Auvik vs. LogicMonitor

LogicMonitor

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Auvik	Score9.9 out of 10	N/A	Auvik Network Management is a vendor-agnostic cloud-based network monitoring and management solution providing automated network discovery. Auvik requires no service hardware or disruptive maintenance cycles and provides onboarding and training for new and existing users. Auvik delivers visibility and automation to reduce friction for IT teams and allow them to give end users the freedom to work wherever and however they…	N/A
LogicMonitor	Score8.3 out of 10	Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)	LogicMonitor’s SaaS-based platform, LM Envision, enables observability across on-prem and multi-cloud environments. It provides IT and business teams operational visibility and predictability across their technologies and applications.	N/A

Pricing

Auvik

LogicMonitor

No answers on this topic

Enterprise: Contact sales team
Website Monitoring: Contact sales team

Pricing Offerings
Auvik	LogicMonitor
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	Yes

No setup fee

Pricing is calculated per number of switches, routers, firewalls, and controllers. Everything else is monitored for free.

Our platform is broken down into Pro and Enterprise Pricing. Pro includes monitoring for all of your cloud, hybrid, and on-premises infrastructure. Our Enterprise package includes all of this, plus our AIOps and Machine Learning functionality that provides dynamic thresholds, root cause analysis, anomaly detection and more! LogicMonitor only charges by the device. What is considered a device? A device is anything with an IP address that you want to monitor, including a physical device or a cloud resource. This means multiple data sources under the same IP address can be monitored for the same price. Unlike some monitoring platforms. we don’t charge per node, interface, or metric.

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	Auvik	LogicMonitor
Considered Both Products	Auvik Networks Inc. Verified User Chose Auvik Auvik was was simpler to configure and utilize. Less noise, less configuration, and more user-friendly. We moved from LogicMonitor due to be being overkill for us and too much time commitment to get things online and functional. Auvik network scanning and automatic discovery … Incentivized Helpful? Jeff Aiken vCIO in Information Technology at Emerge (Information Technology & Services, 51-200 employees) Chose Auvik Actually, we went from Auvik to LogicMonitor, Auvik is like playing with Tinker Toys compared to LogicMonitor. We moved from Auvik to LogicMonitor for a bunch of reasons, pricing was among them. Auvik charges extra for Netflow monitoring where LogicMonitor has is included. If … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Auvik Auvik was better in two key respects: MSP-friendly pricing and also in the ability for less experienced technicians to set it up and use it. Incentivized Helpful? Don Squibb IT Operations/Networking in Corporate at Verafin (Computer Software, 501-1000 employees) Chose Auvik It's just easier to use and the support is wonderful. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Auvik Auvik has a been recommended by other companies we have relation with and we started using it as the test. However we are using it more than we ever thought! Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Auvik Much easier to install and use, great prebuilt monitoring configurations, cheaper than other paid platforms Incentivized Helpful?	LogicMonitor Chris St Pierre Manager of Operations in Customer Service at Next Dimension Inc. (Information Technology & Services, 11-50 employees) Chose LogicMonitor Auvik did not provide historical data and could not monitor as many device types as LM. We found the Auvik collector to be more "buggy" and have had less issues with LM. We do feel that Auvik had a better network topology map and would clearly show device relationship. That is … Incentivized Helpful? Ali Gaeta Manager of Managed Services in Information Technology at Internetwork Engineering (Information Technology & Services, 51-200 employees) Chose LogicMonitor SolarWinds had the big breach just as we left it. We loved how powerful it was, and how customizable - however, it is an ON-Prem tool, and as a growing MSP, that dynamic didn't and couldn't scale. We then moved to Auvik, which had the cleanest GUI and some neat features. That … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose LogicMonitor Auvik was much more simple to use, and the graphical representation of the network topology was very useful for networking. LogicMonitor definitely has the upper hand in the amount of information you can manage, however. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose LogicMonitor Auvik and LogicMonitor are very different, but certainly competitors. Both solutions provide alerting. Auvik focuses on network equipment (firewalls, switches, etc), whereas LogicMonitor is more a jack of all trades alerting platform including servers, VMware, and websites. For… Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose LogicMonitor We used LogicMonitor and ended up switching to Auvik for a variety of price, performance, and integration reasons. LogicMonitor did not suit us as an MSP. Incentivized Helpful? Sam Kemp CIO in Information Technology at SH Data Technologies (Computer & Network Security, 11-50 employees) Chose LogicMonitor We replaced Auvik with LogicMonitor. Their product dev went stale and did not fulfill some of our requests when we signed up with them some years ago. Incentivized Helpful? Jeff Aiken vCIO in Information Technology at Emerge (Information Technology & Services, 51-200 employees) Chose LogicMonitor We currently use both Passler PRTG and Logic Monitor, we were looking for something to replace PRTG with and thought that we found the correct tool in Auvik. We quickly realized that Auvik was very easy to stand up, but once up it would take an army of engineers to configure … Incentivized Helpful? Stuart Carrison IT Director in Information Technology at Radley and Co LTD (Retail, 201-500 employees) Chose LogicMonitor SaaS monitoring makes so much sense. Why run your monitoring inside the same environment you're trying to monitor, and how do you monitor your on prem monitoring if there's an outage affecting your own infrastructure? Whilst LogicMonitor isn't a specific point solution so … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose LogicMonitor Our initial business requirements in 2016 were to monitor Vblock and FlexPod deployments. We had specific gaps with particular storage appliances the monitoring tool we used at that time could not monitor effectively. When evaluating the mentioned solutions, LogicMonitor was … Incentivized Helpful? Sean Sellars Systems Engineer in Information Technology at Next Dimension Inc. (Computer & Network Security, 11-50 employees) Chose LogicMonitor Again, I really want to say how much I like the customization options with LogicMonitor when compared to previous solutions I've worked with. Also want to call out the fact that the deployment and configuration in new managed environments take less of our team's time to … Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic

Features

Auvik

LogicMonitor

Comparison of Network Performance Monitoring features of Auvik and LogicMonitor
Feature	Auvik 7.9 106 Ratings	LogicMonitor - Ratings
Automated network device discovery	9.6105 Ratings	00 Ratings
Network monitoring	8.8106 Ratings	00 Ratings
Baseline threshold calculation	7.883 Ratings	00 Ratings
Alerts	8.6105 Ratings	00 Ratings
Network capacity planning	7.683 Ratings	00 Ratings
Packet capture analysis	7.065 Ratings	00 Ratings
Network mapping	8.4104 Ratings	00 Ratings
Customizable reports	5.678 Ratings	00 Ratings
Wireless infrastructure monitoring	7.485 Ratings	00 Ratings
Hardware health monitoring	8.296 Ratings	00 Ratings

User Ratings
	Auvik	LogicMonitor
Likelihood to Recommend	8.3 (118 ratings)	9.6 (170 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	9.8 (2 ratings)	6.7 (8 ratings)
Usability	7.3 (1 ratings)	8.3 (29 ratings)
Availability	9.1 (1 ratings)	9.1 (1 ratings)
Performance	8.2 (1 ratings)	9.1 (1 ratings)
Support Rating	9.7 (4 ratings)	9.3 (109 ratings)
In-Person Training	- (0 ratings)	8.2 (1 ratings)
Online Training	- (0 ratings)	7.3 (1 ratings)
Implementation Rating	- (0 ratings)	9.8 (16 ratings)
Configurability	- (0 ratings)	9.1 (1 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model	- (0 ratings)	7.4 (5 ratings)
Ease of integration	- (0 ratings)	7.3 (1 ratings)
Product Scalability	9.1 (1 ratings)	9.1 (1 ratings)
Professional Services	- (0 ratings)	7.6 (4 ratings)
Vendor post-sale	10.0 (1 ratings)	9.1 (1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale	10.0 (1 ratings)	9.1 (1 ratings)

Auvik vs. LogicMonitor

Auvik

LogicMonitor

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons