| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Jobber | Score7.8 out of 10 | N/A | Jobber is field service management software from the company of the same name in Edmonton, Alberta. | $39 per month 1 user |
| Jobber | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| ||||||||||
| Offerings |
| ||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||
| Additional Details | Discount available for annual pricing. | ||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | |||||||||||
| Jobber | |
|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Jobber Companies not present above include ZenMaid & Booking Koala - most common in the cleaning world. I addressed comparisons in the previous question. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Jobber Incentivized Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Jobber Jobber is a one stop for all program and a lot easier in usage. It is a lot more streamlined and everything is way more transparent for both the clients and employees. Time tracking is also very accurate and gps is also tracked which makes it very nice. Client also has the … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Jobber Very similar set up, easy to use but Jobber allows you to have more freedom. Your are not stuck trying to figure out invoices, and what goes where. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Jobber This software is designed for our industry and is user friendly for our clients as well. I would like to see the client side grow a bit more, though. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Jobber Haven’t use another platform Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Jobber We looked at HouseCall Pro, FieldRoutes, and Skedulo. Jobber seemed like a better fit and came highly recommended by someone who has another property management company. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Jobber Jobber was the best for us by offering the right amount of professional features while not being overwhelming for a small company to use. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | |
| Would buy again | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Jobber | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 2.1 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 2.0 |
| Usability | 5.0 |
| Support Rating | 4.0 |
