Lumar vs. WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Lumar
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
DeepCrawl is a search engine optimization software solution offered by DeepCrawl.N/A
WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
WAVE is a suite of evaluation tools that helps authors make their web content more accessible to individuals with disabilities. WAVE can identify many accessibility and Web Content Accessibility Guideline (WCAG) errors, but also facilitates human evaluation of web content. The vendor, WebAIM who offers WAVE as a free suite of tools, states their philosophy is to focus on issues that they know impact end users, facilitate human evaluation, and to educate about web…
$0.25
per credit
Pricing
LumarWAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
WAVE API Credits 10000+
$0.25
per credit
WAVE API Credits 1000-9999
$0.3
per credit
WAVE API Credits 250-999
$0.4
per credit
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LumarWAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
LumarWAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool
Considered Both Products
Lumar
Chose Lumar
Lumar is great for what it does - tracking technical changes and opportunities for a site. It does so affordably as well. In my opinion it would be best compared to screaming frog as it does essentially the same thing but with less flexibility on the backend and a much cleaner …
Chose Lumar
I feel like they're both pretty similar from my experience, as I have always used the same things. However, I do feel that deepcrawl is easier to use from a UX perspective and I found it easier to get around to find the elements as I required them.
Chose Lumar
Personally I prefer seoClarity's crawler and it's built into their all in one platform.

Deepcrawl has a nice interface though
Chose Lumar
Screaming Frog is somewhat quicker, and I prefer it for issues I need to check up on immediately. But for larger analysis and full site architecture audits, DeepCrawl has a simpler interface and allows for deeper insights without needing to dig around. I appreciate all the …
Chose Lumar
All of the products I have used have been amazing in their own way, but DeepCrawl makes it easier to put it into visuals. Sometimes when you look at results, it can be quite difficult to get something easy to understand. DeepCrawl gets rid of that, the results are so easy to …
Chose Lumar
DeepCrawl is a great tool when compared to other similar solutions. What sets it apart from the competition in my experience with it, is the convenience of the cloud. In addition to having a multitude of tools faced by a digital marketer in today's landscape from analysis of …
WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool
Chose WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool
The other tools would be a little better than WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool. They do require you to pay for their services but offer more support on a daily basis so I would say it would be worth the money. However, I could not go ahead with the websites because they …
Chose WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool
WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool is basic and doesn't go far in depth like Siteimprove or a larger suite. It gives you a great view into exactly where basic issues are on the page, in the HTML and how to fix them. Unlike accessibilitychecker.org, it doesn't try to sell …
Chose WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool
For this, I'm speaking specifically to the Siteimprove browser plugin. The Siteimprove plugin: Allows to filter on guideline level Catches a few more errors than WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool, but comes pretty close But, both do a great job in all other aspects …
Features
LumarWAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool
SEO
Comparison of SEO features of Product A and Product B
Lumar
6.5
Ratings
17% below category average
WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool
-
Ratings
Keyword analysis3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Backlink management2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
SERP ranking tracking8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Page grader10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Competitive analysis5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Site audit / diagnostics10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Site recommendations10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Task management4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
SEO Channels
Comparison of SEO Channels features of Product A and Product B
Lumar
5.8
Ratings
27% below category average
WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool
-
Ratings
Local SEO6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Social SEO3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile SEO4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Global SEO10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
SEO Platform & Account Management
Comparison of SEO Platform & Account Management features of Product A and Product B
Lumar
9.0
Ratings
6% above category average
WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool
-
Ratings
Multi-domain support9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with web analytics tools9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Accessibility Testing
Comparison of Accessibility Testing features of Product A and Product B
Lumar
-
Ratings
WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool
5.7
Ratings
17% below category average
