Intapp in Palo Alto offers Intapp Time, a legal billing application focusing on managing alternate fee structures and rich information for analysis and optimization.
N/A
Jobber
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Jobber is field service management software from the company of the same name in Edmonton, Alberta.
$39
per month 1 user
Pricing
Intapp Time
Jobber
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Core
$39
per month 1 user
Connect (individual)
$119
per month 1 user
Connect
$169
per month up to 5 users
Grow (individual)
$199
per month 1 user
Grow
$349
per month up to 10 users
Plus
$599
per month Up to 15 users
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Intapp Time
Jobber
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Discount available for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Intapp Time
Jobber
Considered Both Products
Intapp Time
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Intapp Time
We also looked at the timekeeping software that is a part of our accounting system which is fully integrated into that product. IntApp time provides a better user interface while providing all the integration necessary for our accounting system to capture all the essential …
There are three competitors to Intapp Time that I know of, and have looked at, but it's been years. Those competitors are Element55, Aderant Found Time and Smart Time. Every time I compared any of those products to the current version of Intapp Time then Intapp Time came out on …
I felt Jobber is easier to use than yardbook. The Jobber App is huge and so easy to use in the field. Yardbook doesn’t offer an app for IOS as of this date.
Jobber is a one stop for all program and a lot easier in usage. It is a lot more streamlined and everything is way more transparent for both the clients and employees. Time tracking is also very accurate and gps is also tracked which makes it very nice. Client also has the …
More expensive than Jobber and more complicated. Pretty much does the same tasks. I canceled after 2 days of Housecall Pro and continued using Jobber. Jobber makes my life simple and I need that while running a busy cleaning company.
Square only allows for scheduling to one person. And my team couldn’t see their schedules. As a cleaning company, I need to let cleaners know what their pay is without them seeing what I’m charging. That’s game changer about Kobber.
We looked at Housecall Pro, Fieldroutes, and Skedulo. Jobber seemed like a better fit and came highly recommended by someone who has another property management company.
(FieldEdge) Jobber has a much better mobile app that is intuitive and easily used. Also, the process flows better its natural progression, it is much simpler (the competition was adding and adding features) and serves all the needs with its simplicity, it is much neater in the …
IntApp time is well-suited for capturing time and automating that capture in some instances. It does not provide a wealth of information regarding the time it captures. For example, auto-detecting client/matter numbers based on past time entries. As mentioned, the timer functions of the product are well thought out, easy to use and popular among our timekeepers.
The cost of Jobber is not suitable for a startup - even our company size is hard pressed to squeeze in other areas of business to afford the cost. Zenmaid or other maid-forward services may be better suited since Jobber seems to focus it's offerings on one-off as opposed to recurring services like ours. For business who do in-person estimates like ours, the streamlined estimate feature which causes increased conversion rates makes it worth the cost - as we anecdotally gain more business this way. However, if we switch to an online booking / instant booking model as opposed to in-person estimates, we may not require this feature. Zenmaid has a "gamified" residential booking page that was extremely high converting for us - we received sometimes 30+ inquiries per day due to the ease of use - MANY more completed inquiries than we receive now - but they didn't have a quoting and deposit collection tool - so here we are. If we used their instant booking feature we would have stayed due to the scheduling tool, gap finder, prevention of double booking employees, and cleaning service focus, as well as significantly reduced pricing.
It captures activity on your PC -- e.g. reading an e-mail, editing a document. It can be customized to track other activities -- e.g. if you use a particular PDF tool, or use a particular web site for legal research.
It captures phone activity.
It captures calendar appointments.
It is really low maintenance, and seems to have a very light footprint on the client.
The recurring job feature was key to our decision in selecting Jobber. There's a lot of flexibility in how you schedule recurring work. I especially like that you can select the frequency (weekly, monthly) coupled with either a specific date or day of the week/month.
Client email reminders help our clients know when we're coming and provide an important point of contact. Customizing the email was easy.
Client overview. It's extremely helpful to be able to view a client's record and see the upcoming visits along with the completed work.
When I open Jobber for daily use, we frequently need to clear advertisements - specifically regarding referring Jobber to others. If it were related to product updates, it may be more relevant, but consistent referral promotions or online web-events are not what I want to clear when I just want to get to work in my expensive crm software
Reports are frustratingly bulky and inconsistently formatted - the report generator doesn't include all reports, most notably missing is timesheets. An extra step to view the list of available reports was recently added after additions to paid, optional service offerings were placed higher on the menu, requiring scrolling to reach the reports.
A web developer was hired by us to streamline some of our necessary reports into a calculation / report upload tool. Further changes were made to the actual reports on Jobber's end that were (very minorly helpful for us and not worth the cost or the effort put into the upgrade that I could tell, in the fact that) we have to pay the developer to rework our calculation tool due to simple changes in the order of the columns
Scheduling - we were optimistic about the beta schedule but the absence of dispatch view is a glaring gap. Additional page realestate is used in the beta mode that makes less of the schedule visible. Changes were made to "complete" job's next steps that add work for us.
Jobber is an easy-to-use and friendly software designed for efficiency. Its interface is well-organized, ensuring that each section is intuitive and accessible. Users can navigate smoothly through tasks, making project management simpler. Overall, Jobber enhances productivity and streamlines operations, making it a valuable tool for various projects.
There is hardly an app that covers it all while staying simple and wrapping up the process. From the filing of the request, everything goes smoothly following a natural progression. Reports are insightful, give you an instant overview and easy to understand. In addition, you can easily track any information from those on clients to expense tracking.
There are three competitors to Intapp Time that I know of, and have looked at, but it's been years. Those competitors are Element55, Aderant Found Time and Smart Time. Every time I compared any of those products to the current version of Intapp Time then Intapp Time came out on top. Element 55 seemed have a bit of a clunky interface when I last looked. Aderant Found Time seemed like a limited success at copying Intapp Time; the software itself seemed a little burdensome, both on the client and the back end.
More expensive than Jobber and more complicated. Pretty much does the same tasks. I canceled after 2 days of HouseCall Pro and continued using Jobber. Jobber makes my life simple and I need that while running a busy cleaning company
