ManageEngine OpManager vs. Zabbix

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ManageEngine OpManager
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
ManageEngine's OpManager is network performance monitoring software.
$245
for 10 devices
Zabbix
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Zabbix is an open-source network performance monitoring software. It includes prebuilt official and community-developed templates for integrating with networks, applications, and endpoints, and can automate some monitoring processes.N/A
Pricing
ManageEngine OpManagerZabbix
Editions & Modules
Standard Edition
$245
for 10 devices
Professional Edition
$345
for 10 devices
Enterprise Edition
11,545
for 250 devices
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ManageEngine OpManagerZabbix
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup Fee$245 per installationNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ManageEngine OpManagerZabbix
Considered Both Products
ManageEngine OpManager
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
it is great. Not opensource. Ours was run by a 3rd party provider who had their own version of nmap. The setup and use is simple and get tons of output in reports and alerts. I would like to get more use of this product as I learn more about it
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
We have an existing relationship with Manage Engine.
Manage engine was a better product in comparison with the other products. It has as option to have addons like network configuration Manager, Firewall log analyzer, switch port mapper, Ip address manager and packet analyzer.
M…
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
Compared to the Solarwinds products ManageEngine OpManager is much easier to configure and use. It's also vastly cheaper!

Something like the Solarwinds suite of applications is incredibly complicated and difficult to configure. ManageEngine OpManager is very straightforward to …
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
ManageEngine OpManager is very easy to manage and easy to scale, and the GUI is far better than all available products in the market. We can have a single dashboard of all offerings of ManageEngine OpManager and they can be distributed through role-based access for monitoring …
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
ManageEngine OpManager is more user-friendly and easy to use. It is all on your screen to set up and organize. The service logs monitor could display over a month of performance history, and you can make reports for each of the services, which others cannot do. The 3D viewer, …
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
ManageEngine OpManager is faster, not bloated, and less expensive. Wins in every category in my opinion.
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
We have been using ManageEngine Opmanager for quite a long time, I'm not aware if the company was using other products before I joined.
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
We found ManageEngine OpManager easier to plan, implement, and train our team.
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
ManageEngine stands out effectively when compared to ControlUp monitoring solutions, mainly due to distinct architectural differences. One key advantage is its versatile deployment options, including
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
1. inhouse deployment using ManageEngine OpManager is easy and possible, but site24x7 has cloud based monitoring 2. We use both tools but ManageEngine OpManager is user friendly 3. it has free version up to 10 devices to monitor 4. Always available and very less updates …
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
OpManager teams' technical support was excellent. They helped us throughout the implementation - from the initial discovery phase. It is also very easy to use. Our Infrastructure team was able to use it with minimal training.
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
OpManager's straightforward license policy simplifies our product selection process significantly. This clarity enables us to make informed decisions aligned with our business needs, facilitating efficient budgeting and resource allocation. The transparent licensing structure …
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
OpManager is the best solution between all the vendors we reviewed. When completing your request for proposal, be specific as possible with your expectations and needs. Ensure the vendor you select is the correct fit. OpManager selected all the check boxes for our …
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
A hardware monitor is a software application used for hardware health monitoring. Hardware monitor software can collect a wide range of information related to hardware health, including CPU, temperature, and fan speed.
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
OpManager, compared to other platforms, is much cheaper, compared to performance and performance, it has the same characteristics as other tools and is quite fast compared to its market competitors. The sensors it has are useful at the level of network equipment, although it …
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
more accurate with great GUI + it agentless
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
Reliable with almost no false positives at all
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
I think for the price this product offers much more. Maybe not as pretty but certainly is feature rich with the ability to add and manage multiple device brands (Cisco, Cisco Meraki, Fortinet, Palo) in an easy to use and very customizable interface. You can get as deep as you …
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
Before implementing ME OpManager, I used the Nagios Core monitoring system. When choosing OpManager, we also considered other options. One option was to stay with Nagios. Other monitoring systems we considered were Zabbix and op5 Monitor. The advantage of Opmanager was based on …
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
ManageEngine OpManager is the best, most suitable Network Device Monitoring solution I have used. It is straightforward to setup, configure, administrate and tailor. It also has a very good UI and a comprehensive device Template repository.
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
ManageEngine OpManager provides us with the same functionality, the web UI performs better and the price is much less. Support is quick to respond to any issues and the community also has a lot of great information and people willing to help and share their experiences and …
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
Main reason to select ManageEngine was price/performance ratio. Another reason was great coverage of monitoring of different technologies and modules: network devices of various vendors, network modules like NCM, NFA, support for monitoring of vmware virtualisation , citrix …
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
During our competitive analysis, we found ManageEngine OpManager was not expensive compared to other vendors. At the same time, there was no compromise on the features such as customized reporting or configuring alerts per our clientele's unique requirements. These are our …
Zabbix
Chose Zabbix
The software's I mentioned are great, but they are overpriced comparing to Zabbix while it's a free open-source application. The value its adding has high price than any other free open-source apps. the monitoring and alerts details and the friendly user interface is stacking …
Chose Zabbix
As I have mentioned before, its free, open source, very customizable and easy to use.
I think anybody with minimum networking or computer knowledge can watch tutorials and implement this solution easily.
Also it has great community support and forums
Chose Zabbix
Zabbix has no financial cost, PRTG is very expensive but just as impressive capability wise.
Chose Zabbix
Zabbix is very easy to configure and this tool provides a more active alert system. We have evaluated ipMonitor and CloudWatch but the scope for sending alerts is very limited and this tool is very efficient in sending alerts through emails, MS Teams, and even on SMS. We are …
Chose Zabbix
We're using the Solarwinds suite as our global monitoring standard, but it is very complex and its licensing model makes it difficult to monitor a wide range of technologies. So, we're using Zabbix as a complement on our monitoring process.
Zabbix is a way more flexible and has …
Chose Zabbix
It's much easier to get the trained specialists that have experience with this tool in our country.
Chose Zabbix
We're using Munin in parallel to Zabbix, mostly out of legacy reasons. While Munin in the version used here only allows static graphs through image-files, Zabbix clearly wins here with the option to zoom in and out.
I used Nagios many years ago and it was quite similar to …
Chose Zabbix
Although we still use Cisco Prime for network devices, when comparing Zabbix with Nagios, for example, you see that Zabbix is more robust, stable, easy to deploy and has an enterprise focus that other tools don't have. Also, the fact that the Zabbix community is very active is …
Chose Zabbix
Most of the SolarWinds are separated out, whereas Zabbix includes templates and capabilities for all of them out of the box. Other solutions listed include most or all of them to varying degrees as well.

