Zabbix

Zabbix

182 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Zabbix	Score8.6 out of 10	N/A	Zabbix is an open-source network performance monitoring software. It includes prebuilt official and community-developed templates for integrating with networks, applications, and endpoints, and can automate some monitoring processes.	N/A

Pricing

Zabbix

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
Zabbix
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

No setup fee

—

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	Zabbix
Considered Both Products	Zabbix Verified User Chose Zabbix The software's I mentioned are great, but they are overpriced comparing to Zabbix while it's a free open-source application. The value its adding has high price than any other free open-source apps. the monitoring and alerts details and the friendly user interface is stacking … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Zabbix As I have mentioned before, its free, open source, very customizable and easy to use. I think anybody with minimum networking or computer knowledge can watch tutorials and implement this solution easily. Also it has great community support and forums Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Zabbix Zabbix has no financial cost, PRTG is very expensive but just as impressive capability wise. Incentivized Helpful? Umair Mehboob Senior Devops Engineer in Information Technology at iENGINEERING (Information Technology & Services, 51-200 employees) Chose Zabbix Zabbix is very easy to configure and this tool provides a more active alert system. We have evaluated ipMonitor and CloudWatch but the scope for sending alerts is very limited and this tool is very efficient in sending alerts through emails, MS Teams, and even on SMS. We are … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Zabbix We're using the Solarwinds suite as our global monitoring standard, but it is very complex and its licensing model makes it difficult to monitor a wide range of technologies. So, we're using Zabbix as a complement on our monitoring process. Zabbix is a way more flexible and has … Incentivized Helpful? Faustine Chisasa Network Engineer in Engineering at Tanzania Telecommunications Corporation (Telecommunications, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Zabbix Zabbix is more flexible, highly customizable and low on resource usage. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Zabbix It's much easier to get the trained specialists that have experience with this tool in our country. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Zabbix We're using Munin in parallel to Zabbix, mostly out of legacy reasons. While Munin in the version used here only allows static graphs through image-files, Zabbix clearly wins here with the option to zoom in and out. I used Nagios many years ago and it was quite similar to … Incentivized Helpful? Eduardo Viero IT Infrastructure Specialist in Information Technology at RANDON S.A (Automotive, 5001-10,000 employees) Chose Zabbix Although we still use Cisco Prime for network devices, when comparing Zabbix with Nagios, for example, you see that Zabbix is more robust, stable, easy to deploy and has an enterprise focus that other tools don't have. Also, the fact that the Zabbix community is very active is … Incentivized Helpful? Thomas Higgins Infrastructure Engineer in Information Technology at Matthews International (Internet, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Zabbix Most of the SolarWinds are separated out, whereas Zabbix includes templates and capabilities for all of them out of the box. Other solutions listed include most or all of them to varying degrees as well. New Relic is more for Application Monitoring, but the New Relic … Incentivized Helpful? Ricardo Melo Network Analyst in Information Technology at Aloo Telecom (Telecommunications, 201-500 employees) Chose Zabbix Zabbix was adopted in our framework due to the value, the hardware requirements, the knowledge we had available and the vast documentation on the internet. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Zabbix Zabbix is a great, free solution. While not everything is discovered and configured out of the box, it is a powerful tool that allows for complete customization to what your organization needs as far as a monitoring solution. We've invested the time to make Zabbix powerful, … Incentivized Helpful? Steve Mushero CEO in Information Technology at OpsStack (Internet, 51-200 employees) Chose Zabbix Zabbix was much better at handling traditional systems, and in ease of customization, both in the system itself, and customizing data sources, such as adding deep MySQL or JMX integrations. It's very good for organizing large-scale (hundreds or thousands of servers) systems; … Incentivized Helpful? Eric O'Callaghan Linux Engineer in Information Technology at Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals (Entertainment, 10,001+ employees) Chose Zabbix I personally prefer Zabbix over any other monitoring software that I have ever tried. Zabbix is so customizable that if there is a feature I need, I can easily implement it. I can then add that feature to a template in no time and have it applied to hundreds, or even thousands, … Incentivized Helpful? Josh Quint Lead AWS Systems Architect in Information Technology at Turing Group (Computer Software, 11-50 employees) Chose Zabbix More extensive and customizable than SaaS solutions. Much less learning curve than Nagios. Cost is very much lower than SaaS monitoring especially at scales over 1000 hosts ($15,000/month for SaaS!!) Templating systems allows for easy management and monitoring of groups of … Incentivized Helpful? Nishanthi Mohan DevOps Engineer in Information Technology at FICO (Computer Software, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Zabbix Zabbix is cost effective maybe and certainly a good tool but not the best. The other ones have features that Zabbix is missing and we use couple of them. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Zabbix Zabbix had the best support for the devices I initially had in my network, its ability to adapt and change has made it my Swiss Army knife of monitoring tools. While it could benefit greatly from a moderated zabbix community, its support from the open source community has … Incentivized Helpful? Deepshikha Gandhi DevOps Engineer in Engineering at Magnetic (Computer Software, 201-500 employees) Chose Zabbix Nagios has some advantages over Zabbix like "flapping" detection and multiple alert levels - Error, Warning and OK. However, the disadvantages of Nagios like needing an addon (NRPE) to monitor remote system internals (open files, running processes, memory, etc), no charting of … Incentivized Helpful? Nadir Wade Linux Administrator in Information Technology at Rackspace, the #1 managed cloud company (Information Technology and Services, 11-50 employees) Chose Zabbix Nagios will always be at or near the top, but I really like how sleek Zabbix is. Also, once it's up and running its really helps keep things in order for you and your customers. As for PandoraFMS, it would have beat out Zabbix, but the documentation on PandoraFMS is really … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Zabbix The choice was made about 6 years ago, but nothing recent has called that into question. I don't really remember the details of the original choice. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Zabbix I have had feedback that Splunk is a more out-of-the-box solution. With some fine tuning, it is possible to get the same robust functionality from a Logstash and Zabbix integration. The setup is more taxing, but you avoid paying the costly Splunk fees. So it all really depends … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Zabbix I'm mostly familiar with Zabbix, but I've also started working with OpenNMS more recently. It appears that they're very comparable, the major difference being that OpenNMS supports SNMP Traps natively and can import MIBs which I was never able to figure out with Zabbix. Like … Incentivized Helpful? Asad Khan Technical CARE Specialist in Engineering at Nokia (Telecommunications, 10,001+ employees) Chose Zabbix Well, I am not a decision-maker here, but I believe Zabbix has been adopted as a default choice to be integrated with Nokia OpenStack because of its simplicity of usage & other products were not matured at that time. Single GUI can be used for infrastructure as well as workload … Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic

User Ratings
	Zabbix
Likelihood to Recommend	8.3 (28 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	9.0 (3 ratings)
Usability	8.6 (4 ratings)
Support Rating	5.0 (5 ratings)
Implementation Rating	8.0 (2 ratings)