ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs. Microsoft Intune

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Desktop Central from ManageEngine is a client desktop management with patching, remote control, and configuration.N/A
Microsoft Intune
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Intune (formerly Microsoft Endpoint Manager), combining the capabilities of the former Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager, SCCM or ConfigMgr, is presented as a unified endpoint management option. Microsoft Intune is an endpoint management solution for mobile devices, an MDM solution that allows the user to securely manage iOS, Android, Windows, and macOS devices with a single endpoint management solution. The component Endpoint Configuration Manager (the…
$5
per user/per month
Pricing
ManageEngine Endpoint CentralMicrosoft Intune
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Microsoft 365 Business Basic
$5
per user/per month
Microsoft 365 For Individuals
$6.99
per month
Microsoft 365 Apps
$8.25
per user/per month
Microsoft 365 For Families
$9.99
per month
Microsoft 365 Business Standard
$12.50
per user/per month
Microsoft 365 Business Premium
$15
per user/per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ManageEngine Endpoint CentralMicrosoft Intune
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ManageEngine Endpoint CentralMicrosoft Intune
Considered Both Products
ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
ManageEngine Endpoint Central was easier to use and more cost effective in the long run. It also provided a great integration with Service Desk Plus under one umbrella of products.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
I had already used SCCM in other companies, but when I joined the company I'm currently in, I started using Endpoint Central and I've been incredibly satisfied with the service and support.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
We did not use ManageEngine Endpoint Central over intune specifically, we run the solutions in parallel. This is ideal, as intune allows surface devices to be shipped and enrolled (no imaging, PXE or any intervention needed) The huge advantage of intune is we can ship the …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
I chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central because it allows me to update devices, deploy configurations, install software, remotely patch, and monitor vulnerabilities.

Elegi ManageEngine Endpoint Central porque me permite actualizar equipos, desplegar configuraciones, instalar …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
While some of these other Windows MDM solutions had some small improvements for something ManageEngine Endpoint Central does not have, I still find that ManageEngine Endpoint Central still has the biggest library, if you will, for functionality.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Splunk Enterprise, ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus and Cybereason Managed Detection & Response (MDR)
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
It is overall better, locally deployed accessed via agent
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
more user friendly and superior documentation
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
It holds up very well even against the microsoft native solution Microsoft Intune.
The Configurations are easy to set up and apply quickly over the selected scope of Clients.
You have a almost real time inventory of everything detected by the agent.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
I tend to use a combination of solutions to keep the estate running efficiently. ManageEngine Endpoint Central has more control over the timing of patching for users. Juggling users being able to work and keeping systems up to date with user satisfaction in mind is a monthly …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Easier to implement, the agent can be deployed faster, the agent consumes fewer system resources. (TR)
Einfacher zu implementieren, der Agent lässt sich schneller ausrollen, der Agent verbraucht weniger Systemressourcen
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Its can always be integrated with ManageEngine other products, which is very useful.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Dollar for dollar, ManageEngine seems to be the most bang for your buck self-hosted solution. NinjaOne is cloud deployment only which can really add up over time, and KACE while better for scripting and asset management charges a premium for all of the extra modules that are …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
They have no point of comparison
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
The reporting on scripts is far better in ManageEngine, always showing the latest result. Unlike Intune which can run a script every day, but the "Report" only shows the result from the first time the script ran, it never refreshes. When we have had issues where the LAPS …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Other product like XCitium does not do USB block and is more pricier.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Compared to other product, cost, feature and easy management is main criteria to select ManageEngine Endpoint Central.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Ease of use
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Much better patching capabilities
Microsoft Intune
Chose Microsoft Intune
Microsoft Intune fits seamlessly with the other Microsoft products that are installed at our customers. Furthermore, Microsoft Intune has a lot of possibilities and can be used very flexibly. In terms of management, maintenance and rollout, it fits the wishes of our …
Chose Microsoft Intune
Microsoft Intune is more robust as far as fine-tuning security controls. It also allows for software installs, folder access controls, updating PCs, and other features simply not found in previous products we have used. Because it is rolled into MS 365 it's very cost …
Chose Microsoft Intune
We migrated from Skybox to Microsoft Intune because we already owned Intune licensing through our existing Microsoft subscription. Overall, this has reduced costs, increased operating efficiencies, and lead to more streamlined system and process management. It was really a …
Chose Microsoft Intune
A few of our apps get deployed during enrollment, the important ones that are required. For other apps, PDQ makes things a bit quicker as you can hit deploy and it happens instantly. So we use a mix of the two products. If you have a lot of macOS devices, another tool to …
Chose Microsoft Intune
I prefer to go with what is already available from Microsoft to manage my IT infrastructure. My preference is to reduce the number of vendors I have to work with.
