LambdaTest vs. Tricentis Tosca

LambdaTest

Tricentis Tosca

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
LambdaTest	Score 8.6 out of 10	Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)	LambdaTest is a Quality Engineering Platform that offers a full-stack testing cloud with 10K+ real devices and over 3,000 browsers for cross-browser and end-to-end testing. With AI-native test management, MCP servers, and agent-based automation, LambdaTest supports Selenium, Appium, Playwright, and all major frameworks. AI Agents like HyperExecute and KaneAI bring AI and cloud into test workflows, enabling automation testing with 100+ integrations. From infrastructure to…	$19 per month Parallel Test
Tricentis Tosca	Score 8.2 out of 10	N/A	Tricentis Tosca provides an approach to test automation that is AI-powered, codeless, and end-to-end so it can test everything in a complex IT landscape, to ensure business processes work flawlessly no matter where changes occurs. Its 160+ technology support helps users test everything at the UI, API and data layer, including virtually any enterprise, custom, homegrown and mobile application. With its model-based approach, Tosca enables business, QA and IT teams to…	N/A

Pricing

LambdaTest

Tricentis Tosca

Editions & Modules

Live: $19
per month Parallel Test
Real Device (Includes Live): $35
per month Parallel Test
Web & Mobile Browser Automation: $119
per month Parallel Test
Native App Automation: $149
per month Parallel Test
Web & Mobile Browser on Real Device: $158
per month Parallel Test
HyperExecute Cloud (Multi OS): $199
per month Parallel Test
SmartUI Visual Regression: $219
per month Parallel Test
Enterprise: Custom Pricing
Parallel Test
HyperExecute On-Premise: Custom Pricing
per parallel test

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
LambdaTest	Tricentis Tosca
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Optional

Additional Details

Discount available for annual pricing.

