KeldairHR vs. Lever

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
KeldairHR
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Hyrell is a cloud-based applicant tracking system. Its capabilities include batch or mass communication with potential candidates via multiple channels like email, social recruiting, and job boards, employee screening and testing, resume parsing, data management, and analytics.
$299
per month with an annual agreement
Lever
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Lever is a Talent Acquisition Suite designed to help talent teams to reach their hiring goals and to connect companies with top talent. Lever provides ATS and applicant CRM capabilities, in LeverTRM. The Lever Hire and Lever Nurture features allow leaders to grow their people pipeline, build long-lasting relationships, and source the right people. Lever Analytics provides customized reports with data visualization, see offers completed and interview feedback, and it informs strategic decisions…N/A
Pricing
KeldairHRLever
Editions & Modules
Up to 5 Open Jobs
$299
per month with an annual agreement
Up to 10 Open Jobs
$499
per month with an annual agreement
Up to 20 Open Jobs
$799
per month with an annual agreement
Up to 30 Open Jobs
$1049
per month with an annual agreement
More then 30 Open Jobs
Contact Company
per month with an annual agreement
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
KeldairHRLever
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsPay for the number of open positions you plan to have and you get unlimited users, all the core features, unlimited applicants, and unlimited storage.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
KeldairHRLever
Considered Both Products
KeldairHR
Chose KeldairHR
Hyrell was much easier to use, cheaper and the support from the team has been outstanding. When this was launched, we had each of our managers attend an online webinar. If they were unable to view this, then there have been monthly training sessions available as well as …
Chose KeldairHR
I have viewed demos for several different Applicant Tracking Systems, and Hyrell was the winner every time. One of our requirements was ease of use (If our managers struggle with functionality, they will not use it). Anyone with basic computer skills can use Hyrell....it's that …
Chose KeldairHR
Pricing was more reasonable, interface was more user-friendly and had all of the features we were looking for in an ATS system, and representatives were less pushy and more focused on meeting business needs.
Chose KeldairHR
As stated before in a previous question. I get a good number of competing companies calling me each month attempting to obtain our company as a partner. When I explain to the
Chose KeldairHR
Hyrell came up against ClearFit and ZipRecruiter. ClearFit looked very strong, but ultimately its pay per posting model didn't provide enough cost certainty. ZipRecruiter seems to be a strong player too. There was a lot of flash with ZipRecruiter but the product didn't seem as …
Chose KeldairHR
We used Jobing prior to learning about Hyrell to post our positions. There was no way to evaluate candidate answers in Jobing and we found that Hyrell was a much more all encompassing system and relatively user-friendly for us to use. I am very happy with Hyrell and have no …
Chose KeldairHR
Hyrell was the first online hiring system my company had used, but we have never felt the need to look elsewhere!
Chose KeldairHR
There are many applicant tracking systems out there. Many were too big, involved and complex (expensive) for a small company hiring at one location. I tried out several other systems; Hyrell was the cleanest interface, most intuitive and offered better functionality than the …
Chose KeldairHR
We have not used any other similar products.
Chose KeldairHR
This is the first product of this kind that I have experience using.
Lever
Chose Lever
Lever doesn't have quite as many features as Greenhouse, and Greenhouse would probably be a better choice for a large enterprise organization, but for small enterprises and below, Lever will work great, and it's quite a bit less expensive.
Chose Lever
Lever is more visually intuitive. It is a faster platform since it requires less clicking around to accomplish tasks.
Chose Lever
I think Lever stacks up fairly well and is right above the midpoint. iCIMS and GreenHouse provide a larger, more Enterprise style product for huge scale, so I'd put the two of them above Lever at this time, but we chose Lever over GreenHouse for a reason. I just don't know if …
Chose Lever
Lever's candidate first view over job requisition view is confusing and often managers are unable to get a real time update of their pipeline, I've found. I'd recommend Greenhouse
Chose Lever
Lever is comparable to Greenhouse in its basic recruiting functions. I have found it to be WAY better than Bullhorn (clunky and overly-complicated with a very dated and non-intuitive interface) and Jazz HR (slick and pretty, but limited in its functions). The best ATS I've used …
Chose Lever
I will be reaching out to Greenhouse to compare, but I am not familiar with the product just that it has a good reputation. UKG (Ulitpro) was worse than Lever when I used it last.