Chose Microsoft Intune
Symantec Ghost Solutions only covered only 2 parts, creating and imaging, of what Microsoft Endpoint Protection provided us. Price point wise it was a no brainer for us to switch to it as it covered many other things we were looking for and become an almost all in one solution
Chose Microsoft Intune
We did not evaluate or use other products like Microsoft Endpoint Manager (Microsoft Intune + SCCM). The main reason we did not evaluate or use other products is because Microsoft Endpoint Manager (Microsoft Intune + SCCM) integrates seamlessly with Microsoft 365 and Windows …
Chose Microsoft Intune
Due to work put into getting SCCM up and running, moving to Endpoint Manager was the logical step, without needing to compare to other products and start that development cycle over again. Staying within the Microsoft ecosystem allows our organization to have better-defined …
Chose Microsoft Intune
Not having to invest in Intune and having all the important features its competitors had the choice was very easy to make in favor of Microsoft's product.
Chose Microsoft Intune
[Microsoft Endpoint Manager (Microsoft Intune + SCCM)] was already in our environment when I was hired. We haven't really evaluated the need to use another application because SCCM has been working well for us. Additionally, Microsoft SCCM is the industry-standard when it comes …
Chose Microsoft Intune
SCCM's bread and butter has been imaging, and that still can't be beat. With cloud computing becoming more normal, however, we are seeing fewer instances where we are flat out imaging devices as they come in. However, [Microsoft] Endpoint Manager still [excels] in this area. …
Chose Microsoft Intune
Group policy, the predecessor of Microsoft Endpoint Manager was a great, easy to use tool. It is dated and stuck as an on-prem solution but still very good and served a purpose. We are still using this in conjunction with Microsoft Endpoint Manager whilst we complete our …
Chose Microsoft Intune
We tired other solution which less suite for our needs.
Currently we mostly use MS applications and services so, MS Intune ans SCCM close match our expectation and needs.
We require easy access and top reliability with support for all of our IT platforms.
Chose Microsoft Intune
I haven't used any of the above-mentioned endpoint management solutions but heard about them. I hope they also provide similar functionalities as provided by Intune.
Chose Microsoft Intune
Dell Kace K1000 does a great job of system patching of Applications, Office, and Windows. It does a great job of software deployment. It even has great software for asset and inventory management. It is also a ServiceDesk platform, and if you're not using that function, it can …
Chose Microsoft Intune
Most companies with Office 365 already own Intune. It also heavily integrated with Office 365. Other product users had more issues and limitations. Security features did not work with other vendors, and we spent more time dealing with issues.
Chose Microsoft Intune
SCCM is probably used across the industry more so than most other Systems Management solutions, and the reasoning behind this is most likely because it is a Microsoft product, which integrates well with the Windows Server platform, and also with clients/endpoints that are on …
Chose Microsoft Intune
We selected Microsoft Intune for the ease of use and its integration with the entire Office 365 ecosystem, which allows us to have an end-to-end of the collaborator.
Chose Microsoft Intune
GFI Lan Guard system is not user-friendly. GFI Lan Guard does not produce laptop/computer images in one place and its asset management is not very good. System Center Configuration Manager was built for asset management and therefore able to provide robust inventory management.