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	LambdaTest	Tricentis Tosca
Considered Both Products	LambdaTest HP hardik panchal Quality Assurance Engineer Chose LambdaTest The reason I have selected LambdaTest is that earlier I have used BrowserStack in my workflow, but when I got to know from the industry expert about LambdaTest, then I explored it on my own, and I found that it's a very cost-effective and slightly more flexible for our project … Incentivized Helpful? Ajay Rabari Shopify Developer Chose LambdaTest While Browserstack is also a well-established platform, we found LambdaTest to offer similar and even better features at reasonable pricing. LambdaTest is more cost-effective than Browserstack. LambdaTest provides a free forever plan, while Browserstack does not. Even manual … Incentivized Helpful? RS Rohit Sharma Web Developer Chose LambdaTest What I love most about LambdaTest is the real-time device testing. It makes it so much easier to spot specific issues across different devices, something that's usually tough when you don’t have access to a full range of physical devices. So as compare to the competitors it … Incentivized Helpful? RS Raj Singh Unity Developer Chose LambdaTest ClickUp and Atlassian Jira Incentivized Helpful? Danish Amin Senior Full Stack Developer Chose LambdaTest LambdaTest has been a better choice because these platforms lack in many features like the third party integration, availability of number of devices, and most importantly its quicker than all and thats the most important aspect which led to switch LambdaTest, They also provide … Incentivized Helpful? Srikar Mattapally Senior engineer Chose LambdaTest Performance,ease of use and features Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose LambdaTest I find LambdaTest interface clean and understandable, and team support is also fast which is best. Incentivized Helpful? NR Natarajan Ramanathan Engineering Manager Chose LambdaTest BrowserStack and HeadSpin Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose LambdaTest The thing which I like about LambdaTest is it has wide range of devices for both platforms Android as well as iOS, which makes testing a lot easier without actually owning those devices. We can also set different custom configuration for devices which help in testing the edge … Incentivized Helpful? Somnath Nayek Sr Technology consultant Chose LambdaTest We have used all the products in past but in LambdaTest they are providing all the facility and features in a single application which is really helpful for an organization. Apart from their support during the deploying and customized features for organization specifi makes it … Incentivized Helpful? VK Vikash Kumar Manager Chose LambdaTest I feel that the UI and UX of BrowserStack are not on par with LambdaTest. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose LambdaTest User friendly and easy to raise bugs Incentivized Helpful? AJ Akshat Jain SDET Chose LambdaTest Good user interface and simple integration Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose LambdaTest AWS device farm does not come close to LambdaTest in terms of capability and user expereince in mobile devices testing. Device farm lags a lot and device model updates are slower when compared to LambdaTest. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose LambdaTest We select LambdaTest because of its superb features and multi tasking work properties which give us a extremely good working experience with the projects and building client trust at the same time. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose LambdaTest LambdaTest has a competitive pricing which suited our budget Incentivized Helpful? AC Amol Chede Technical Project Manager Chose LambdaTest ZAPTEST Incentivized Helpful? IG Isar Gangwani QA Chose LambdaTest It's 50 % cheaper and better then the alternatives and gets the job done! Incentivized Helpful? RS Rajdeep Sinha CEO Chose LambdaTest BrowserStack Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose LambdaTest When comparing LambdaTest with tools like BrowserStack, TestSigma, and BugBug, LambdaTest stands out with its affordable pricing and rich set of features like geolocation testing and smart analytics, making it a solid choice for teams that need a balance between functionality … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose LambdaTest We chose LambdaTest over BrowserStack and Sauce Labs because it offers a cost-effective, easy-to-use, and efficient cloud-based testing solution. While BrowserStack has better real-device support and Sauce Labs excels in enterprise automation, LambdaTest balances affordability, … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose LambdaTest By using the Lambda Test is faster, smarter with more capabilities than Browser stack. Browser stack more expensive then LambdaTest. Incentivized Helpful? Abhishek Banerjee Assistant manager Chose LambdaTest 1.Automated testing 2.intigration Incentivized Helpful? AI Abhishek Ingole Consultant Chose LambdaTest ClickUp, Atlassian Jira, Ayasdi Core and BookJane Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose LambdaTest I have not really used any other testing tools as much as I have used LambdaTest tool as it is currently the best option with the widest range of features and services. Other services definitely lack in terms of the options and features the users are being given access to. Incentivized Helpful?	Tricentis Tosca Sushmita Patil Senior Business Analyst Chose Tricentis Tosca Depending on the prices concern and fast execution Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca User friendly interface is key to any tool usage. If the features supported by tool is enormous but the interface is not easy to use, then the product will not reach its optimal usage. Tosca scores high numbers with this regard. The documentations and KB articles it supports … Incentivized Helpful? juan eng paw Senior Technical Manager SA Chose Tricentis Tosca UFT was mostly record and replay and Tricentis Tosca best fit our purpose as it was easier to create modules and make quick changes when needed. Overall easier and quicker to make changes to our existing test cases. therefore we haven't used UFT anymore. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Tricentis Tosca has higher stability than Certica Solutions Incentivized Helpful? Yogendra Singh Test Automation Expert Chose Tricentis Tosca As Tricentis Tosca is one of the first tools to implement the model based test automation, it is way ahead of the similar kind of tools. be it creating and innovating new strategies to overcome the existing hurdles faced during automation like, self healing feature is quite … Incentivized Helpful? AB Atanu Biswas Automation and Performance Test Lead Chose Tricentis Tosca Selenium, Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence and ACCELQ Incentivized Helpful? Mouleeswaran Andi E Test Analyst Chose Tricentis Tosca Even though selenium is open source tool we have lot restriction in selenium. Using selenium we can automate only web based application. If we need to automate other application we work with other tools. Maintenance of Selenium code is complex when compare to Tricentis Tosca. … Incentivized Helpful? Anant Joshi Sr. Director Chose Tricentis Tosca The overall user experience and the ease of use while automation ERP system was better in Tricentis Tosca. The integration was seamless especially for SAP and SFDC system. I think the maintenance efforts required in Tricentis Tosca is very less as compared to Katalon. The … Incentivized Helpful? Sneha Gangan Manore Senior Analyst Chose Tricentis Tosca This tool covers all from functional testing to rpa and mobile testing cloud based testing visual testing and accessibility testing is easily possible. It is easy to implement start work in less time. All the testing kinds performance can also be tested and customized reports … Incentivized Helpful? Ganesh Muralidharan Global Delivery Head Chose Tricentis Tosca Micro Focus UFT requires coding skills. Worksoft supports SAP very well but web app automation was challenging. Provar is only for Salesforce automation. Selenium required an automation engineer with Java knowledge and framework dependency. Tricentis Tosca did not require any … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Good on flexibility and provided much option to cover different aspects of automation testing. Incentivized Helpful? BW Bernd Weigl Teamleiter Quality Assurance Chose Tricentis Tosca Best Module and Scan approach, Libs rule, and PL Libs are the best things ever! Incentivized Helpful? Nikhil Puniyani Software Engineer Chose Tricentis Tosca As our product required wide rage of testing start from web testing to desktop automation also, we gone through the feature provided by Tosca and decided it will be good fit for end to end automation. Even though from our team no one is aware of how to use the tools, the guide … Incentivized Helpful? Vinayak Bandewar Test Architect Chose Tricentis Tosca Other tools are focused on limited applications or technologies. With Tricentis Tosca you can do almost everything which makes it one-stop solution for all needs.Tosca is codeless vs others which requires coding. Tosca has inbuilt repository which other tools lack. Tosca also … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Tricentis Tosca provides a uniform interface for al testers and avoids the requirement for coding. Tricentis Tosca also offers test capabilities across the enterprise that other tools do not. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Tricentis Tosca is better as the first testing tool to introduce in a news organization. I believe it's the testing tool that is the easiest to introduce and adopt. It is oriented toward manual testers that would like to start automation but it is less oriented toward … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Mostly the ease of use from day one by introducing the no-code approach for teams with non-technical contributors. Also, the amount of technologies it covers is greater than other tools that are specialized in web-only or API, for example. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Tricentis Tosca has more functionality and is easier to implement. It also has more compatibility with other applications, and the support is much more responsive. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Tricentis Tosca is codeless and therefore easier to use. It's a great tool for people that would start doing automation and have no coding background. It seems like it has the same capabilities as other test automation suites but I felt it lacked a bit of capabilities on the … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Tricentis Tosca is an easy to use tool which can apply to almost any business process. The customer support program appears to be a program which will put the use of the tool on track with our protfolios. Ease of implementation and total application capabilities across … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Because of it's great support for cross browser/cross device and devops, this really makes the cut against it's peers. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca I have really minimum exposure with QTP and ALM, barely 2 months or so, for this reason I would not like to comment on how Tosca stacks up against them, but something that I really like about Selenium is that it is really simple and easy to setup, doesn't require a heavy … Incentivized Helpful? Raghuram Rangamani Associate Project Manager Chose Tricentis Tosca Before going in for TOSCA we tried to use Selenium / UFT. But TOSCA stacked much ahead than other tools. Incentivized Helpful? DL david leo Developer Chose Tricentis Tosca Its easy to use and reliable Its easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliable Its easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca qTest is the "brain" of the suite. You can use just Tricentis Tosca and can be enough to have results, but if you want have the management of executions, results and even manual test, this is your app. Incentivized Helpful?