New Relic is more for Application Monitoring, but the New Relic …
Chose Zabbix
Zabbix was adopted in our framework due to the value, the hardware requirements, the knowledge we had available and the vast documentation on the internet.
Chose Zabbix
Zabbix is a great, free solution. While not everything is discovered and configured out of the box, it is a powerful tool that allows for complete customization to what your organization needs as far as a monitoring solution. We've invested the time to make Zabbix powerful, …
Chose Zabbix
Zabbix was much better at handling traditional systems, and in ease of customization, both in the system itself, and customizing data sources, such as adding deep MySQL or JMX integrations. It's very good for organizing large-scale (hundreds or thousands of servers) systems; …
Chose Zabbix
I personally prefer Zabbix over any other monitoring software that I have ever tried. Zabbix is so customizable that if there is a feature I need, I can easily implement it. I can then add that feature to a template in no time and have it applied to hundreds, or even thousands, …
Chose Zabbix
More extensive and customizable than SaaS solutions. Much less learning curve than Nagios. Cost is very much lower than SaaS monitoring especially at scales over 1000 hosts ($15,000/month for SaaS!!) Templating systems allows for easy management and monitoring of groups of …
Chose Zabbix
Zabbix is cost effective maybe and certainly a good tool but not the best. The other ones have features that Zabbix is missing and we use couple of them.
Chose Zabbix
Zabbix had the best support for the devices I initially had in my network, its ability to adapt and change has made it my Swiss Army knife of monitoring tools. While it could benefit greatly from a moderated zabbix community, its support from the open source community has …
Chose Zabbix
Nagios has some advantages over Zabbix like "flapping" detection and multiple alert levels - Error, Warning and OK.
However, the disadvantages of Nagios like needing an addon (NRPE) to monitor remote system internals (open files, running processes, memory, etc), no charting of …
Chose Zabbix
Nagios will always be at or near the top, but I really like how sleek Zabbix is. Also, once it's up and running its really helps keep things in order for you and your customers. As for PandoraFMS, it would have beat out Zabbix, but the documentation on PandoraFMS is really …
Chose Zabbix
The choice was made about 6 years ago, but nothing recent has called that into question. I don't really remember the details of the original choice.
Chose Zabbix
I have had feedback that Splunk is a more out-of-the-box solution. With some fine tuning, it is possible to get the same robust functionality from a Logstash and Zabbix integration. The setup is more taxing, but you avoid paying the costly Splunk fees. So it all really depends …
Chose Zabbix
I'm mostly familiar with Zabbix, but I've also started working with OpenNMS more recently. It appears that they're very comparable, the major difference being that OpenNMS supports SNMP Traps natively and can import MIBs which I was never able to figure out with Zabbix. Like …
Chose Zabbix
Well, I am not a decision-maker here, but I believe Zabbix has been adopted as a default choice to be integrated with Nokia OpenStack because of its simplicity of usage & other products were not matured at that time. Single GUI can be used for infrastructure as well as workload …
Features
ManageEngine OpManagerZabbix
Network Performance Monitoring
Comparison of Network Performance Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
ManageEngine OpManager
8.8
Ratings
7% above category average
Zabbix
-
Ratings
Automated network device discovery8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Network monitoring9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Baseline threshold calculation8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Alerts9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Network capacity planning8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Packet capture analysis8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Network mapping8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable reports8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Wireless infrastructure monitoring8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Hardware health monitoring9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ManageEngine OpManagerZabbix
Small Businesses
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.0 out of 10
ConnectWise Automate
ConnectWise Automate
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Icinga
Icinga
Score 7.8 out of 10
Enterprises
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
Score 9.0 out of 10
LogicMonitor
LogicMonitor
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ManageEngine OpManagerZabbix
Likelihood to Recommend
7.4
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.1
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.1
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ManageEngine OpManagerZabbix
Likelihood to Recommend
OpManager offers a set of advantages that allow it to adapt to the needs of the company, guaranteeing effective monitoring of the application networks used in our organization. It has an intuitive and easy-to-use interface. The initial setup went smoothly and in a decent amount of time.
Read full review
Because we spread out in different locations, we can't always know the status of our devices. Zabbix solves this issue for us. As soon as we see an alert that the remote site is down, we can solve it right away. I can't think of a scenario where it was less appropriate for us.
