JW Player (or JWP) is a video platform boasting 40,000 broadcasters, publishers, and other video-driven brands whose business relies on video as users. It provides these companies with a way to accelerate and scale their video strategy and is a video platform that can be used to stream video, engage audiences on any screen, and monetize content.
N/A
Kaltura
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Kaltura, headquartered in New York, offers enterprise or large scale video storage, streaming, and distribution supporting a variety of purposes such as streaming, enterprise video portal, interactive video and virtual classroom, or podcasting.
JW had more player options, a better/more intuitive user interface, was altogether faster both in rendering the uploaded videos and in time to load on the web page. The integration with OpenX for pre-roll was faster and easier than with Brightcove, and lastly, they offered a …
JW Player is the most widely used internet video player out there, so it was an easy choice for us to trust JW with our video content and delivery. What impressed me most was their hunger to improve and satisfy our business needs. Many of their competitors weren't nearly as …
JW Player is competitive with VideoJS and MediaElements. Though we preferred VideoJS based on some features for its player attributes for years, we ultimately switched to JW Player due to its platform capabilities, functionality and recent investments the firm was making to …
Kaltura was the best option given the sheer volume of people we needed to support digitally. Others were better in their own regard, but due to limitations in number of attendees or sessions, Kaltura was the best option.
Kaltura integration with LMS and overall support for instruction gives it a big edge over these other solutions. For instance, While Zoom can work very well for video conferencing, Kaltura allows an unparalleled integration with the LMS, from attendance to grading. Also, the …
We used (or are still using for some extent) these services for different purposes (internal or in favor of our customers). Usually the decision of "which platform to use" is based on specific customers' needs and trying to solve their needs with the proper integration, so I …
Unlike Vimeo or YouTube, Kaltura provides organizational control over the content. Users have control of their personal media, but administrators can remove or unpublish content as needed. It is essentially a private, organization managed version of these public video …
Panopto is a much cheaper option (based on a pay per view model) but the user experience is not nearly as good. The video portal UI is difficult to navigate and the recording feature requires downloading separate desktop software that differs greatly from PC to MAC. Inline …
We considered a couple of options 2 years ago. One of those options has since been sold and dismantled. Kaltura was really the best product in this space. Now, Canvas is releasing its own video solution very soon and it has some nice workflow features. It remains to be seen if …
In 2011 we looked at ShareStream and MDID3. Kaltura was the only system at the time that had a Blackboard building block. The newest Blackboard versions have a "video everywhere" feature that connects to a users You Tube account. But a user needs to log into that account before …
We have not made a side-by-side comparison to other products in this field, so we cannot say how Kaltura stacks up against alternatives. Kaltura was selected without substantial input by our department.
Features
JW Player
Kaltura
Video Marketing
Comparison of Video Marketing features of Product A and Product B
JW Player
8.6
Ratings
14% above category average
Kaltura
7.5
Ratings
0% above category average
Support for advertisements
9.10 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Video SEO
8.10 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Lead generation
00 Ratings
5.70 Ratings
Video personalization
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
eCommerce
00 Ratings
5.70 Ratings
Integration to Marketing Automation
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Video Security
Comparison of Video Security features of Product A and Product B
JW Player
7.8
Ratings
13% below category average
Kaltura
8.3
Ratings
7% below category average
Video access controls
9.00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
User management
9.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Video link sharing
7.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
External video
6.00 Ratings
8.30 Ratings
Internal video
00 Ratings
8.70 Ratings
Video Player
Comparison of Video Player features of Product A and Product B
JW Player
7.0
Ratings
19% below category average
Kaltura
7.8
Ratings
8% below category average
Player customization
2.00 Ratings
8.30 Ratings
Embedded videos
6.00 Ratings
8.30 Ratings
Video quality / Bandwidth controls
10.00 Ratings
8.70 Ratings
Mobile compatibility
10.00 Ratings
5.70 Ratings
Video Analytics
Comparison of Video Analytics features of Product A and Product B
JW Player
1.0
Ratings
155% below category average
Kaltura
6.4
Ratings
20% below category average
Per viewer tracking
1.00 Ratings
6.40 Ratings
Per video tracking
1.00 Ratings
6.40 Ratings
Video analytics dashboard
1.00 Ratings
6.70 Ratings
A/B testing
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Streaming quality reports
00 Ratings
6.40 Ratings
Video Hosting, Management & Storage
Comparison of Video Hosting, Management & Storage features of Product A and Product B
JW Player
8.6
Ratings
1% below category average
Kaltura
8.1
Ratings
7% below category average
On-Demand video
6.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Live streaming
10.00 Ratings
7.70 Ratings
Video upload & format support
10.00 Ratings
8.30 Ratings
Video library / File management
7.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Video portal
10.00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Impact of streaming on network
00 Ratings
8.30 Ratings
Video Platform Integrations
Comparison of Video Platform Integrations features of Product A and Product B
JW Player
-
Ratings
Kaltura
7.3
Ratings
17% above category average
Integration to Salesforce.com
00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Integration to Marketo
00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Integration to Eloqua
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Integration to LMS
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Video Engagement
Comparison of Video Engagement features of Product A and Product B
I think they do a great job of converting a video into various formats (file/size) that will accommodate a variety of devices. From computer to phone to tablet, it streams really nice with little or no latency. I would really, really like to see an easy way to add clickable text and links to the video (in a similar fashion to how YouTube does it).