Chose Lever
I strongly prefer greenhouse, but lever will get the job done. Equal cost I go with greenhouse. If Lever is much cheaper they aren't wildly differentiated
Chose Lever
Lever is a great option for nonprofit organizations, campaigns, and the like. It is an easy enough system for both the operations team and prospective job candidates to use, facilitate, and navigate with little to no training. It is also a huge time saver when trying to fill …
Chose Lever
I wasn't part of the evaluation process but it seems like Lever was selected due to its simplicity and ability for employees to easily refer their friends to work here. As mentioned, I wish there was more collaboration involved throughout the hiring process--could be something …
Chose Lever
Lever is one of the best products out there because the customer support is so great. They are super helpful and can help in any way you need. This is what makes it stand out against other products.
Chose Lever
Lever is a less 'mature' ATS. Also much less expensive. iCIMS is a much more robust ATS.
Chose Lever
We have used Recruiterbox previously, but the recruitment team decommissioned it due to a few reasons that I am not sure of. However, I can see that lever generally aesthetically is more pleasing to use.
Chose Lever
I think that lever is much more secure and manageable than similar tools, especially when dealing with warm referrals. Lever may not have the outbound/social aspect that other cold-recruitment tools may have, but as I said before I think the quality of hires has increased …
Chose Lever
Lever and Recruiterbox are comparable systems. Lever allows for better "interview panels" which must be scheduled individually in Recruiterbox.
Chose Lever
We were using a free version of Breezy before. It was clunky and difficult to use. The time spent trying to navigate the product could be better spent on candidates. I used it for a few weeks while waiting for Lever to get spun up, and the transition from one to the other was …
Chose Lever
From an interviewer perspective, both are similar in that they provide easy feedback inputs and organization. Overall I liked Greenhouse better in my previous role because it seemed to have more customization around quantitative evaluation. You could break down more skills with …
Chose Lever
That's a tall order to ask. It's the latest generation ATS and seemed easier to configure than Greenhouse. SmartRecruiter didn't appear to have the reporting we wanted. In comparison to Taleo and Brassring it is superlative. It is definitely clear that they spoke to actual …
Chose Lever
I checked different products mainly based on paper. There was a kind of Gartner chart available which described the strength and weaknesses of the systems. I matched my thoughts with this document which brought me to Lever due to the following reasons: 1. Have the potential to …
Chose Lever
Lever was certainly more expensive than a beta test for GoogleHire, and about on par with Greenhouse. We ultimately went with Lever over Greenhouse due to its sleek, intuitive UI design. And we chose Lever over GoogleHire beta program because the latter didn't seem to provide …
Chose Lever
Lever is easily the most effective ATS that I've used. It blows much of the competition away with respect to how well it integrates with our email system and allows easy collaboration.
Features
KeldairHRLever
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
KeldairHR
8.4
Ratings
5% above category average
Lever
8.0
Ratings
0% above category average
Job Requisition Management8.40 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Company Website Posting9.30 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Publish to Social Media7.80 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Customized Application Form9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Resume Management9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention8.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Candidate Search8.90 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Collaboration10.00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation7.40 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Email Templates10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
User Permissions10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts7.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Reporting1.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
KeldairHRLever
Small Businesses
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 9.1 out of 10
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 9.1 out of 10
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
PeopleStrong
PeopleStrong
Score 10.0 out of 10
PeopleStrong
PeopleStrong
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
KeldairHRLever
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
1.1
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
7.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
5.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
KeldairHRLever
Likelihood to Recommend
I am not an HR expert, however the recruitment process has recently been given to me as a part of our marketing and communications efforts. As someone who is not a seasoned professional in the hiring process, Hyrell has been a godsend. It allows me to manage the process and screen applicants very easily, provides automated templates for different stages throughout the hiring process, and offers great reporting options to gain insight into the effectiveness of our efforts. For these reasons, I would say Hyrell is particularly well-suited for a small business where employees may have to wear several hats and may not necessarily be HR professionals
Read full review
Managing pipeline and candidate communication is easy through lever. Keeping it all in one place allows the hiring teams to be in the loop real-time. The reporting is clunky and basic, however, and without a 3rd party tool, sourcing from the lever database is difficult. Also, it is very easy to have duplicate candidates since the alerts Lever gives are often incorrect
Read full review
Pros
  • Very accessible customer support - if I need help getting the posting the way I want it, they are there.
