available at the time and Taleo was thought to be too expensive. In retrospect, given the amount of customization and leveraging of other vendor technology for things like analytics I suspect any cost advantage we realized evaporated.
Chose Brassring
We recently started using Assess for our Food Service and Area Managers and the results have not been as accurate as Kenexa. We have since made some bad hires off the results of Assess, we have had one particular Area Manager that scored in the "Best" category and her behavior …
Chose Brassring
Kenexa fares very poorly in practice against almost anything else. It checks the boxes of raw functionality, and offers wide customization. However, in practice it is a nightmare to use for almost everything. I was not part of the initial implementation, so I am not aware of …
Chose Brassring
Kenekxa removes the CV's after 90 days even when the recruitment process for the position is still in progress so you basically have have a situations where the CV put up by a consultant is automatically removed without any information to Client or Consultant and that candidate …
Chose Brassring
I did not have much to do with the selection process, but I found out that OpenHire was in the running, which is the worst system I have ever worked with. I was able to share my OpenHire experience, and hopefully that assisted with the selection of Kenexa. Compared to other …
Chose Brassring
We used Kenexa due to its price. But the ultimate thing that we learned in the end is that: you get what you pay for.
It wasn't so awful that we wanted to just do physical recruiting, but then again it wasn't good enough to where we were happy with our results.
Bullhorn is …
Chose Brassring
Kenexa allowed for the requisition process to automated where as Ceridian's version I worked on did not. Also the Kenexa version allows multiple copies of an applications where the Ceridian version I previously used did not and made affirmative action harder to comply with.
Chose Brassring
I have used PeopleSoft eRecruit which was horrible and didn't give the recruiters the ability to source for candidates inside the system. We just implemented Workday Recruit in the last month and it has many functionality deficincies right now but it is a new product and they …
Chose Brassring
JobDiva, Maxhire. Kenexa is a much cleaner interface than the other two - appears to be a standard system across organizations.
Chose Brassring
I didn't! However, I have used both SmartSearch and SilkRoad OpenHire extensively. SmartSearch is fantastic for recruiter geeks who really want to find out all the neat things that are available. It's fast, super easy to use, and quite elegant in design. Probably not a good …
Tempus Central
Chose Tempus Central
We selected Tempus Central for its flexibility and amount of policy setups we could do. Our complex requirements especially Night Shift management were not available with the most readily available HRMS. Hence, we move forward with Attendance Management first and maybe then we …
Features
BrassringTempus Central
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
7.5
Ratings
6% below category average
Tempus Central
-
Ratings
Job Requisition Management7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Company Website Posting7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Publish to Social Media7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Customized Application Form7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Resume Management7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Candidate Search8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Email Templates7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
User Permissions7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
-
Ratings
Tempus Central
10.0
Ratings
24% above category average
Employee demographic data00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Organizational charting00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
-
Ratings
Tempus Central
7.5
Ratings
6% below category average
Pay calculation00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
-
Ratings
Tempus Central
10.0
Ratings
22% above category average
Approval workflow00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
-
Ratings
Tempus Central
10.0
Ratings
21% above category average
View and generate pay and benefit information00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Employee recognition00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
-
Ratings
Tempus Central
10.0
Ratings
29% above category average
Report builder00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Ability to combine HR data with external data00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
-
Ratings
Tempus Central
5.0
Ratings
44% below category average
Review status tracking00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BrassringTempus Central
Small Businesses
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 9.1 out of 10
Dayforce Powerpay
Dayforce Powerpay
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 9.1 out of 10
Paypro Workforce Management
Paypro Workforce Management
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
PeopleStrong
PeopleStrong
Score 10.0 out of 10
PeopleStrong
PeopleStrong
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BrassringTempus Central
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
2.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BrassringTempus Central
Likelihood to Recommend
Other products in the same category as Kenexa 2x BrassRing would be Taleo and PeopleFluent. I would also look into Avature as an ATS option. I am currently on the sourcing side of the recruitment process and use Avature for tracking and candidate mining purposes. I would recommend getting any kind of demo possible since the user interfaces vary quite a bit between them. Ease of use and overall stability should be kept in mind when comparing ATS prices.
Read full review
If you are a manufacturing company, managing a few hundred blue-collar workers, you definitely need Tempus Central. This is the cheapest option we found so far, with all the required features. If you are a small company with fairly simple attendance policy settings and not many shifts, you can avoid using Tempus Central.
Read full review
Pros
  • Kenexa allows Boolean key word search within a particular requisition so it makes sifting through a high number of applicants manageable and effective
  • Kenexa can be tailored to meet individual business needs. During the time we’ve had Kenexa here I’ve used it in support of a few different business segments and for each the way the system was used to “position” candidate statuses have varied based on the individual need of the business. One example is when interviewing a high volume of applicants internationally, we were able to send qualified applicants through to the “event manager” and it would enable the candidate to select his/her interview date/time based on previously submitted options inputted by our Kenexa users.
  • Kenexa allows one to customize and score questions for each open requisition that applicants complete as they apply. The system then sorts applicants according to the score of candidate answers allowing for easy sorting of top qualified candidates.
Read full review
  • Gives us flexibility to set up attendance policy for various types of people
  • It manages our Night shifts and Over Time policy very well
  • It integrates well with the Biometric Devices, HRMS and Payroll system
Read full review
Cons
  • Setting up integrations is extremely tedious. For instance, setting up an address feed would have required sending over 5 different spreadsheets on a daily basis (one each for every facility name, street address, zip code, state, country) and a 6th sheet to make the connection between the other 5 elements. We opted not to set up that integration as a result.
Read full review
  • I would like to see a few more analytics in the software
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
I am confident that the Kenexa product will continue to evolve to meet the needs of our business in an ever changing work environment. The affiliation with IBM also plays a factor as we have a long standing successful relationship with IBM products. We will be looking to integrate other Kenexa products in the near future to streamline our HR processes.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
There is nothing that a recruiter needs to do that they can't do with Kenexa 2XB but the proprietary, old fashioned UI is far from intuitive to use. I only rate 2XB this highly because the SaaS is up most of the time, performance is usually reasonable, and it does actually work.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Just slow for what we are doing here
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
It is a very basic system. It may be OK for entry level positions only. The practice of removing CVs while the recruitment process is ON is disturbing and there is no one to explain or to inform why it is being done. Even a routine mail is not sent to the client/consultant. I am surprised how this system is continuing without too many complaints.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
We purchased an out of the box solution and that worked well for us.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
The primary reason of still going with Kenexa is because we have been using it for quite some time now. And considering it is used by more than 30 countries, it makes the training and communication about Kenexa easy. Also purchasing this license for a longer period (3, 5 years) makes it very cost effective as well.
Read full review
We selected Tempus Central for its flexibility and amount of policy setups we could do. Our complex requirements especially Night Shift management were not available with the most readily available HRMS. Hence, we move forward with Attendance Management first and maybe then we will move towards implementing an HRMS on our premises.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Kenexa has assisted us in identifying top talent within our target market of applicants.
  • Kenexa may exclude potentially good associates that don't test well.
  • Kenexa clearly defines specific categories and general notes for training, development, & coaching of associates on areas of opportunity.
Read full review
  • Our HRs save 4 days every month by automating attendance management
  • No more excel sheet management, hence we get organized data in one place
  • Ability to analyze employees' efficiency and productivity
Read full review
ScreenShots

Tempus Central Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Daily Attendance Data