Kaseya VSA vs. N-able N-central

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Kaseya VSA
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Kaseya Virtual System Administrator (VSA) is a cloud-based Remote Monitoring and Management software. VSA unifies the monitoring of system infrastructure and endpoints and is designed for use by IT teams and MSP’s. It offers a robust crowd-source automation scripts library, as well as antivirus and malware capabilities with real-time threat alerts.N/A
N-able N-central
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
MSPs and IT professionals use N-able™ N-central® to monitor and manage devices and complex networks remotely. N-central provides visibility and efficiency as the user's needs scale. N-central can help users: 1. Proactively monitor everything on a customer network—not just servers and workstations—and troubleshoot. 2. Stay on top of threats with features like MFA, antivirus, integrated endpoint detection and response, data backup, disk encryption, email protection,…N/A
Pricing
Kaseya VSAN-able N-central
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Kaseya VSAN-able N-central
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Kaseya VSAN-able N-central
Considered Both Products
Kaseya VSA
Chose Kaseya VSA
Kaseya VSA compares well to other solutions available. I think some of the other solutions so have some small areas which are better than Kaseya VSA, however as an overall product, Kaseya VSA seems most complete. I'd like to see them continuing to evolve the product as it …
Chose Kaseya VSA
While Atera and NinjaRMM are both solid products, they seemed to be more oriented to MSPs which we aren't. There were more features associated with costs per user/system, etc. that we would never utilize.
Chose Kaseya VSA
We looked at several options besides Kaseya in the beginning of our research process. We preferred the layout, support, and overall feature rich platform of Kaseya to some of their competitors. We also liked the ability to grow with Kaseya as needed and the ability to add …
Chose Kaseya VSA
What's Up Gold is more of a monitoring application and very good at that, but doesn't have the management tools that VSA provides. It requires additional applications and you lose the "single pane of glass" concept.

ConnectWise, at the time we looked at the product, did not have …
Chose Kaseya VSA
We moved away from NinjaRMM for support of PowerShell scripting and APIs. Overall, the experience with NinjaRMM, though limited in features, was tenfold better than our experience with VSA.

We have been desiring strongly to move away from VSA to N-Central (having been provided a …
Chose Kaseya VSA
We used to use Netop for many years prior to Kaseya. The main reason that we switched was because with staff working from home we needed a cloud based solution and Netop required gateway servers or PIN servers to be configured in order to be able to access those staff while at …
Chose Kaseya VSA
Kaseya is the worst remote desktop software I have ever used. I could never understand why I constantly was unable to connect to our remote desktops. Not being able to do my work, the lackluster customer service, and the constant complaints from my workers is the reason why we …
Chose Kaseya VSA
To me, once past the learning curve, it's much easier to use than ConnectWise. It's not something I have to constantly baby.
Chose Kaseya VSA
ConnectWise didn't offer all of the features that we required and was more expensive than VSA.
Chose Kaseya VSA
Kaseya is cheaper compared to Continuum RMM solutions, and also has a better feature set of tools. The reporting has more customization than what continuum offers.
Chose Kaseya VSA
I think that one of the best features Kaseya has over the other tools I mentioned is more maturity and expertise in the area, so you have a good support and good know-how in the network. It also works in most use environments.
Chose Kaseya VSA
We have tried many other systems: Pulseway, Ninja RMM, Solarwinds and none of these other systems comes close to the ability of Kaseya VSA.
Chose Kaseya VSA
Automate is by far more customizable and affordable, a lot of our pain points in Kaseya are addressed with Automate. In our case, we have used Kaseya since 2012-2013 and have started migrating our customers to Automate in the past year.
Chose Kaseya VSA
VSA is easily on par with SolarWinds N-Central but ConnectWise Automate is the best tool out there for RMM. Automate shares some of the clunky interface that VSA has, but it is extremely fast and reliable. N-Central has the best organization of the three, it is very easy to …
Chose Kaseya VSA
The way LabTech integrates with ScreenConnect and Teamviewer is just SO much better than Kaseya.
I feel like Kaseya is a bit more intuitive though as opposed to Labtech that you should probably get some real training for.
