Hexnode UEM vs. ManageEngine Endpoint Central

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Hexnode UEM
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Hexnode is a Unified Endpoint Management solution from Mitsogo Inc. that aims to simplify the way people work with the help of intelligent tools. The management platform streamlines the device lifecycle model to offer its support at every stage, from device onboarding to the end of its life. It also gives a hands-free experience with automatic enrollment using Zero-touch enrollment, Knox Mobile Enrollment, and ABM and endpoint management with the help of dynamic group allocation in…
$2.40
per month per device
ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Desktop Central from ManageEngine is a client desktop management with patching, remote control, and configuration.N/A
Pricing
Hexnode UEMManageEngine Endpoint Central
Editions & Modules
Pro
$2.40
per month per device
Enterprise
$3.60
per month per device
Ultimate
$5.20
per month per device
Ultra
Contact Hexnode for a Quote
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Hexnode UEMManageEngine Endpoint Central
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsNo support costs, No maintenance charges. Per device pricing. Discount available for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Hexnode UEMManageEngine Endpoint Central
Considered Both Products
Hexnode UEM
Chose Hexnode UEM
We previously utilized Miradore MDM for all of our tablets and management. We have since made the switch to Hexnode UEM and are migrating all of our tablets to it instead. We have saved money with this switch and we have been able to easily remove our tablets from Miradore and …
Chose Hexnode UEM
I am currently using both the platforms, Hexnode UEM and Esper. Esper is used for managing mobile devices and Lenovo Tablets while Hexnode UEM is being used for Microsoft tablets. The basic framework behind both of them is almost the same. Both of them have a clean and …
Chose Hexnode UEM
Far better than Drata because the Drata solution felt like an MVP (minimum viable product). Comparatively you can do tons more with Hexnode UEM at a comparable price point. Drata did however did have broader OS support, but Drata's lack of configurability left it as only a …
Chose Hexnode UEM
Several UEMs enable kiosks, and Hexnode's customizing options are unmatched. For instance, we may entirely redesign the smartphone, starting with the lock screen and home screen backgrounds, to include your brand and company logo. The customer support they provide are also a …
Chose Hexnode UEM
The tech support and the customization of the features they provided are great. Along with the BYOD help they provided helped manage the devices during the COVID lockdown with ease.
Chose Hexnode UEM
The ease of management of the devices with Hexnode was great.
It was extremely easy to use and easy to understand for the team.
The customer support they provided great as well.
Chose Hexnode UEM
We also looked into ZOHO Mobile Engine.
Chose Hexnode UEM
We were in the market for a solution that would reduce the workload on our client and the initial choice was Scalefusion; however, on getting a free trial, the UI wasn't that easy to use, and Scalefusion seemed like a smaller company which is new to endpoint management. Whereas …
Chose Hexnode UEM
Mobileiron was very expensive in comparison to Hexnode UEM
Chose Hexnode UEM
Hexnode UEM offers a better solution at a lower price than scalefusion MDM
Chose Hexnode UEM
We tried Jamf Pro for the same but the UI looked a bit dated and while Jamf is a more established product, it did not have multi-OS support which was one of our primary requirements. Hexnode on the other hand had a smoother UI and offered a better value for the money spent.
Chose Hexnode UEM
Google MDM did not have the kiosk lockdown mechanism like Hexnode so went with Hexnode and it turned out really well!
Chose Hexnode UEM
ManageEngine was confusing and hard to get support from, in my experience. We use other products from ManageEngine and it is always a headache to get a hold of them. Hexnode UEM is two clicks and you are talking to someone on their live chat pretty much all day. ManageEngine …
ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
ManageEngine Endpoint Central was easier to use and more cost effective in the long run. It also provided a great integration with Service Desk Plus under one umbrella of products.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
I had already used SCCM in other companies, but when I joined the company I'm currently in, I started using Endpoint Central and I've been incredibly satisfied with the service and support.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
We did not use ManageEngine Endpoint Central over intune specifically, we run the solutions in parallel. This is ideal, as intune allows surface devices to be shipped and enrolled (no imaging, PXE or any intervention needed) The huge advantage of intune is we can ship the …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
I chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central because it allows me to update devices, deploy configurations, install software, remotely patch, and monitor vulnerabilities.

