TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

LogicMonitor vs. Kaseya Traverse

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    LogicMonitor

    Score8.3 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    LogicMonitor’s SaaS-based platform, LM Envision, enables observability across on-prem and multi-cloud environments. It provides IT and business teams operational visibility and predictability across their technologies and applications.N/A

    Kaseya Traverse

    Score7 out of 10
    N/ATraverse is a network performance monitoring solution, from Kaseya.N/A
    Pricing
    LogicMonitorKaseya Traverse
    Editions & Modules
    Enterprise
    Contact sales team
    Website Monitoring
    Contact sales team
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    LogicMonitorKaseya Traverse
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsOur platform is broken down into Pro and Enterprise Pricing. Pro includes monitoring for all of your cloud, hybrid, and on-premises infrastructure. Our Enterprise package includes all of this, plus our AIOps and Machine Learning functionality that provides dynamic thresholds, root cause analysis, anomaly detection and more! LogicMonitor only charges by the device. What is considered a device? A device is anything with an IP address that you want to monitor, including a physical device or a cloud resource. This means multiple data sources under the same IP address can be monitored for the same price. Unlike some monitoring platforms. we don’t charge per node, interface, or metric.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    LogicMonitorKaseya Traverse
    Considered Both Products
    LogicMonitor
    Chose LogicMonitor
    This is not an exhaustive list of all products we have previously evaluated. All of these likely have specific use-cases where they would be appropriate choices. In our evaluations, we've felt that LogicMonitor best fit the requirements of our use-case/s than the competition.
    Incentivized
    Chose LogicMonitor
    LogicMonitor is head and shoulders above anything we have used before. Traverse was the most feature-rich, but the back-end was cumbersome and problem-prone. But it was not extensible, support was lacking, and product updates were inconsistent.
    Incentivized
    Chose LogicMonitor
    Nagios and Zabbix, while extremely powerful, flexible, and free/Open Source, are extremely complex to administrator especially in an MSP environment. They aren't so bad as an in-house tool, but for an MSP the amount of resources you'll throw at them to make them function for …
    Incentivized
    Kaseya
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    LogicMonitorKaseya Traverse
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.6
    (170 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    6.7
    (8 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.3
    (29 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.3
    (109 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.8
    (16 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    7.4
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Professional Services
    7.6
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)