Scripting in LabTech is more reliable. I've never had a …
Chose Kaseya VSA
Both SolarWinds & Autotask appears to have a better user community, but they have the same issue with out of the box scripts (non-existent). With Kaseya, I can write everything in PowerShell, dos, vb, java, and then have Kaseya execute across applicable devices. In fairness, …
Chose Kaseya VSA
It has been a long time since I tested competitors so it would not be fair for me to compare existing version of Kaseya with older versions of the products I have tested int he past. It is very hard to change and I am very Happy with Kaseya therefor no intentions of testing …
Chose Kaseya VSA
There are other products that do some of what Kaseya does, but I've not personally worked with another product that does everything Kaseya does. Sure there are plenty of remote control products, but products that do as much as Kaseya are few and far between. Hard to go wrong …
Chose Kaseya VSA
They're both complicated to get the incremental value out of the tools.
Chose Kaseya VSA
For the price point and resources we get with Kaseya IT Center it is a tour de force.
Chose Kaseya VSA
We decided to go with Kaseya over LabTech back in 2012 because the product was far more advanced. I don't know how LabTech stacks up now.
Chose Kaseya VSA
Nothing for the user to install or a website to log into. It's already running on the machine. It's by far the better product.
Chose Kaseya VSA
Kaseya is not as good as Labtech but gives you great bang for your buck. I would recommend it to anyone trying to achieve a proactive approach to network monitoring.
N-able N-central
Chose N-able N-central
Most advanced, and other technicians in the business already used it before. NinjaOne was a close competitor, but lacked some features that we ideally need. ITarian was too basic but was MUCH cheaper. For a startup MSP, it would be much more attractive. Splashtop was just for …
Chose N-able N-central
Tried another MSP software provider however the cost was not justified.
Chose N-able N-central
I selected N-able N-central as I liked the idea of easy-to-work with pricing that integrates with other PSAs (specifically Connectwise PSA aka Connectwise Manage). I did not succeed with that. I'd use any of the other tools instead. The integration is problematic as the default …
Chose N-able N-central
Our version of SolarWinds was old and running on old hardware, but it was way easier to setup and do things with. It did not do everything N-able does such as patch management, or at least we didn't have a module to do so if one existed. However it definitely seemed easier to …
Chose N-able N-central
In regards to the above, they are more concentrated on Cybersecurity and AV management whereas N-able N-central covers these areas but has the added advantage of IT management, whereby the IT environment can be managed directly from N-able N-central
Chose N-able N-central
N-able N-central was cheaper than Connectwise RMM as the poor NOC monitoring inflated costs but was not useful. Kaseya VSA was terrible contracts and poor product all around.
Chose N-able N-central
NinjaOne has been a breath of fresh air. Moving away from N-Able to NinjaOne has been the best decision we've made in this department.
Highly recommend.
Chose N-able N-central
In my eyes, if I could I would have switched to automate, but this is a distant second or third.
Chose N-able N-central
N-Central has automation manager, which allows you to automate multiple tasks, thereby saving time and effort through Automated patching. AV and Backups are built into the system, and can be deployed by checking a box. It's easy to update and keep secure. File transfer and …
Chose N-able N-central
Solarwinds seemed less complicated and less expensive and would have the least impact on our staff as far as training and setup time.
Chose N-able N-central
I feel it's much more robust then Kaseya which is the only other RMM solution I have tried. I like the remote support and the fact that in N-central I can deploy patches at the click of a button.
Chose N-able N-central
It's much pricier than other remote support fools.
Chose N-able N-central
SolarWinds N-central is on the more unique side of tools because it can do so many things, and do most of them quite well. For patching, it is much easier to use than SCCM. In terms of monitoring, it is not great out of the box and requires tweaking to take full advantage. …
Chose N-able N-central
All three systems integrate with Connectwise Manage. All systems have integration to active directory. Automation does configuration deployment better. Ninja is a SaaS, N-central is a Saas, whereas Automate is on-premise. Automate is more scalable. Pricing and seat deployment …
Chose N-able N-central
Automate has the best scripting engine. There is no conversation there, the scripting is taken to another level. N-central and VSA both have the ability to run scripts, but Automate runs away with it. Automate also has the best remote access tool. VSA and N-central remote …
Chose N-able N-central
With Bomgar there are codes and/or a website that the user has to login to before we can connect remotely. N-central allows us to click on the machine and log in. We can set it to prompt the user to accept the connection, or on some computers, we can just log right into it.