Kaltura and Mediaspace are well suited for any business that has a need for an easy to use video conversion software. We use the SaaS solution, but Kaltura is also open-sourced which means if you have the server resources available, you could get Kaltura up-and-running for a minimal cost or customize it to your hearts content. We have gone with the SaaS solution to minimize the amount of administration required as well as give us the benefit of getting the most-up-to-date version of the software. There are ways to monetize videos by adding ads and other things, but unfortunately I don't have much experience with these since we are a University. Kaltura is excellent from our University's perspective because it gives our campus a way to share their videos in a very easy to use package that basically "just works." If you're a small company or institution that doesn't need a lot of control over the back-end of a video solution, then there may be other, better alternatives that are free such as YouTube.
Just made the decision to renew given demonstrated improvements being made to the platform to expand compatibility for its player use on devices such as Apple TV, as well as improvements made recently to its JW Platform Dashboard
The choice to renew our subscription does not belong to us, though we are able to provide input. We are aware of competitive products who have matured in the past three years, and we are aware now of alternatives to conventional plugin usage (LTI).
Reliability and compatibility on a majority of platforms. Would have received a 10 except recent versions of browsers such as Firefox are now defaulting against Flash components and thus prompting approval from users BEFORE loading which is a HUGE obstacle to an effective user experience thus creating concerns by end-users unnecessarily and risking that they will NOT accept the prompts, thus leaving unable to view video content hosted using the JW Player. Assurances by JW support suggest they will resolve this, so we'll see...
Support is reasonable. I from time to time have made suggestions on improvements that would be nice to see (like the ability to have a clickable link within the video - that is easy to create, without tons of coding) and it seems as though I never see it happen or get much response to "suggestions" to upgrade the software. The good news, other than a few things as I mentioned above, overall, I don't have many "technical issues" in the platform, which is a good thing. On occasion, I have seen some "issues" with the delivery of the video, but it has been pretty scarce. So it is dependable.
The first line support agents seldom are able to diagnose or troubleshoot any problems that we have. These agents simply open support tickets in their system which are escalated to a foreign level 2 support agent which creates at least a day delay between reporting a problem and getting initial feedback. Any back-and-forth questions add at least another day delay.
One of the primary features promoted by JW Platform is its SEO definition. However, there did not seem to be a way to integrate that data to our platform if selected thus only leaving the benefits of that data to be established on the individual video page hosted by JW Platform, which isn't useful in the end to the client value we are trying to deliver for our VideoproFile.net solution
JW Player is the most widely used internet video player out there, so it was an easy choice for us to trust JW with our video content and delivery. What impressed me most was their hunger to improve and satisfy our business needs. Many of their competitors weren't nearly as interested in our bottom line as they were in their own
Panopto is a much cheaper option (based on a pay per view model) but the user experience is not nearly as good. The video portal UI is difficult to navigate and the recording feature requires downloading separate desktop software that differs greatly from PC to MAC. Inline quizzing features are far behind Kaltura. It does have stronger analytics tools but they are the type that are better exported to .csv and processed by an advanced Excel user. Vimeo Pro is a very cheap and solid option for a small program or business that is just starting out, but it isn't highly searchable, it doesn't support a large body of users and does not offer any type of online features. It isn't really much more than a repository but it is a bit nicer than using freeware such as YouTube.
Managing video content with the KMC has greatly reduced the amount of hours previously needed to manage.
User issues ie: uploading video, viewing video has been greatly reduced.
Increased user engagement with using video in LMS courses. We currently have 6,929 videos on our system. Last month , 2/1/14, 17,623 videos were viewed at least 75% of the way through.