  • Regularly scheduled training seminars - if you want to learn more about the program and its features, sign up.
  • Responsive technical support - when I find glitches, they will work on it until they resolve it.
Read full review
  • Great integration: Keeps a list of Outlook email communication along with LinkedIn and other data sources
  • Is fairly lively, not too much lag between screens even though it is looking through a lot of data.
  • Has excellent reporting on how well each email message is working.
Read full review
Cons
  • Pre-built reports.
  • Candidate profiles and ability for candidates to sign up for job alerts.
  • No longer a "stream" on the main dashboard to provide an overview of everything occurring in all jobs. Now, we are required to go into each individual job for that stream. This is a change from the old system.
Read full review
  • It would be nice if we were provided a more detailed summary of why our referrals were not selected for a position.
  • The feedback feature that interviewers can give on candidates is great, but it is sometimes hard to find again after completion.
  • If there is a mobile version, better marketing/awareness on this would be helpful.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No Issues, and again, the Hyrell folks have lived up to what they said they would do at the beginning!
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
It is NOT OFTEN that one gets in marriage what one is promised in courtship. Our business relationship with Hyrell has proven to be on sound footing, as Hyrell lives up to what they state in their first meeting with a potential business partner.
Read full review
It isn't difficult to use for the applicant processing, but [I feel] if you want to pull reports or use their tools, good luck!
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
I have never had an issue.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Consistent performance. Continuous software improvement. Excellent customer service.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I have never had to wait for response. Someone always speaks directly to me, sometimes more than once, and email follow-up keeps the issue in the field of vision until there is a resolution.
Read full review
What support? - Add a ticket and get links to [I believe] their unhelpful user guide. Add a charge if you want better support - afterward just got those links faster...
Read full review
In-Person Training
Emily is great at explaining!
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
It worked well!
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Ask for the help you need from your account representative and technical support. They are very helpful and easy to work with.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Hyrell was much easier to use, cheaper and the support from the team has been outstanding. When this was launched, we had each of our managers attend an online webinar. If they were unable to view this, then there have been monthly training sessions available as well as one-on-one help for the less techy folks in the company.
Read full review
I think Lever stacks up fairly well and is right above the midpoint. iCIMS and Greenhouse provide a larger, more Enterprise style product for huge scale, so I'd put the two of them above Lever at this time, but we chose Lever over Greenhouse for a reason. I just don't know if we'd be able to scale to the size we'd want to long-term with their product suite. Compared to the others listed here, and many others, I would take Lever every time.
Read full review
Scalability
Hyrell has kept us moving, tracking and hiring strong candidates, even has we have moved from hiring 1 or 2 people a month to 3 or 4 a week! Great program, good features and fantastic supportl (Thanks, Emily!!!)
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • My client has found very strong candidates much quicker than ever before. This has provided the foundations for the desired business growth.
  • The quality of the candidates coming from this platform has energized the company. Recruiting can be a dull game for many managers, but with Hyrell they see it as opportunity to easily and quickly find the right candidate to help them achieve their goals.
  • It has provided much more confidence to the company that they will be able to find the resources they need to successfully grow while they implement their business plan. It has enabled projects and plans to move forward to ready the company for its mission.
Read full review
  • We have an ATS now and did not have one before
  • LinkedIn integration is better than others I've seen
  • Spend too much time researching unhelpful user guides since their support is terrible
  • Lots of frustration with post implementation support
  • Integrations break, tools don't work and settings fail which could lead to other issues
Read full review
ScreenShots

KeldairHR Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of KeldairHR's Applicant FileScreenshot of KeldairHR's Hiring Dashboard

Lever Screenshots

Screenshot of the interface to resurface high-value past candidates who fit open roles.Screenshot of where to identify the top origin and sources of candidates in all stages, the Offer stage, and the Hired stage.Screenshot of the interface to schedule interviews with candidates.