Elegi ManageEngine Endpoint Central porque me permite actualizar equipos, desplegar configuraciones, instalar …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
While some of these other Windows MDM solutions had some small improvements for something ManageEngine Endpoint Central does not have, I still find that ManageEngine Endpoint Central still has the biggest library, if you will, for functionality.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Splunk Enterprise, ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus and Cybereason Managed Detection & Response (MDR)
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
It is overall better, locally deployed accessed via agent
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
more user friendly and superior documentation
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
It holds up very well even against the microsoft native solution Microsoft Intune.
The Configurations are easy to set up and apply quickly over the selected scope of Clients.
You have a almost real time inventory of everything detected by the agent.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
I tend to use a combination of solutions to keep the estate running efficiently. ManageEngine Endpoint Central has more control over the timing of patching for users. Juggling users being able to work and keeping systems up to date with user satisfaction in mind is a monthly …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Easier to implement, the agent can be deployed faster, the agent consumes fewer system resources. (TR)
Einfacher zu implementieren, der Agent lässt sich schneller ausrollen, der Agent verbraucht weniger Systemressourcen
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Its can always be integrated with ManageEngine other products, which is very useful.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Dollar for dollar, ManageEngine seems to be the most bang for your buck self-hosted solution. NinjaOne is cloud deployment only which can really add up over time, and KACE while better for scripting and asset management charges a premium for all of the extra modules that are …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
They have no point of comparison
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
The reporting on scripts is far better in ManageEngine, always showing the latest result. Unlike Intune which can run a script every day, but the "Report" only shows the result from the first time the script ran, it never refreshes. When we have had issues where the LAPS …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Other product like XCitium does not do USB block and is more pricier.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Compared to other product, cost, feature and easy management is main criteria to select ManageEngine Endpoint Central.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Ease of use
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Much better patching capabilities
Best Alternatives
Hexnode UEMManageEngine Endpoint Central
Small Businesses
Avast CloudCare
Avast CloudCare
Score 10.0 out of 10
Avast CloudCare
Avast CloudCare
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 10.0 out of 10
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 10.0 out of 10
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Hexnode UEMManageEngine Endpoint Central
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.1
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Hexnode UEMManageEngine Endpoint Central
Likelihood to Recommend
Hexnode was best suited for us to manage android devices and more specifically for Kiosk Lockdown and restrictions. Hexnode being a UEM offers support for platforms as well. It certainly does open doors for us to increase and take up more devices under the management of Hexnode. As said earlier, Hexnode does not support wearables as of now; would be great if they could start supporting them soon.
Read full review
Patch management is a HUGE time saver. Simply being able to push patches out to devices without having to physically go around to each one save a ton of time. Inventory tracking has also helped us better manage equipment. We are all human and make mistakes, and this helps to eliminate or catch many of those mistakes. With ManageEngine Endpoint Central scans showing us who is using the device and what else is plugged into it, saves us from having to search for devices when they are being refreshed.
Read full review
Pros
  • Setting mandatory applications and the silent installation of enterprise apps.
  • Hexnode integrates with the Apple Device Enrollment Program and Apple Volume Purchase Program, enabling bulk software purchases and device enrollment.
  • Blocklisted applications would be uninstalled from the device and would not be available for download again.
Read full review
  • It helps to facilitate the administration of a network of workstations and servers.
  • The deployment of applications and updates is very easy to implement, and greatly facilitates keeping workstations and servers up to date.
  • The commissioning of the solution is very simple, and with the help of the external gateway, it allows for the supervision of all equipment, as long as they have internet access.
