Kasm Workspaces vs. OCI Virtual Desktop

Kasm Workspaces is a good fit for when you need to provide home-based workers access to corporate information or application, but you don't want to provide full network access through a VPN connection. It works well for when you want to ensure that data cannot be taken out of the network or you want to allow non-company devices to be used to access internal resources.

For large and mid-sized organizations utilizing massive virtual desktop deployments, Oracle VDI offers great value. It supports a wide range of operating systems like Linux, Solaris, Windows etc.

Incentivized

• Access from the web browser without having to install an agent or a VPN.
• Can be used on personal devices since the data is not stored on the device.
• No risk of data loss since the information never leaves the company network.

• Ease of Manageability. Accessing and managing multiple virtualized desktop environments is pretty straightforward.
• Great Options for Keeping Track of Logins. Detailed reports of who has been logging into which environment are easy to configure.
• File Systems Can Be Shared. You can set multiple desktop environments to be able to share data on the same file system.

Incentivized

• Remote workers had to be familiarized with the browser-in-browser for web applications.

• In our use of Oracle VDI, we have found there is a significant lag time when using the desktop environments through it, rather than the standalone virtual desktops.
• Real time reporting and statistics can be improved as well.

Incentivized

From the end user's perspective the usability is not impacted at all.

Incentivized

The easiest way to describe the performance is like this - when it is working, it works almost flawlessly. When it starts freezing, your day is going to get very interesting very quickly. As I have stated earlier, I used it for one purpose, and it did what I needed it to most of the time, but I did have issues with it.

Incentivized

The Kasm support team is always responsive to our questions. They interact with us directly, even as a small customer. They also notify us of software updates and check in on our usage of the software.

Kasm is alot more cost effective than Citrix or VMWare. We wanted an on-premise solution to provide remote access to our internal network resources. The Citrix and VMware solutions require significantly more hardware to run, since Kasm runs on a Linux server as containers and each of the images run as a small container. The licenses were significantly less expensive for Kasm too.

VMware Horizon does everything that Oracle VDI is capable of doing and offers many more features, and unlike Oracle VDI, it is still receiving constant updates. Oracle VDI was a great solution for enterprise-level management of virtualized desktop when it was getting updates, but now that it won't be getting any, I would put it in the "outdated technology" category.

Incentivized

• Increased productivity by enabling a remote workforce.
• Allows work from any location or any device.

• When I used it full-time it worked for what I needed it - positive.
• When it crashed, it costed me in time to wait to get it back up - negative.
• Took up less space than using live machines - positive.

Incentivized