Lever vs. RecruitBPM

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Lever
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Lever is a Talent Acquisition Suite designed to help talent teams to reach their hiring goals and to connect companies with top talent. Lever provides ATS and applicant CRM capabilities, in LeverTRM. The Lever Hire and Lever Nurture features allow leaders to grow their people pipeline, build long-lasting relationships, and source the right people. Lever Analytics provides customized reports with data visualization, see offers completed and interview feedback, and it informs strategic decisions…N/A
RecruitBPM
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
RecruitBPM is a recruiting suite. It includes core ATS features, as well as CRM, Microsoft Office and Google Suite integrations, and reporting tools. It is available in a basic version and a premium edition with more features and billed on a monthly or annual basis.
$29
per month
Pricing
LeverRecruitBPM
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
3-9 (yearly plan)
$29
per month
1-2 (yearly plan)
$39
per month
3-9 (monthly plan)
$39
per month
1-2 (monthly plan)
$59
per month
10+ (yearly or monthly)
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LeverRecruitBPM
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
LeverRecruitBPM
Considered Both Products
Lever
Chose Lever
Lever doesn't have quite as many features as Greenhouse, and Greenhouse would probably be a better choice for a large enterprise organization, but for small enterprises and below, Lever will work great, and it's quite a bit less expensive.
Chose Lever
Lever is more visually intuitive. It is a faster platform since it requires less clicking around to accomplish tasks.
Chose Lever
I think Lever stacks up fairly well and is right above the midpoint. iCIMS and GreenHouse provide a larger, more Enterprise style product for huge scale, so I'd put the two of them above Lever at this time, but we chose Lever over GreenHouse for a reason. I just don't know if …
Chose Lever
Lever's candidate first view over job requisition view is confusing and often managers are unable to get a real time update of their pipeline, I've found. I'd recommend Greenhouse
Chose Lever
Lever is comparable to Greenhouse in its basic recruiting functions. I have found it to be WAY better than Bullhorn (clunky and overly-complicated with a very dated and non-intuitive interface) and Jazz HR (slick and pretty, but limited in its functions). The best ATS I've used …
Chose Lever
I will be reaching out to Greenhouse to compare, but I am not familiar with the product just that it has a good reputation. UKG (Ulitpro) was worse than Lever when I used it last.
Chose Lever
I strongly prefer greenhouse, but lever will get the job done. Equal cost I go with greenhouse. If Lever is much cheaper they aren't wildly differentiated
Chose Lever
Lever is a great option for nonprofit organizations, campaigns, and the like. It is an easy enough system for both the operations team and prospective job candidates to use, facilitate, and navigate with little to no training. It is also a huge time saver when trying to fill …
Chose Lever
I wasn't part of the evaluation process but it seems like Lever was selected due to its simplicity and ability for employees to easily refer their friends to work here. As mentioned, I wish there was more collaboration involved throughout the hiring process--could be something …
Chose Lever
Lever is one of the best products out there because the customer support is so great. They are super helpful and can help in any way you need. This is what makes it stand out against other products.
Chose Lever
Lever is a less 'mature' ATS. Also much less expensive. iCIMS is a much more robust ATS.
Chose Lever
We have used Recruiterbox previously, but the recruitment team decommissioned it due to a few reasons that I am not sure of. However, I can see that lever generally aesthetically is more pleasing to use.
Chose Lever
I think that lever is much more secure and manageable than similar tools, especially when dealing with warm referrals. Lever may not have the outbound/social aspect that other cold-recruitment tools may have, but as I said before I think the quality of hires has increased …
Chose Lever
Lever and Recruiterbox are comparable systems. Lever allows for better "interview panels" which must be scheduled individually in Recruiterbox.
Chose Lever
We were using a free version of Breezy before. It was clunky and difficult to use. The time spent trying to navigate the product could be better spent on candidates. I used it for a few weeks while waiting for Lever to get spun up, and the transition from one to the other was …
Chose Lever
From an interviewer perspective, both are similar in that they provide easy feedback inputs and organization. Overall I liked Greenhouse better in my previous role because it seemed to have more customization around quantitative evaluation. You could break down more skills with …
Chose Lever
That's a tall order to ask. It's the latest generation ATS and seemed easier to configure than Greenhouse. SmartRecruiter didn't appear to have the reporting we wanted. In comparison to Taleo and Brassring it is superlative. It is definitely clear that they spoke to actual …
Chose Lever
I checked different products mainly based on paper. There was a kind of Gartner chart available which described the strength and weaknesses of the systems. I matched my thoughts with this document which brought me to Lever due to the following reasons: 1. Have the potential to …
Chose Lever
Lever was certainly more expensive than a beta test for GoogleHire, and about on par with Greenhouse. We ultimately went with Lever over Greenhouse due to its sleek, intuitive UI design. And we chose Lever over GoogleHire beta program because the latter didn't seem to provide …
Chose Lever
Lever is easily the most effective ATS that I've used. It blows much of the competition away with respect to how well it integrates with our email system and allows easy collaboration.
RecruitBPM
Chose RecruitBPM
We found RecruitBPM most user friendly and feature rich for our business needs. It's a comprehensive solution for the entire recruiting, onboarding, and back office. But if you are looking for point-base solution like just CRM or just back office, this might be overkill. Price …
Chose RecruitBPM
Bullhorn is a great product and we have good experiences but it has a mix of many products bought separately and put together. So, integration is not native and seamless. On the other hand, RecruitBPM is all in one product. Bullhorn definitely has more products it's integrated …
Chose RecruitBPM
We felt RecruitBPM stacks up similarly against Bullhorn, Jobdiva or Vincere, but it's easier to learn and more affordable. We had demo and trail with half a dozen products and our choice was pure base on value. We felt it was a better and cost-effective alternative to …
Chose RecruitBPM
RecruitBPM will give the quick view of the candidate module with direct access to the resume.
- the parser to import data directly from the resume
- the possibility to rate candidates
Chose RecruitBPM
