I felt Jobber is easier to use than yardbook. The Jobber App is huge and so easy to use in the field. Yardbook doesn’t offer an app for IOS as of this date.
Jobber is a one stop for all program and a lot easier in usage. It is a lot more streamlined and everything is way more transparent for both the clients and employees. Time tracking is also very accurate and gps is also tracked which makes it very nice. Client also has the …
More expensive than Jobber and more complicated. Pretty much does the same tasks. I canceled after 2 days of Housecall Pro and continued using Jobber. Jobber makes my life simple and I need that while running a busy cleaning company.
Square only allows for scheduling to one person. And my team couldn’t see their schedules. As a cleaning company, I need to let cleaners know what their pay is without them seeing what I’m charging. That’s game changer about Kobber.
We looked at Housecall Pro, Fieldroutes, and Skedulo. Jobber seemed like a better fit and came highly recommended by someone who has another property management company.
(FieldEdge) Jobber has a much better mobile app that is intuitive and easily used. Also, the process flows better its natural progression, it is much simpler (the competition was adding and adding features) and serves all the needs with its simplicity, it is much neater in the …
Method:CRM is a more affordable and user-friendly CRM. It is easier to manage Method:CRM without having to purchase a bunch of add-ons like you do with Salesforce. You get what you see in the demonstration without hidden costs. The ability to create custom fields is great. …
Method communicates with QuickBooks better than Salesforce did. Method also provides better tools for notes and opportunities than Business Central or ACT!
Easier to use than Autorask or Manage. Less expensive than Salesforce while still delivering a lot of functionality, 8n a slightly less elegant fashion.
We were using Quickbooks Desktop Enterprise for a very long time. However, the software is archaic and dated. Method allows us to step into the 21st century. We now have much more online / automated interactions with our customers. We like that Method also lets us customize a …
We chose Method over Salesforce because we felt as though they were not tailored to our size of the company and our specific needs overall. They offered many things that we found very appealing but at the end of the day, we knew that with most importantly we needed a CRM to …
Work is essentially a calendar and a set of tasks. Method allows me to set up recurring onboarding task lists and keep track of all customer touchpoint in one place.
We chose Method:CRM for the QuickBooks integration. It was important for us to have integrations that allowed us to view payments, organize our contacts, and manage our sales force. There were some learning curves, however, such as creating activities, leads, customers and …
Method is by far the easiest of all platforms. It brings a lot of great features that salesforce has as well as email campaign features like constant contact, all in one. The only thing I would add would be more reporting and custom report capability.
Method is really designed for those who use QuickBooks. I like there is no cost to integrate with the software. Like other crm the user would have to an additional to integrate, but all features of QuickBooks would not able to integrate especially payments. Method has all …
I was not a part of the selection process of Method:CRM but I was part of the decision to cancel the service and I was a part of the decision-making group that found the alternative solution to what Method was doing for us. The thing that set the others apart from Method was …
Connectwise was a great product it was just not cost effective for our company. We actually really liked how Connectwise worked, it was just WAY too expensive.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Method:CRM
I love the infinite customization available in Method CRM. No other CRM offers as much ROI and flexibility of design of the user interface. However Method's built-in feature set doesn't include many of the extras that might be found in a more niche product. Furthermore, while …
Features
Jobber
Method:CRM
Sales Force Automation
Comparison of Sales Force Automation features of Product A and Product B
Jobber
-
Ratings
Method:CRM
8.0
Ratings
4% above category average
Customer data management / contact management
00 Ratings
8.30 Ratings
Workflow management
00 Ratings
8.30 Ratings
Territory management
00 Ratings
1.80 Ratings
Opportunity management
00 Ratings
8.30 Ratings
Integration with email client (e.g., Outlook or Gmail)
00 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Contract management
00 Ratings
8.70 Ratings
Quote & order management
00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Interaction tracking
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Channel / partner relationship management
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Customer Service & Support
Comparison of Customer Service & Support features of Product A and Product B
Jobber
-
Ratings
Method:CRM
10.0
Ratings
28% above category average
Case management
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Call center management
00 Ratings
9.90 Ratings
Help desk management
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Marketing Automation
Comparison of Marketing Automation features of Product A and Product B
Jobber
-
Ratings
Method:CRM
8.9
Ratings
16% above category average
Lead management
00 Ratings
8.80 Ratings
Email marketing
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
CRM Project Management
Comparison of CRM Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Jobber
-
Ratings
Method:CRM
7.5
Ratings
1% below category average
Task management
00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Billing and invoicing management
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
3.40 Ratings
CRM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CRM Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Jobber
-
Ratings
Method:CRM
7.7
Ratings
2% above category average
Forecasting
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Pipeline visualization
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Customizable reports
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Jobber
-
Ratings
Method:CRM
7.5
Ratings
0% above category average
Custom fields
00 Ratings
6.40 Ratings
Custom objects
00 Ratings
6.40 Ratings
Scripting environment
00 Ratings
9.20 Ratings
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Jobber
-
Ratings
Method:CRM
8.2
Ratings
1% below category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
8.30 Ratings
Integrations with 3rd-party Software
Comparison of Integrations with 3rd-party Software features of Product A and Product B
Jobber
-
Ratings
Method:CRM
10.0
Ratings
31% above category average
Marketing automation
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Compensation management
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Platform
Comparison of Platform features of Product A and Product B
The cost of Jobber is not suitable for a startup - even our company size is hard pressed to squeeze in other areas of business to afford the cost. Zenmaid or other maid-forward services may be better suited since Jobber seems to focus it's offerings on one-off as opposed to recurring services like ours. For business who do in-person estimates like ours, the streamlined estimate feature which causes increased conversion rates makes it worth the cost - as we anecdotally gain more business this way. However, if we switch to an online booking / instant booking model as opposed to in-person estimates, we may not require this feature. Zenmaid has a "gamified" residential booking page that was extremely high converting for us - we received sometimes 30+ inquiries per day due to the ease of use - MANY more completed inquiries than we receive now - but they didn't have a quoting and deposit collection tool - so here we are. If we used their instant booking feature we would have stayed due to the scheduling tool, gap finder, prevention of double booking employees, and cleaning service focus, as well as significantly reduced pricing.
Method[:CRM] is well suited when you have a large company that needs to keep track of customers. It also connects with Quickbooks and that has really been nice for our organization. Our company is small so this really helps us stay on track and build our data base of customers.
The recurring job feature was key to our decision in selecting Jobber. There's a lot of flexibility in how you schedule recurring work. I especially like that you can select the frequency (weekly, monthly) coupled with either a specific date or day of the week/month.
Client email reminders help our clients know when we're coming and provide an important point of contact. Customizing the email was easy.
Client overview. It's extremely helpful to be able to view a client's record and see the upcoming visits along with the completed work.
When I open Jobber for daily use, we frequently need to clear advertisements - specifically regarding referring Jobber to others. If it were related to product updates, it may be more relevant, but consistent referral promotions or online web-events are not what I want to clear when I just want to get to work in my expensive crm software
Reports are frustratingly bulky and inconsistently formatted - the report generator doesn't include all reports, most notably missing is timesheets. An extra step to view the list of available reports was recently added after additions to paid, optional service offerings were placed higher on the menu, requiring scrolling to reach the reports.
A web developer was hired by us to streamline some of our necessary reports into a calculation / report upload tool. Further changes were made to the actual reports on Jobber's end that were (very minorly helpful for us and not worth the cost or the effort put into the upgrade that I could tell, in the fact that) we have to pay the developer to rework our calculation tool due to simple changes in the order of the columns
Scheduling - we were optimistic about the beta schedule but the absence of dispatch view is a glaring gap. Additional page realestate is used in the beta mode that makes less of the schedule visible. Changes were made to "complete" job's next steps that add work for us.
The things Method does well - QuickBooks data integration and extreme customization - it does very, very well. If you are looking for a CRM product or any business process automation software that integrates with QuickBooks, you have to look at Method CRM
Jobber is an easy-to-use and friendly software designed for efficiency. Its interface is well-organized, ensuring that each section is intuitive and accessible. Users can navigate smoothly through tasks, making project management simpler. Overall, Jobber enhances productivity and streamlines operations, making it a valuable tool for various projects.
I'm fairly new to the company and have only been using Method for the last year and the ease of use has been a blessing for me. I've self trained on most of the aspects and have incorporated new operations in the company, based on what Method has to offer, that have enhanced the productivity for all associates.
There is hardly an app that covers it all while staying simple and wrapping up the process. From the filing of the request, everything goes smoothly following a natural progression. Reports are insightful, give you an instant overview and easy to understand. In addition, you can easily track any information from those on clients to expense tracking.
The support is great. They are on the line within minutes and share screen to figure out the problem immediately. I would highly recommend this product for that reason. I do wish the customization was a bit easier to use; however, with fewer settings that are available to the end user and an easier way to read the customization.
Be available to learn! There is a huge learning curve to this program. You have to be willing to take it all in. Be available to the Method expert and be patient.
More expensive than Jobber and more complicated. Pretty much does the same tasks. I canceled after 2 days of HouseCall Pro and continued using Jobber. Jobber makes my life simple and I need that while running a busy cleaning company
We were using QuickBooks Desktop Enterprise for a very long time. However, the software is archaic and dated. Method allows us to step into the 21st century. We now have much more online / automated interactions with our customers. We like that Method also lets us customize a great deal of the software to our exact needs and wants