Accessibility Scanning and Assessment00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Issue Ranking00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Manual Auditing Services00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Compliance Reporting and Tracking00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
HTML and CSS scanning00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Color/Contrast Analysis00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
LumarWAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool
Small Businesses
Nozzle
Nozzle
Score 10.0 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Advanced Web Ranking
Advanced Web Ranking
Score 8.2 out of 10
Siteimprove
Siteimprove
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Dupli Checker (DupliChecker.com)
Dupli Checker (DupliChecker.com)
Score 8.5 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
LumarWAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
LumarWAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool
Likelihood to Recommend
It is useful for our clients to help identify where there are any issues and what improvements should be made. We are able to use all the counts of each elements to work out which to prioritise and create an action plan for our clients. If a team isn't able to implement any of the insights from within this tool, then it probably wouldn't be worth the money
Read full review
This is pretty middle of the road. It does a good job of picking out some of the low-hanging fruit, but it's not going properly evaluate semantic structure and will pop several false positives. Additionally, the tools are incomplete. For instance, the contrast editor will allow you to test your colors with sliders so you can get the closest color that passes; however, that isn't how color palettes work, you generally don't get to change a companies palette without a lot of pain; furthermore, there is no ability to adjust the font-size and both font-size AND color are used to determine contrast requirements. Oh, and they use points VS pixels...nobody is using points on the web even if the ADA uses them in their fairly dated guidelines. Text from the actual contrast editor "Text is present that has a contrast ratio less than 4.5:1, or large text (larger than 18 point or 14 point bold) has a contrast ratio less than 3:1.". 14pt = 18.66 pixels, so I can see their logic even if I don't agree with it
Read full review
Pros
  • GUI, when you run a crawl, the response is epic. It isn't just results, the results are very easy to understand.
  • Again, as pertaining to the explanation above. If you use other crawl software, it can be difficult to get insights, whereas DeepCrawl makes it easy. You can get proper insights.
  • It is so easy to put your stamp on things. DeepCrawl gives you an option as a consultant that you might not have had before, it is your backup.
Read full review
  • Creates a great visual display of where the error is located, both in HTML source and page view.
  • An excellent option in the contrast checker is to select the color slider to locate a color that will pass accessible.
  • Clearly displays the alt text of images to check that it makes sense and is accurate
  • Great at indicating if an error is visually hidden but in the code.
  • Clean, organized, easy-to-understand details report
Read full review
Cons
  • Sitemap generating time often takes a few hours depending on how large your site is
  • I would like to have more suggestions to guide optimization efforts
  • Some of the initial setup for crawlers does take time
Read full review
  • Help provide you to resources to fix your website
  • Have the website look a little more detailed, it is very plain
  • Have people that work to help you make changes to your website
Read full review
Usability
It's great once you know how to use it... That being said there can definitely be some hiccups trying to learn the program. Even when writing this review i originally gave it an 8 and realized how many things I didn't even know existed after using it for a couple of years. Not the best 'usability' if you can't even find all the features you might want to use.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I liked the platform overall. It is a good crawler. I no longer use because it's duplicate of what I get with seoClarity. I did not give it 10/10 because sometimes I had a hard time isolating site areas that I wanted and didn't get much technical support from Conductor on how to use the tool
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Lumar is great for what it does - tracking technical changes and opportunities for a site. It does so affordably as well. In my opinion it would be best compared to Screaming Frog as it does essentially the same thing but with less flexibility on the backend and a much cleaner UI that doesn't take as much learning. But also not quite as powerful and not as adjustable for your specific needs as Screaming Frog. So give and take!
Read full review
The other tools would be a little better than WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool. They do require you to pay for their services but offer more support on a daily basis so I would say it would be worth the money. However, I could not go ahead with the websites because they don't work with websites created on GoDaddy Managed Websites and I had to go with WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The price of the tool compared to the amount of time it saves me is a staggering number.
  • With DeepCrawl I can leave no stone unturned, which helps establish Agency credibility with clients.
Read full review
  • Boosted accessibility on pages and page content across our websites
  • Allowed us to easily audit content hosted by others
  • Given us a method of requiring partners/vendors to meet basic accessibility standards.
Read full review
ScreenShots