Features

LambdaTest

Tricentis Tosca

Automation Testing

Comparison of Automation Testing features of Product A and Product B
	LambdaTest - Ratings	Tricentis Tosca 8.3 Ratings 2% below category average
Record and Automate	00 Ratings	7.70 Ratings
Multi-Browser Testing	00 Ratings	8.70 Ratings
Mobile Testing	00 Ratings	7.40 Ratings
Test Scheduling	00 Ratings	8.70 Ratings
Test Management	00 Ratings	8.70 Ratings
CI/CD Tool Integration	00 Ratings	8.00 Ratings
Parallel Testing	00 Ratings	8.70 Ratings
Object Recognition	00 Ratings	8.80 Ratings
Data-Driven Testing	00 Ratings	8.80 Ratings
Real Device Testing	00 Ratings	7.90 Ratings
Testing Reports & Analytics	00 Ratings	8.20 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	LambdaTest	Tricentis Tosca
Small Businesses	BrowserStack Score 8.6 out of 10	BrowserStack Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Selenium Score 8.1 out of 10	ReadyAPI Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprises	Selenium Score 8.1 out of 10	ignio AIOps Score 8.1 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	LambdaTest	Tricentis Tosca
Likelihood to Recommend	8.6 (0 ratings)	8.3 (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	9.0 (0 ratings)	7.7 (0 ratings)
Usability	8.8 (0 ratings)	3.6 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	9.1 (0 ratings)	8.2 (0 ratings)
Implementation Rating	9.1 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	LambdaTest	Tricentis Tosca
Likelihood to Recommend	As reactnative devs we develop hybrid apps for both ios and Android and testing on different physical devices is very annoying while as with LambdaTest we can just select the virtual device boot that and start testing on the go. No need to keep devices. Sometimes clients report issues and they provide the device name and if available in LambdaTest we can just test and fix the device specific bugs Danish Amin Senior Full Stack Developer Read full review	Tricentis Tosca is well suited for packaged applications like SAP, Salesforce, Workday, etc. It also works well with API testing and Web UI testing. Tosca is highly suited for Projects which require a high level of collaboration between team members across different locations. It's less suited for mobile automation, Reporting, and test scenarios with high input data. Incentivized Vinayak Bandewar Test Architect Read full review
Pros	Offers geolocation testing in automation which is amazing! You can select browsers, timezone, country and run the capability to start testing instantly. We could scale up with parallel testing on local environment without any maintenance cost. Integration with project management tools like JIRA, CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Gitlab which makes our test cycle easier Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Tosca provides a one-stop solution for your test-automation needs. One can use it to automate testing of desktop (web/stand-alone) applications, Mobile(Native as well as Web) applications etc. It is a great tool since it not only helps in test automation but also in maintaining a suite for Manual testing. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	More real devices should be added like I have Samsung mobile but it was not in the list It takes time in checking the link on LambdaTest if we compare with real mobiles Sometimes exact results are not matching as from real mobiles Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Documentation - struggled multiple times with features not explained very well, or not explained at all The only support is on Tricentis Forums, where, sometimes, based on 'luck' - you will open a support case, and wait few days until you get the chance to speak with someone from Tricentis and show case your issue Incentivized AI Alexandru Cristian Ion QA Engineer Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	The reason i have given the 10 points becasue the problem LambdaTest solves is providing access to all devices in one place, allowing developers to identify the same errors they would encounter on real devices. This makes life much easier, especially for developers who regularly face cross-device functionality issues. It's a big plus point that positions LambdaTest as an all-in-one solution. Incentivized RS Rohit Sharma Web Developer Read full review	We aim to renew Tosca for our organization. What we lose in license cost is gained by having employee that do not need programming background. We also recoup a lot of the cost on the rapidity of automation. Only the support we might not use as much. I believe Tosca is here to stay at our organization Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	Using LambdaTest feels pretty straightforward once you get the hang of it. The platform has a clean interface so jumping between different features isn’t much work. things feel smooth in UI automation. It takes some time to understand the overall once that is done it'll become easier. The detailed test logs and visual regression features especially stand out in helping you identify issues quickly without extra effort. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	It can be a challenge for new users who have never used an automation tool. For example, it is hard to understand the layout of the screen and where to find how to update the data. The interface can be overwhelming at first. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Reliability and Availability	yes always available Incentivized VK Vikash Kumar Manager Read full review	No answers on this topic
Performance	haven't found any glitch while using this Incentivized VK Vikash Kumar Manager Read full review	No answers on this topic
Support Rating	The customer support team is very active and cooperative. Once, I contacted them in their off timings because of an issue, I got an instant reply from the executive and he resolved the issue very efficiently. This is why we have been using LambdaTest for more than two years. It is best suited for us. Katie Hans Software Automation Engineer Read full review	Tricentis team was very supportive. Support is expensive but they helped us at many level. Setting up timeline, implementation, precise questions on automation challenges. We had an account manager and technical people we could as to talk to. Support was generally timely and helping. They often proposed to come on site to help us which would cost more but could be helpful Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
In-Person Training	No answers on this topic	It would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is better Incentivized david leo Developer Read full review
Online Training	No answers on this topic	okIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is better Incentivized david leo Developer Read full review
Implementation Rating	Implementation of Lambdatest was very easy for different project requirements. Incentivized PH Prasanna HR QA Tech Lead Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	While BrowserStack is also a well-established platform, we found LambdaTest to offer similar and even better features at reasonable pricing. LambdaTest is more cost-effective than BrowserStack. LambdaTest provides a free forever plan, while BrowserStack does not. Even manual testing plans are better priced than BrowserStack’s. In terms of UI and onboarding, we found LambdaTest more user-friendly as well. Ajay Rabari Shopify Developer Read full review	User friendly interface is key to any tool usage. If the features supported by tool is enormous but the interface is not easy to use, then the product will not reach its optimal usage. Tosca scores high numbers with this regard. The documentations and KB articles it supports are very helpful and allows us to solve our issues independently. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Scalability	not all department, but we're using for our clients Incentivized VK Vikash Kumar Manager Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Automation testing has a bit of a learning curve Lack of real device keep that bug in your head if not on the website. Need to wait for a while for a new OS or browser version on the contrary of immediate availability in case of owning a lab Keir Smith Full-stack Developer Read full review	It really had a very good impact on our ROI. We were able to automate most of the apps and layers with in it and get a very short execution time which led to increased releases with in short span of time. Time to market really improved and efficiency of developing scripts was not too bad. With built in test dashboards, it was easy to pull metrics and share the insights with management. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots	LambdaTest Screenshots	Tricentis Tosca Screenshots