We've used cBiz (and a few of the big time platforms) in the past, but we haven't found anything that compares on the cost-benefit side of things. There really is minimal cost with RecruitBPM, and it does everything that we need it to do.
Features
LeverRecruitBPM
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Lever
8.0
Ratings
0% above category average
RecruitBPM
9.3
Ratings
15% above category average
Job Requisition Management8.00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Company Website Posting8.00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Publish to Social Media7.90 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting8.00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Customized Application Form8.00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Resume Management8.00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention8.00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Candidate Search8.00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Applicant Tracking8.00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Collaboration7.90 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation8.00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Email Templates8.00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
User Permissions8.00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts8.00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Reporting8.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Best Alternatives
LeverRecruitBPM
Small Businesses
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 9.1 out of 10
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 9.1 out of 10
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
PeopleStrong
PeopleStrong
Score 9.9 out of 10
PeopleStrong
PeopleStrong
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
LeverRecruitBPM
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Usability
5.0
(0 ratings)
9.8
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.1
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
LeverRecruitBPM
Likelihood to Recommend
Managing pipeline and candidate communication is easy through lever. Keeping it all in one place allows the hiring teams to be in the loop real-time. The reporting is clunky and basic, however, and without a 3rd party tool, sourcing from the lever database is difficult. Also, it is very easy to have duplicate candidates since the alerts Lever gives are often incorrect
Read full review
RecruitBPM is more suitable for volume hiring and where is speed is key. The product does really well on client and candidate relationship management with auto workflow and reminders. Also in situations where clients require consent form since RecruitBPM has built e-sign at no additional cost. RecruitBPM is not super supportive if you want the Andriod app. Even though RecruitBPM is mobile-friendly, it's not tailored for Android phones.
Read full review
Pros
  • Great integration: Keeps a list of Outlook email communication along with LinkedIn and other data sources
  • Is fairly lively, not too much lag between screens even though it is looking through a lot of data.
  • Has excellent reporting on how well each email message is working.
Read full review
  • Applicant Tracking is the name of the game with RecruitBPM, and it does this very, very well. We have no issues tracking our contacts, leads, companies, clients, and consultants.
  • The dashboard is beautiful. It has a collection of everything we need to know. It covers new leads, emails sent, job orders, sales and recruiting team items, and pretty much whatever else you'd like to customize.
  • The customer support is fantastic. There was something that we thought their platform was missing, and they added it in for us in less than a week.
  • It doesn't feel clunky like some of the other platforms do.
  • This is all you really care about, at the end of the day, right? Does it do what we need it to do? Yes. Is it expensive? Not even close.
Read full review
Cons
  • It would be nice if we were provided a more detailed summary of why our referrals were not selected for a position.
  • The feedback feature that interviewers can give on candidates is great, but it is sometimes hard to find again after completion.
  • If there is a mobile version, better marketing/awareness on this would be helpful.
Read full review
  • Too many features does get overwhelming initially, would be good to have modules divided for specific features
  • We needed several demos to understand how to use it
Read full review
Usability
It isn't difficult to use for the applicant processing, but [I feel] if you want to pull reports or use their tools, good luck!
Read full review
Easy of you and fast learning experience. Usability and a minimal number of clicks were one of the key factors for us. Having built-in workflows, custom user access, and automation was a deal maker for us.
Read full review
Support Rating
What support? - Add a ticket and get links to [I believe] their unhelpful user guide. Add a charge if you want better support - afterward just got those links faster...
Read full review
They are quick to respond and provide guidance, it takes some time to get a demo done in some cases
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I think Lever stacks up fairly well and is right above the midpoint. iCIMS and Greenhouse provide a larger, more Enterprise style product for huge scale, so I'd put the two of them above Lever at this time, but we chose Lever over Greenhouse for a reason. I just don't know if we'd be able to scale to the size we'd want to long-term with their product suite. Compared to the others listed here, and many others, I would take Lever every time.
Read full review
We found RecruitBPM most user friendly and feature rich for our business needs. It's a comprehensive solution for the entire recruiting, onboarding, and back office. But if you are looking for point-base solution like just CRM or just back office, this might be overkill. Price is very reasonable.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We have an ATS now and did not have one before
  • LinkedIn integration is better than others I've seen
  • Spend too much time researching unhelpful user guides since their support is terrible
  • Lots of frustration with post implementation support
  • Integrations break, tools don't work and settings fail which could lead to other issues
Read full review
  • With RecruitBPM I'm being able to manage several job boards from one location helps improve our productivity since we can do everything in one tab.
  • Has a slight learning curve for those who haven't used a CRM before. Otherwise an intuitive and easy-to-understand UI.
  • Easy to use and understand, got the hang of it after 10 mins love the dashboard where you can clearly see the number of candidates per role.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Lever Screenshots

Screenshot of the interface to resurface high-value past candidates who fit open roles.Screenshot of where to identify the top origin and sources of candidates in all stages, the Offer stage, and the Hired stage.Screenshot of the interface to schedule interviews with candidates.

RecruitBPM Screenshots

Screenshot of Responsive DashboardScreenshot of Job listingScreenshot of Career PortalScreenshot of Applicant profile