Chose N-able N-central
We chose SolarWinds N-Central because of the integration with ConnectWise Manage, it allows us to automatically create tickets and helps us be more efficient. We really liked the engineers that were able to coach us in migrating from our old system and teach us all the best …
Chose N-able N-central
N-Central has all of the features of previous software I have used all rolled into one package. I can push software and check anything and everything about every machine on our network in one place now instead of multiple interfaces and programs. N-Central saves us time and …
Chose N-able N-central
Overall, for the Average MSP, none of the RMM solutions is going to be perfect, they will all have their strengths and weaknesses and N-Able is no exception. It is a great solution if you are looking for something that is not super cryptic to use and want something relatively …
Chose N-able N-central
Since I came in to manage the product, we have only tested one other product. The main reason for not switching was that it would take a considerable amount of time and resources to convert everything to a new service. Additionally N-able's interface, while it does have much …
Features
Kaseya VSAN-able N-central
Application Performance Management
Comparison of Application Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Kaseya VSA
7.5
Ratings
2% above category average
N-able N-central
-
Ratings
Virtualization monitoring8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
IT Asset Discovery7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Monitoring Tasks
Comparison of Monitoring Tasks features of Product A and Product B
Kaseya VSA
6.7
Ratings
10% below category average
N-able N-central
7.4
Ratings
0% below category average
Remote monitoring9.00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Network device monitoring8.00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Activity Monitoring8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Management Tasks
Comparison of Management Tasks features of Product A and Product B
Kaseya VSA
7.5
Ratings
1% above category average
N-able N-central
9.0
Ratings
19% above category average
Patch Management8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Policy-based automation9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Remote Access
Comparison of Remote Access features of Product A and Product B
Kaseya VSA
6.8
Ratings
0% above category average
N-able N-central
-
Ratings
Attended device access8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Unattended device access8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Virtual device access9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple-display support1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple concurrent sessions8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Kaseya VSAN-able N-central
Small Businesses
Panda Systems Management
Panda Systems Management
Score 9.8 out of 10
Panda Systems Management
Panda Systems Management
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
TeamViewer
TeamViewer
Score 8.5 out of 10
TeamViewer
TeamViewer
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Kaseya VSAN-able N-central
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.5
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Kaseya VSAN-able N-central
Likelihood to Recommend
This package is well suited for businesses of any size that needs a method of connecting to systems on or off the network. This is one of the few packages that doesn't require the end user to provide permission before allowing the techs to connect which is what my agency needed as we have a majority of our systems are used by "general public" that walk in our doors and if they are doing something that they are not supposed to it would be unlikely that they would grant permission for us to access the systems.
Read full review
In my opinion, N-able N-central is a good "learn your lesson and move onto something better" tool. I've used many RMM tools over the years and I feel that this one is slow, does a terrible job with reporting, alerting, monitoring, software deployments, etc. The ability to turn on services like AV, backup, etc easily is cute, but you're not going to be able to use your own tools with this easily. In my experience, if you do turn those tools on for testing during the trial, you'll be charged later (despite it being a trial). They also turn off your ability to monitor these increased costs or to turn them off yourself. As a company, I found that they were impossible to work with. The sales team is right there if you want to buy something - but if you need anything other than to buy something, in my experience, they take days or weeks to navigate. I found that they are not a terribly ethical company and are more concerned with making a few dollars than creating a partnerships with MSPs. I can see value is in the advertised price of $99 for a hundred endpoints. However, you need to remember to not trial any other tools (like AV, backup, etc).
Read full review
Pros
  • Scripting - Very powerful scripting engine that allows us to update/install applications and maintain PC's and Servers.
  • Policy Management - Globally configured policies allowing us to make changes to thousands of PC's quickly.
  • Monitoring - Monitoring engine allows us to Proactively respond to alerts quickly minimizing downtime significantly.
  • Patch Management - This module requires minimal effort to manage and maintain.
Read full review
  • Robust patch management: it is easy to set up patching groups via tags, and configures patch management profiles and maintenance windows.