S…
Chose Microsoft Intune
Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager is kind of the only option for PC management on a large scale. There are open-source alternatives like Chocolatey, but that only works for very small scale shops. Microsoft kind of monopolizes on this front for enterprise …
Chose Microsoft Intune
We use AD GPO to deploy software, WDS for OS deployment, and Spiceworks for inventory. This solution has significantly reduced feature set compared to SCCM but much easier to troubleshoot and configure. Currently, we are looking into ManageEngine Desktop Central and SmartDeploy …
Chose Microsoft Intune
We were a ZENworks shop previously. With our strong tie to Novell that made sense, but as we left Netware and its enterprise directory it made sense to leave Zenworks. At the time, I would have said that ZENworks was a more mature tool and I haven't kept up with their feature …
Chose Microsoft Intune
I didn't evaluate any other product when we started using SCCM. Because we were under an MS Enterprise agreement, it was easy to decide.
Chose Microsoft Intune
I inherited an already existing environment system center. My previous experience was using WSUS. Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager does still use WSUS but it is a far more robust and complete solution for managing and reporting on all your PCs. Our Microsoft …
Best Alternatives
ManageEngine Endpoint CentralMicrosoft Intune
Small Businesses
Avast CloudCare
Avast CloudCare
Score 10.0 out of 10
Avast CloudCare
Avast CloudCare
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 10.0 out of 10
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 10.0 out of 10
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ManageEngine Endpoint CentralMicrosoft Intune
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.3
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.9
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
6.9
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.8
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ManageEngine Endpoint CentralMicrosoft Intune
Likelihood to Recommend
Patch management is a HUGE time saver. Simply being able to push patches out to devices without having to physically go around to each one save a ton of time. Inventory tracking has also helped us better manage equipment. We are all human and make mistakes, and this helps to eliminate or catch many of those mistakes. With ManageEngine Endpoint Central scans showing us who is using the device and what else is plugged into it, saves us from having to search for devices when they are being refreshed.
Read full review
Windows Autopilot makes provisioning user Windows PC laptops a breeze. A user only needs to turn on the laptop, join it to their local WiFi, login with their O365 account then sit back and let Windows Autopilot handle the app installations required for work, configure the laptop settings to meet my organization requirements. I have seen this all completed in less than 30 minutes depending on how fast the internet connection is. Where Microsoft Intune needs to improve I think is the part where it can push out software updates to 3rd party apps. Right now I have to use Automox to fill in this gap.
Read full review
Pros
  • It helps to facilitate the administration of a network of workstations and servers.
  • The deployment of applications and updates is very easy to implement, and greatly facilitates keeping workstations and servers up to date.
  • The commissioning of the solution is very simple, and with the help of the external gateway, it allows for the supervision of all equipment, as long as they have internet access.
  • We can manage multiple mobile fleets, with user smartphones on one side and industrial smartphones with specific missions on the other. The possibility of applying a kiosk mode is not negligible.
Read full review
  • [Microsoft Endpoint Manager (Microsoft Intune + SCCM)] helps to speed up the deployment of patches/software throughout our environment. I can easily build a package and then deploy across all endpoints.
  • The ability to supercede software is also quite handy. This automates the removal of old versions and replacing them with newer versions.
  • The Intune Autopilot option is very useful if you want to deploy software to devices straight out of the box. You can configure them to download software when a user opens a new PC and turns it on for the first time.
Read full review
Cons
  • Better remote access, sometimes manage engine will not be running in services and I can't remote in.
  • Pop-up when I'm trying to work, no I don't want to learn about a new feature while trying to solve an emergency.
  • Hard to onboard a computer if it doesn't automatically go.
Read full review
  • Installation is very laborious and complicated. The number of things to manually configure during the installation is incredible.
  • OS deployment is hard to configure and troubleshoot. The Microsoft article on deploying Windows 10 via System Center Configuration Manager in a test environment takes 44 minutes to read (Microsoft's estimate, not mine -- check here: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/deployment/windows-10-poc-sc-config-mgr). If something goes wrong, there are multiple log locations to check on both the server and client, making troubleshooting difficult.
  • The management console looks old, and its performance isn't great. It is often hard to find settings in the console, and it refreshes slowly. The old name for System Center Configuration Manager, SMS, comes to mind often. "Slowly Moving Software."
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Given these factors, organizations would individually assess their experience with Endpoint Central to determine its renewal likelihood. If you're considering renewal, it might be helpful to gather feedback from users within your organization, review performance metrics, and assess how well Endpoint Central aligns with your current and future endpoint management needs.
Read full review
Mascom Wireless is a Microsoft shop and SCCM has proved to be helpful in keeping our Microsoft products up to date every month without fail. We also have a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement which we renewed for three years ending 2022. The remote access utility works wonders for the organisation and have saved travel bills including subsistance allowance. We have been able to fulfill security audits both internal and external. We have been able to keep a robust inventory of our computer assets and nothing falls of the cracks
Read full review
Usability
The application itself is great. However, I have little insight to what the patches are doing. Being able to see patch download progress, not just the status, would be great. The user interface could also use an overhaul. The countless menus, sometimes containing similar if not duplicate tabs can be frustrating to navigate.
Read full review
Overall, Microsoft Intune is very usable. While help documentation can be lacking, once setup and configured, Intune does all the work that used to be manual. There is a lot of automation and advanced features and manufacturer integrations you don't get anywhere else. These are absolutely game changers when managing IT workloads.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
It's a 'heavy' system, which demands a lot of resources form the datacenter perspective. So, make sure you followed the requirements to avoid frustration in the future. From the 'client' perspective, it's fine. I've never had any issue with that.
Read full review
Support Rating
The immediate chat support is great and very helpful. However, if you need escalated support or have a deeper need that the chat tool can't help with, you will experience significant wait times and slow responses. The time zone difference becomes painful to the point of often just giving up.
Read full review
Being a Microsoft product, support was good. Out interaction was limited to our in-house IT team which was installing the Intune app in our mobile device. The installation was smooth and we haven't faced any difficulties with the app while using it. Provides a smooth and secure access to all Office 365 apps in mobile while separating the personal and professional data.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Work with a "test group" of users who you have a good relationship with so that when things don't work properly they understand! Work with your partner nicely without forcing things especially timelines as you are bound to make mistakes and create oversights in the project Management can also interfere with the implementation (which can cause delays) if you make too many mistakes which takes me back to having a "test group" where you have good relations
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Kaseya's system of handling patch management was not as intuitive as Endpoint Central, however in some respects it was easier to set up. Kaseya VSA and ConnectWise are also more geared towards managed service providers that handle multiple organizations versus a single company's IT department, which Endpoint Central seems more designed for. Intune, while helpful for machine management, does not have the level of overall endpoint management and inventory management and is better used alongside another endpoint management tool
Read full review
Microsoft Intune is more robust as far as fine-tuning security controls. It also allows for software installs, folder access controls, updating PCs, and other features simply not found in previous products we have used. Because it is rolled into MS 365 it's very cost effective. It's also a single pane of glass for managing user PCs and personal devices
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We have been able resolve and complete any requests which include things like software deployment or issues that include troubleshooting, much faster and more efficiently. This has had a sharp decrease in our response times and also time it takes to complete these requests or incidents.
  • The mobile device management features have allowed us to be able to have a much tighter grip on security. This means we have dramtically decreased our device vulnerabilities and risk of data breaches. This has saved us lots of time and money.
  • The remote features that are available have helped a lot with user's being able to work remotely and allow our organisation to sustain hybrid work. It means user's can still be as productive and IT support is as efficient no matter where the user is working.
Read full review
  • The positive impact it's had was it has been really beneficial in having an all-in-one Systems Management solution to be able to manage all endpoints across the organization. This has saved both time and costs from having to search/setup/manage other System Management applications and also have saved money from having to purchase a license for other commercial products.
  • Another positive impact it has had was in being able to easily remote into computers/endpoints, and also being able to provide remote assistance to end-users.
  • The negative impact has been it is not being fully utilized by most of the IT staff, as it is a more complicated platform to learn/master. This would require funding for IT staff to take training in learning the product, or require time to consult the documentation in the use of the product. As a result, this may hurt productivity in being able to have to work on other things.
Read full review
ScreenShots

ManageEngine Endpoint Central Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of