Kooomo vs. Spryker Cloud Commerce OS

Going live with our first Kooomo shop has been a success. Having tried several other e-commerce platforms through the years it has been a great experience to go live in a very short time to market without any bugs or problems. The SAAS model has proved to be the best suited for us and Kooomo in particular, has met all our expectations.

Spryker is very well suited (B2C and/or B2B) for big companies with complex and individual business models or also if your company needs a certain level of customization. Very good fit, if you need a scalable system. It is rather not the perfect fit for small companies or companies with very basic E-Commerce needs.

• Know your store – Thanks to a friendly, modern and powerful backend I can handle more than customer orders.
• Lots of dashboards full of charts give me the ability to monitor (and export) on site traffic, turnover and merchandising performances based on a data range. I can also check customer care activity and orders statuses.
• Interesting marketing features - The system has a whole area dedicated to marketing, I can monitor my marketing campaigns, create new promotions and discounts, check customer registrations, customer reviews and more.
• Easy catalog management - even if you need to operate it manually. All information about products are accessible and fully editable. For each category you can manage meta attributes and their appearance in the menu tree.

• Extendable - you can extend the core functionalities to every business need.
• Scalable - the technical implementation supports a highly scalable system approach.
• Adjustable - besides implementing new functionalities the core functionalities can be adjusted to the business needs.
• Up-to-date - compared to other E-Business solutions, the technological foundation of Spryker is growing, with the technological development and implementations [which] are kept up-to-date with quarterly releases.

Incentivized

• There is always room for improvement, most are solved with its seamless upgrades in the cloud.

• The documentation and developer bootcamp is sometimes out-of-date.
• Open code, not open source, all bugs need to be submitted to an internal system without accepting patches from communities.
• Steep learning curve.
• The bridges at the core level sometimes cause difficulties in project-level implementation.

Spryker's usability depends a lot on custom development. Therefore, I would like not to consider usability as something that comes with Spryker Cloud Commerce OS. Spryker Cloud Commerce OS; however, brings all the tools needed to design a solution with great usability.

Support suffered from Spryker Cloud Commerce OS's rapid growth. Contacts, department heads, and support systems changed frequently. Support processes as well as documentation are rather poor. One notices that they are putting more effort into the customers recently, but in the course of growth, there is still a lack of focus here. As a customer, I would like to see growth at a slower pace and a phase of stabilization.

Incentivized

If you compare Spryker with commerce solutions on the market, you will notice that the focus is not on the front end. Spryker assumes that the store is only one of many possible channels through which customers order today and in the future. To understand the differences, one must therefore take a look at Spryker's architecture. This is divided into the Spryker [Cloud] Commerce OS (the backend with all process-related components), the front-end modules for B2C and B2B, as well as the integration modules (middleware) and interfaces (Glue API).

• Kooomo allowed me to expand the range of services offered by my company and to realize consulting or marketing activities for new clients interested in the world of ecommerce.

• Time-To-Market: With Spryker you can run MVPs in less time and you can test new functionality with certain groups of users.
• Due to its speed it is very likely to have reoccurring customer because of a very good customer experience.
• With Spryker our customers increased their revenue especially in times of Corona where orders doubled and Spryker was able to cope with the load with no substantial increase in server power.

Incentivized