Kaspersky Endpoint Security vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Kaspersky Endpoint Security

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Kaspersky Endpoint Security	Score 7.8 out of 10	N/A	Kaspersky Small Office Security (formerly Kaspersky Work Space Security) is antivirus / endpoint security software from Russian company Kaspersky.	$29.99 per month
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security	Score 7.7 out of 10	N/A	The Trend Vision One Endpoint Security platform provides antivirus and malware detection, and endpoint visibility. The product suite can be extended with associated applications that cover mobile endpoint protection, endpoint encryption, as well as network and server vulnerability protection.	$26.99 12 month subscription

Pricing

Kaspersky Endpoint Security

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Editions & Modules

Essential Suite: $29.99
per month
Advanced Suite: $39.99
per month
Premium Suite: $44.99
per month

Trend Micro Vision One Endpoint Security Core - subscription license renewal - 1 device: $26.99
12 month subscription
Trend Micro Vision One - License - 51-250 Users - New Subscription: $35.99
12 month subscription
Trend Micro Vision One Endpoint Security Pro - subscription license - 1 device: $178.99
12 month subscription

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Kaspersky Endpoint Security	Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Kaspersky Endpoint Security	Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
Considered Both Products	Kaspersky Endpoint Security Verified User Anonymous Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cisco is very complicated to use in my opinion and this leads to some operational doubts when you have to manage sensitive and critical operations. with Kaspersky there's more trust perception and a feeling that everything is going the right way and as expected. Cisco AMP can't … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security Other cybersecurity products we've tested only detect a few malware. They are not cost-effective as they have separate licenses for other features. Other vendors no longer support the old version of the OS. This is very important to us as we still have legacy OS in place. To … Incentivized Helpful? ST Starling Trinidad IT Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security Offers equal or greater protection against current threats, stays updated. Its license is cheaper than the competition (i.e. EPDR) and financiers really like this. Incentivized Helpful? SEGUNDO GONZALEZ GONZALEZ CIO (Chief Information Officer) Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security Kaspersky Endpoint Security has less impact on computer memory and processing. On the other hand, I think the solution is much more advanced and more powerful overall. Both solutions have a central management console, but Kaspersky's solution has better usability and provides … Incentivized Helpful? Hunter Bonner Technology Consultant Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security In terms of management, it it much more difficult to cloud manage Kaspersky versus Webroot. Also, as stated before, much easier to make exceptions to virus definitions and scanning. Incentivized Helpful? BS Benedetto Schiavone AD Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security More performing and better protection. Incentivized Helpful? VK vinoth kumar Sr system administrator Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security one of the best antivirus software I have used with a much friendly interface and is easy to manage as compared to other security products. As an admin, We have managed many security tasks in an organization. It does come in handy for such tasks without any hassle. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security Kaspersky was chosen over other competitors for it's benefits. As Kaspersky is a fully fledge solution for encryption, patch management, OS deployment, Device control, web control, application whitelisting and endpoint protection. Incentivized Helpful? Annie Kramer Senior Business Analyst Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security There are lots of reasons for choosing this endpoint security system. It is a very efficient tool in terms of identifying viruses. The biggest benefit is that it always keeps me away from opening harmful or suspicious sites. This is the most affordable security product. Incentivized Helpful? Karen Thompson Systems Analyst Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security I've used the cloud version of CarbonBlack and Bitdefender. They both say they automatically scan files as soon as they appear on your computer. The user/administrator is left to trust that the technology works. With Bitdefender, it at least allows an on-demand scan, but it … Incentivized Helpful? Emir Omeragić Customer Support Expert Associate Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security Fairly similar, but Kaspersky is more Cloud centric, I would say better for Remote workers. Price is better with yearly subscriptions. Incentivized Helpful? AW Amanda Wiens Analista de Suporte Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security Kaspersky Endpoint Security was chosen because it has very high reliability and an easy to use graphical interface. It also has excellent technical support, and in evaluations, it met all the technical requirements that the management needed. The software protects against the … Incentivized Helpful? JJ Junie Johwa Senior Infrastructure Analyst Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security Symantec Endpoint Protection Incentivized Helpful? Kevin Staley MIS Administrator Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security At the time, we thought its centralized management and highly-rated anti-virus detection capabilities stood out above the other solutions we reviewed. Incentivized Helpful? David Judice IT Director Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security The Central Security Center for the Symantec Endpoint Protection product that was previously being used was horrible and the client programs were a huge drain on system resources. The workstation resources were overloaded when this program was running and rendered the … Incentivized Helpful? Alex Waitkus, CISSP-ISSAP, OSCP Security Architect Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security Kaspersky is a leader in endpoint protection, but its ties to potential adversaries are unsettling. Kaspersky has a great threat research team and quickly identifies malicious software and its signature. Its web-based protection is also top notch. This is a great product but as … Incentivized Helpful? Brandon Pelinka Senior Systems Engineer Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security It is one of the best anti-virus products that I have used. Much more friendly user interface. It is way easier to implement and install. It is also way easier to manage through the MMC. The console is Microsoft like and very intuitive to any system admin who has run consoles … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security Kaspersky adds another layered approach to defense that continues to protect and provide ongoing operations. The suite of products within the solution continue to provide solid proactive threat detection and prevention actions, centralized enterprise controls make management … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security I have not used a competitor of Kaspersky's. Incentivized Helpful? Ian Raloff Senior IT Systems Administrator Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security System Center is more robust than Kaspersky Security Center. They both offer a single pane of glass for remote management of Endpoints (at the Advanced level for Kaspersky). Kaspersky does an excellent job of providing 3rd party applications in packages that can be downloaded … Incentivized Helpful? Eric Gerber IDS Specialist Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security I tried both Avast and Avira and the annoying pop ups to upgrade and being locked behind a paywall made buying Kaspersky a no brainer, especially when I have seen it first hand protect our data. The interface for all 3 was lacking in some sort of way but the Kaspersky UI was … Incentivized Helpful? Erik Ross IT Help Desk Administrator Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security I used Norton for almost 10 years, always reliable and never had a big problem with the features or offerings. Kaspersky won me over with its speed, mobility and much more reliable nature. Norton had a nasty habit of uninstalling programs it didn't want, even though they were … Incentivized Helpful? Bruce Emmerling IT Manager Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security Kaspersky Endpoint Security often comes up on top of other competitor products for a variety of reasons. These include overall speed, easy to user interface, lower costs for implementation, and easy to manage features. It has a great security research department to deal with … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security We looked at other solutions and chose Kaspersky over the other software out there as the price point on a multiyear contract was aggressive and the software running on the computers as the agent was thin and didn't use up much system resources. We also like that Kasperksy has … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security Kaspersky Work Space Security is little bit [better] than Microsoft Forefont. Better software. Incentivized Helpful?	Trend Vision One Endpoint Security JJ Justin Johnson Information Technology Director Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Honestly they are fairly similar in the nature. The biggest benefit to us as an organization was the cost and prior knowledge of the product. Both products offer a great solution so it just comes down to personal preference and cost. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Another organization was using this software and Trend micro is widely used now a days and remote support is a positive thing. Also policy and updates are always on time delivered by the vendor. Online many software were compared by SME. Incentivized Helpful? ST Starling Trinidad IT Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security For me, Trend Micro Apex One with its low performance is the best option at the time to buy a solution like this, with its flexibility through on-premises or saas deployment options you can choose the option that best fix to you, has an advanced automated threat detection and … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security None. Incentivized Helpful? BY Brady Yeoman Regional IT Manager Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Trend Micro is a company headquartered in the USA and provides a high-quality product with minimal impact of resources on the computers. Leaving both IT and endpoint users happy. Incentivized Helpful? SJ Shannon Johnson System Engineer Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Trend Micro Apex One (formerly OfficeScan), to me, is head and shoulders above both of those products. You could take the best parts of both products combined and Trend Micro Apex One (formerly OfficeScan) is still so much more reliable, easier to manage, and trustworthy than … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security When comparing trend micro apex one to symantec endpoint protection there is a definite and stark difference. Symantec cannot find or stop viruses but it has an easy to use agent upgrade management system. On the other hand Trend micro seems to find and stop numerous viruses … Incentivized Helpful? Nathan Roberts Director, Management Information Systems Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security I have evaluated several endpoint security products over the years, but Trend Micro consistently lands in the Gartner's magic quadrant of best companies in this space, reviews well, and, most tellingly, I have had great success with their products. Every iteration brings … Incentivized Helpful? David Schwartz IT Director Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Apex One beats on non-Trend Micro product by leaps and bounds, not just on price but overall functionality. When comparing it to the other Trend Micro products, it really comes down to what features you're looking for and what sort of devices you need to have covered. Either … Incentivized Helpful? LL Lee Ludlum IT Technical Support Specialist Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Trend Micro Deep Security Smart Check Incentivized Helpful? Jorge Flores VIP Support Analyst Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security We have chosen Trend Micro due to the availability to migrate our physical server to the cloud. It has reduced the maintenance cost of the data center and offers the same, if not more, protection then we used to have. Also, the provider that sold us Trend Micro offers more … Incentivized Helpful? Breanna Walsemann Marketing and Advertising Consultant Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security I believe Trend Micro is a much better solution than Norton. Norton allows more spam to come through whereas Trend Micro does a better job of preventing such things. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Trend micro has been superior compared to McAfee endpoint antivirus. It is very intuitive on what to block and what to allow. Incentivized Helpful? Tom Parker Remote Facilities Systems Support Analyst Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security The cost is lower and less resources to run Trend. Incentivized Helpful? Nathan Venno IT Manager Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security I would never deploy Trend Micro on any scale to anyone ever. I work in an SMB, don't have much exposure or Internet traffic (other than the usual stuff). I just need something that will adequately protect my users without being intrusive or burdensome to run and operate. I … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security McAfee can be confusing and I do not like the licensing model. AVG is good for home use but not the best for business. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security I chose Trend Micro instead of Kaspersky Work space Security because of the price. However, Kaspersky is in a much better place in the AntiVirus comparatives like: https://www.av-comparatives.org Incentivized Helpful? Ratulsnigdha Saha Network/Systems Engineer Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security The installation is very straight forward from infrastructure perspective and it's easy to maintain the product. It's easy for users to use the agent and run frequent scans on the machine as needed. It does have some very high end features if time is used to explore them, it … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security I really liked the offerings from GFI Vipre in terms of feature set and simplicity, as well as the cloud management for all clients. Another plus was the patch management feature that applied to "3rd-party" applications. I ended up staying with Trend Micro OfficeScan because … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Mostly it was an ease of deployment. At the time it had the best deployment package. Incentivized Helpful? Joe Barnett Director of Technology and Information Services Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Trend Micro stacks up very well from a technology standpoint. Pricing is higher than other competitors. Incentivized Helpful? Aaron Myers Senior Business Systems Analyst Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Both Kaspersky and Symantec were less than ideal solutions that caused more problems than they fixed. They were very difficult to manage and, while fully featured, caused compatibility issues and CPU spikes that are non-existent with Trend. Incentivized Helpful?