Read full review
Pros
  • We changed our RDP port to a non-standard port and monitor servers by that instead of a simple ping. Systems that are busted will still respond to pings.
  • The dashboard shows us any drives that are almost full. We check this when we do our monthly maintenance.
  • Monitoring Windows services and event log events and sending notifications when things don't behave as expected.
Read full review
  • Alerts; Zabbix allows deep customization of conditions and alerts giving you the ability to perform nearly any scripted action in a variety of scenarios
  • Inventory; having one place to see a list of all on-going problems and list of servers within your organization is critical
  • Graphs; screens or graphs showing customizable and color-coded historical usage is a necessity in any monitoring software
Read full review
Cons
  • Adding devices to existing groups and applying a group-wide parameter.
  • Email alerts can be a bit challenging depending on how email is managed within a company, sometimes adding ManageEngine OpManager to the allowed relay list for Exchange is necessary to receive any alerts
Read full review
  • Creating an alert & its trigger can be made easier.
  • More VM-based data collection counters should be introduced to have better VM monitoring.
  • The raw counters collection agent in every node is relatively weak. It goes down often, which needs more stability.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
This product works very well for our organization, and it would be hard to not have a tool like this going forward
Read full review
It is free. It didn't cost anything to implement (other than my time and the cost incurred for it) and it is filling a badly needed gap in our IT infrastructure. Support is available if we have issues and can be done annually or paid for on a per incident basis as needed. Expansion, updates, and all other future lifecycle activities are likewise free of cost, so as long as someone is able to implement/maintain the software (and the OSS project is maintained) then I imagine the company will never leave it.
Read full review
Usability
The rating I provided is based on the product quality, experience (I have been using OpManager for almost the last 4 years), and relevance of the information/response I generated through Manage Engine OpManager. I have also received good support from OpManager.
Read full review
Well i find the tool quite useful for my daily network monitoring purpose. We get the alerts easily through SMS which saves us lot of our times and effort. The tool is highly customizable which i mentioned earlier which helps to create different alert criteria for different device or system.
Read full review
Support Rating
At first, we were not able to add our Avaya switches to the configuration backup module, our partner tried to help, but they did not find the solution, we had one remote session with tech support of ME and they solve the problem.
Read full review
The setup is the most time-consuming portion of using zabbix. It takes a lot of effort to shape it into a usable format and even then it can get very messy. It's not exactly intuitive and as mentioned the UI seems a bit antiquated. If I was to roll out a monitoring solution from scratch, I'd probably look for alternatives which are easier to use and maintain.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
We are a mainly Windows environment, so it would be useful if we could have used Active Directory to deploy agents. As of version 4.2, Zabbix has announced a new agent MSI file to allow exactly that. Unfortunately, we didn't have that option. Also, for Linux and MAC deployments, there is no simple way to deploy that. Using remote scripts you may be able to create something, but most places will opt for either SNMP (agentless) or manual installation of agents to add to Zabbix. A way of deploying agents via discovery would go a long way to helping in the adoption of the tool.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We have an existing relationship with Manage Engine. Manage engine was a better product in comparison with the other products. It has as option to have addons like network configuration Manager, Firewall log analyzer, switch port mapper, Ip address manager and packet analyzer. Manage engine has an excellent customer support who are always available and response is quick
Read full review
The software's I mentioned are great, but they are overpriced comparing to Zabbix while it's a free open-source application. The value its adding has high price than any other free open-source apps. the monitoring and alerts details and the friendly user interface is stacking up against any other apps in the web.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • ROI has very much increased as we are able to fix issues in a faster manner.
  • Monitoring for system administrators has become easy using ManageEngine OpManager getting a centralized view.
  • Alerts are helping during odd hours where manual intervention is not possible.
Read full review
  • Zabbix has had a positive impact on uptime of our external facing website. Users don't always call up our Customer Service team to report that something is down - sometimes they just abandon the website all together. By having a monitoring solution that tells us when things are down before customers do, we are able to respond quickly and avoid losing visitors and ultimately sales.
Read full review
ScreenShots

ManageEngine OpManager Screenshots

Screenshot of OpManager's DashboardScreenshot of OpManager's realtime graphsScreenshot of a device snapshot page in OpManagerScreenshot of Alarms in OpManager