  • We can manage multiple mobile fleets, with user smartphones on one side and industrial smartphones with specific missions on the other. The possibility of applying a kiosk mode is not negligible.
Read full review
Cons
  • We utilize a small number of Windows devices in addition to Android ones, however, Hexnode UEM has very few Windows-specific restrictions compared to those for other platforms.
  • When we turned on the remote control, the Hexnode for Work app would periodically crash.
  • We had to get in touch with their tech support to resolve the issue because the Multi app kiosk mode for Windows devices was not correctly pushed.
Read full review
  • Better remote access, sometimes manage engine will not be running in services and I can't remote in.
  • Pop-up when I'm trying to work, no I don't want to learn about a new feature while trying to solve an emergency.
  • Hard to onboard a computer if it doesn't automatically go.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It works exactly as needed, no need to find another solution.
Read full review
Given these factors, organizations would individually assess their experience with Endpoint Central to determine its renewal likelihood. If you're considering renewal, it might be helpful to gather feedback from users within your organization, review performance metrics, and assess how well Endpoint Central aligns with your current and future endpoint management needs.
Read full review
Usability
UX is pretty good, but various screens are a bit redundant. Managing user and managing devices is often one in the same operation, but is broken across multiple screens. Device management policies are strange because if you make a "macOS" policy, why does it have all the Windows, iOS, Android etc options? It's unlikely you'll want all of these options for all possible OSes in one policy, but that's the only way to build a policy. Manage policy changes require remote system restart which is highly disruptive to employees.
Read full review
The application itself is great. However, I have little insight to what the patches are doing. Being able to see patch download progress, not just the status, would be great. The user interface could also use an overhaul. The countless menus, sometimes containing similar if not duplicate tabs can be frustrating to navigate.
Read full review
Support Rating
Online chat support is the best I have received from my vendors.
Read full review
The immediate chat support is great and very helpful. However, if you need escalated support or have a deeper need that the chat tool can't help with, you will experience significant wait times and slow responses. The time zone difference becomes painful to the point of often just giving up.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Follow the steps, and it will install very easy.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We previously utilized Miradore MDM for all of our tablets and management. We have since made the switch to Hexnode UEM and are migrating all of our tablets to it instead. We have saved money with this switch and we have been able to easily remove our tablets from Miradore and set them up within Hexnode UEM instead.
Read full review
Kaseya's system of handling patch management was not as intuitive as Endpoint Central, however in some respects it was easier to set up. Kaseya VSA and ConnectWise are also more geared towards managed service providers that handle multiple organizations versus a single company's IT department, which Endpoint Central seems more designed for. Intune, while helpful for machine management, does not have the level of overall endpoint management and inventory management and is better used alongside another endpoint management tool
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We already had someone try to walk away with an ipad after deploying Hexnode, and we were immediately able to force an activation lock telling them to bring it back and they did.
  • It has saved us a lot of time setting up ios devices as we have a limited amount of IT staff and Hexnode makes it take probably around ten minutes an ipad.
  • Employee experience has improved since we can reset code remotely and they no longer have to send the ipads back to the corporate office to get reset.
Read full review
  • We have been able resolve and complete any requests which include things like software deployment or issues that include troubleshooting, much faster and more efficiently. This has had a sharp decrease in our response times and also time it takes to complete these requests or incidents.
  • The mobile device management features have allowed us to be able to have a much tighter grip on security. This means we have dramtically decreased our device vulnerabilities and risk of data breaches. This has saved us lots of time and money.
  • The remote features that are available have helped a lot with user's being able to work remotely and allow our organisation to sustain hybrid work. It means user's can still be as productive and IT support is as efficient no matter where the user is working.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Hexnode UEM Screenshots

Screenshot of Hexnode UEMScreenshot of Hexnode SolutionsScreenshot of Why choose Hexnode?Screenshot of Hexnode KioskScreenshot of Hexnode Integrations

ManageEngine Endpoint Central Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of