TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Lansweeper vs. ManageEngine Endpoint Central

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Lansweeper

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/ALansweeper is an IT asset management solution that provides network discovery of all connected users, devices, and software within the IT estate. Lansweeper's device recognition capabilities provide complete visibility across the entire IT estate, in one centralized IT inventory. Lansweeper automatically and continuously discovers IT assets across infrastructure — servers, laptops, desktops, virtual & cloud machines, networks devices and IoT assets— in order to…

    $2,868

    per year (includes 2000 assets)

    ManageEngine Endpoint Central

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/ADesktop Central from ManageEngine is a client desktop management with patching, remote control, and configuration.

    $795

    per year per user

    Pricing
    LansweeperManageEngine Endpoint Central
    Editions & Modules
    Starter
    $2868
    per year Includes 2,000 assets
    Pro
    $5268
    per year Includes 2,000 assets
    Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    Starts at 10,000 Assets
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    LansweeperManageEngine Endpoint Central
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    LansweeperManageEngine Endpoint Central
    Considered Both Products
    Lansweeper
    No answer on this topic
    ManageEngine, A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    I've evaluated Spiceworks, ManageEngine, PDQ, and Lansweeper, and have settled on using ManageEngine as my goto. Software deployment is better in ManageEngine vs PDQ and Lansweeper since it is agent based, and works regardless of network location. Lansweeper has better …
    Incentivized
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    It holds up very well even against the microsoft native solution Microsoft Intune.
    The Configurations are easy to set up and apply quickly over the selected scope of Clients.
    You have a almost real time inventory of everything detected by the agent.
    Incentivized
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    Dollar for dollar, ManageEngine seems to be the most bang for your buck self-hosted solution. NinjaOne is cloud deployment only which can really add up over time, and KACE while better for scripting and asset management charges a premium for all of the extra modules that are …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    LansweeperManageEngine Endpoint Central
    IT Asset Management
    Comparison of IT Asset Management features of Lansweeper and ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    Feature
    Lansweeper
    8.0
    12 Ratings
    ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    -
    Ratings
    Software and hardware inventory tracking8.012 Ratings00 Ratings
    License management8.08 Ratings00 Ratings
    Asset lifecycle monitoring8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Asset relationship management8.011 Ratings00 Ratings
    User Ratings
    LansweeperManageEngine Endpoint Central
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (14 ratings)
    9.0
    (54 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.3
    (6 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.9
    (14 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.9
    (3 ratings)
    7.8
    (7 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)