Features

Kaspersky Endpoint Security

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Endpoint Security

Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
	Kaspersky Endpoint Security 8.3 Ratings 3% below category average	Trend Vision One Endpoint Security 8.1 Ratings 6% below category average
Anti-Exploit Technology	9.00 Ratings	7.00 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)	8.00 Ratings	9.00 Ratings
Centralized Management	8.00 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support	7.00 Ratings	8.00 Ratings
Infection Remediation	8.00 Ratings	7.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management	9.00 Ratings	7.00 Ratings
Malware Detection	9.00 Ratings	9.00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Kaspersky Endpoint Security	Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
Small Businesses	ThreatLocker Score 9.5 out of 10	ThreatLocker Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score 9.1 out of 10	BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises	BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management Score 9.8 out of 10	BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management Score 9.8 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Kaspersky Endpoint Security	Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
Likelihood to Recommend	9.0 (0 ratings)	8.0 (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	10.0 (0 ratings)	8.0 (0 ratings)
Usability	7.0 (0 ratings)	9.0 (0 ratings)
Availability	10.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Performance	10.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	8.5 (0 ratings)	8.0 (0 ratings)
Implementation Rating	9.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Product Scalability	10.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Kaspersky Endpoint Security	Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
Likelihood to Recommend	Anytime you are managing multiple servers and workstations on a network, having a good Security Center to assist with that management is critical. Kaspersky Security Center provides that and gives the administrator the tools and reports necessary to properly manage and monitor these systems across a network. This is a VERY useful tool and it makes my job much easier. Incentivized David Judice IT Director Read full review	I think Trend is well suited for businesses that need an all-in-one malware/antivirus/EDR solution. It works well and runs smoothly in the background not hindering the users. Our only issue with it is the use of it and secure browsers for state testing. The EDR wants to automatically blocked the use of secure browsers setup by the state. Incentivized JJ Justin Johnson Information Technology Director Read full review
Pros	Potential threat identification and quarantining is immediate and very reliable. Monitoring system updates, statistics, hardware status, and connectivity issues for all systems on the network. Installation and registration, either remotely or in person, is a breeze, usually taking about 10-15 minutes, and with step by step confirmations. The organizational hierarchy, as well as the abilities listed in the hierarchy are extremely user friendly and easy to use for novices and pros alike. Incentivized Erik Ross IT Help Desk Administrator Read full review	End point implementation: the roll-out of Trend Micro was extremely easy! Server/Device policies: creating both endpoint and server device policies is something we were looking for in a system, since we have a variety of both endpoints with users, as well as several unattended servers needing specific limitations. License Management: removing Trend Micro from machines before destruction or retirement is done in a pinch. There's no struggling to free up an unused license Incentivized David Schwartz IT Director Read full review
Cons	The PC imaging tools are difficult to set up and use Device Encryption tools are getting better, but are difficult to manage. The policies are powerful, but could be broken up. More help can be provided in what the policy element does within the policy setup Incentivized Ian Raloff Senior IT Systems Administrator Read full review	Only thing I would have to say that's negative is the reporting aspect. Basic reporting is good but still lacks some details. This is a problem with many of the software vendors I have encountered in the past as well. Reporting is still much better than most. Incentivized SJ Shannon Johnson System Engineer Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	The product is stable and accurate in detecting security threats. There are very few or no false positives in detecting security threats or unusual behavior and has very sharp heuristics. The product does the job very well including saving us money in getting 3rd party patch management tools as the business is already using Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager which is Microsoft product specific and the product patches these third party products e.g Adobe Flash Player Incentivized JJ Junie Johwa Senior Infrastructure Analyst Read full review	It is very easy to stick with a vendor year after year, and it is also easy to see the faults in a product and want to change. This is the first time I have renewed with an antiviurs provider as others have been less than ideal and caused issues where there were none before, so while it isn't perfect, it is the best of the bunch currently and I am hopeful that it will continue to improve in future versions. Incentivized Aaron Myers Senior Business Systems Analyst Read full review
Usability	I will give Kaspersky a score of 9 out of 10 for scalability, as it allows businesses to easily expand their security infrastructure. This means it won't cost them a lot to add further protection and security. It won't also require them to purchase other hardware and services for their required protection. Verified User Anonymous Read full review	The dashboard is user-friendly and allows for an IT admin to quickly deploy the software. The users do not even notice the program running in the background. From the dashboard the IT department can monitor all the workstations for issues and maintain good health of the network. Incentivized JJ Justin Johnson Information Technology Director Read full review
Reliability and Availability	I've used the on-premise server. I've only experienced one time that we couldn't open the console, and that was a server issue. It seems to be a dependable solution. It's there, and it's stable. Incentivized Karen Thompson Systems Analyst Read full review	No answers on this topic
Performance	Users don't notice any slowdown with the antivirus running on their systems. There have been issues when the systems have missed a scheduled scan, and it was checked to run at [a] first available time, they will start a full scan at startup. This has caused some lag. Normally there are also some issues with the workstation, but it is something to note. Incentivized Karen Thompson Systems Analyst Read full review	No answers on this topic
Support Rating	I give the maximum grade because we have no complaints; we never had any failure, serious error, and serious threat to the company. All of its features work very well. The great advantage of having a product supported by an industry-leading security company is that regularly updated security protocols will protect the system against all emerging threats. Incentivized AW Amanda Wiens Analista de Suporte Read full review	It has been difficult at sometimes, the support people at one point told me that they couldn't tell me information about OfficeScan because it was knowledge that was passed down from engineer to engineer. The issue was that if you used the msi for the install any further installs would require the msi to have the same exact name or else the install fails and corrupts the install. This information is not listed anywhere on trends website. Support kept trying to get me to use the exe for installs instead, but we use SCCM and msi's work better. We had to write a script to come up with a solution so that we could uninstall the software and install the new software. Trend did provide the technical expertise to help with the script and had us work with one of the developers in order to resolve that issue. So they did fix their screw up but it took a while and several complaints. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Implementation Rating	Make sure to provide awareness campaigns on changes that will be implemented and WHY the business is doing it and the benefits reaped. Benefits reaped is very important for the justification of why things have to change and emphasizing the importance of security. This will reduce user disgruntlement and total bitterness on use of their workstation or laptop Incentivized JJ Junie Johwa Senior Infrastructure Analyst Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	I've used the cloud version of CarbonBlack and Bitdefender. They both say they automatically scan files as soon as they appear on your computer. The user/administrator is left to trust that the technology works. With Bitdefender, it at least allows an on-demand scan, but it still never reports to the user if the file was clean. Kaspersky automatically scans and notifies the user that it has been scanned AND the results of the scan. In IT we know we can't always trust the technology to perform as designed. I NEED confirmation to feel at ease. Kaspersky makes it easy to run an on-demand scan of a workstation if there is suspicion of an infection. Another thing is that I have not [seen] in Bitdefender, and I know CarbonBlack does not provide inventory information for the administrators like Kasperky. Kaspersky gives detailed information about the systems it scan and lists every software installed. You can even filter and search for specific installations in your network through the Kaspersky Server Center (KSC). It helps know what licenses are used and where. Incentivized Karen Thompson Systems Analyst Read full review	When comparing trend micro apex one to Symantec Endpoint Protection there is a definite and stark difference. Symantec cannot find or stop viruses but it has an easy to use agent upgrade management system. On the other hand Trend micro seems to find and stop numerous viruses including things that are not viruses. And the upgrading used to be an issue but it is supposed to be better now, in apex one Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Scalability	You can create groups and create different policies for each group. You can customize many parts of the software before it is deployed. You can create different tasks and schedules based on the groups. It is customizable. Incentivized Karen Thompson Systems Analyst Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	It reduced the incidents of infections and so reduced the efforts needed by the IT department to mitigate problems. It made it difficult to manage the security of our growing mobile user base due to infrequent contact with our on-premise management server. Incentivized Kevin Staley MIS Administrator Read full review	Since the product is a full suite of protection rolled into a single product, we've seen ROI through cost reduction and simplified management. And while we haven't measured performance, one would logically assume that systems will perform better with a single product installed vs several. While we haven't measured performance, one would logically assume that systems will perform better with a single product installed vs several. Incentivized Nathan Roberts Director, Management Information Systems Read full review
ScreenShots		Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Screenshots