  • Remote Control: as long as the agent checks in, it is very quick and easy to take control of an endpoint, either in a separate session (RDP, kick the current user out), or to join the existing session of the current user, to provide desktop support or collaborate remotely.
Read full review
Cons
  • The only area I can see where a lot of room for improvement can be made is in scripting of Agent procedures. Making operations more modular and able to be assembled by technicians who might not be strong in a scripting environment would be helpful. In the mean time, Kaseya has an entire site and a whole team of developers who write Agent procedures for common tasks and make them available for free to all Kaseya VSA customers.
Read full review
  • Expensive software
  • The support team are terrible
  • Sales team will promise the world to get you over the line
  • Subscription management is tedious
  • Old software with very little development and the support team will not provide any further information on this - no roadmap
  • Integrations galore - but none of them are effective
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Excellent product with easy learning curve
Read full review
Overall we have liked our solar winds experience, however, as our company has grown to support larger enterprises, this product does not have the functionality that our teams need in order to fully support them. The lack of granularity with backups and lack of ability to support nutanix environments is slowly drawing us into the use of other tools.
Read full review
Usability
I think this is a solid tool for enterprise IT, however it would be higher if Kaseya VSA addresses the areas raised around recent stability, their support team, multiple session & screen support etc. It does do it's main job and allows an easy way for IT to operate and is mostly fine.
Read full review
The user interface is fairly straight forward, with logic groupings for objects. I did not deploy this software, but am one of the daily administrators. Once you get the correct agent package (Which can be a challenge) the integration into AD is not bad. The UI could be more customized, but that may have been a design choice.
Read full review
Support Rating
It was lots of back and forth email communication whenever I tried to solve my connection issues. I would send them detailed logs of the date, time, computer, and more of when I was experiencing connection issues. All I would get is an email back a few days later saying that they didn't find an issue in the service
Read full review
Every time we have reached out to SolarWinds they are quick to respond, even offering support chat 24/7. Their support team is great and works with you to find solutions to issues. They have taken items we had issues with before and used those to create updates so that the issue is handled better in the future.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Make sure if you your using a vm you follow the instructions for provisioning to the letter or it will be starting from square one
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We moved away from NinjaRMM for support of PowerShell scripting and APIs. Overall, the experience with NinjaRMM, though limited in features, was tenfold better than our experience with VSA. We have been desiring strongly to move away from VSA to N-Central (having been provided a full demo that we installed on our cloud infrastructure) but have been unable to do so due to Kaseya's draconian contract policies. It's important to note that NinjaRMM was allowing us to go month-to-month and switching to Kaseya VSA was one of the worst business decisions I ever made. It's equally important to note that, if you are considering Kaseya VSA, you will be locked into a 3-year contract that is nearly impossible to escape from once the documents are signed. SolarWinds N-central only requires a 1-year contract and then has month-to-month billing available. I can provide no good reason for anyone to consider Kaseya VSA when there are dozens of better systems out there to choose from.
Read full review
Most advanced, and other technicians in the business already used it before. NinjaOne was a close competitor, but lacked some features that we ideally need. ITarian was too basic but was MUCH cheaper. For a startup MSP, it would be much more attractive. Splashtop was just for remote connections, which we used for some time before realizing full RMMs were a better fit for our requirements.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It has increased the efficiency of operational tasks for our technicians
  • It has change the speed at which we are able to deploy updates and software patches
  • It caused us to spend additional money on more security tools due to concern from breaches
Read full review
  • The product definitely increases productivity. Technicians can spend a few seconds to take care of remote tasks with a few clicks as opposed to minutes to get a user to start a remote control session, or worse, going on site to work on a piece of equipment.
  • The packaging of the features makes selling and pricing the product fairly straight-forward and convenient. This saves our sales team time from trying to work with add-ons when pricing our services - the product makes it easy to just have an "all you can eat" package at a set price.
  • When something goes wrong with the product, our business and our customers suffer. If for example, a bug causes all managed computers to reboot, our customers call in, resulting in our technicians being booked solid doing damage control. This also causes loss of trust with our customers - we can't simply blame the product, the customer trusts us to provide them a service and if the product fails, we fail.
Read full review
ScreenShots

N-able N-central Screenshots

Screenshot of N-able N-central DashboardScreenshot of Remote desktop access with Take Control